<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>INFOST640-Constructivism by Cat Kettler</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i</link>
      <description>Group 2- Constructivism</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-09-19 17:51:33 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-09-26 13:07:59 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>kettler3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2711358766</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This video is awesome and breaks the theory down to be more digestible. The takeaway quote from it is "Everyone's individual experiences make their learning unique to them." It means that everyone's experiences influence their learning. For example, it reminds me of our discussion boards, and if someone has a background with the topics in this class- like they have experience at a library instructing patrons, they will understand the topics differently than a student that has no experience. Learning about constructivism validated me because I realized that, most of the time, I can only really remember or understand something I've learned if I can relate it to something I already know. Otherwise, it seems like an intangible thing. -Cat</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Y2sU18vWb4&amp;ab_channel=PHILO-notes" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-19 18:20:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2711358766</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>kettler3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2711379744</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When students are learning about one subject, they are also building their knowledge on others as well. This was fascinating to me, and can see this applied in some areas. Like if an English class is reading&nbsp;The Great Gatsby, they are also learning vocabulary, critical thinking skills, and 1920's America.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.structural-learning.com/post/embracing-the-learning-theory-constructivism" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-19 18:34:36 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2711379744</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>kettler3</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2711415222</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>A negative to constructivism that I think instructors should look out for is the confirmation bias. Since constructivism is people building knowledge based off their experiences and prior understandings, there will be students that do not want to confront changes in their beliefs, so they will only accept information that aligns with what they already believe. This issue is something that instructors will need to confront students about that are struggling to keep an open mind. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ798521.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-19 19:00:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2711415222</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Critique of Constructivism </title>
         <author>keberle22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715016349</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Something I find really helpful when learning about something unfamiliar is to consult critiques of the new subject.&nbsp; For whatever reason, engaging with literature of doubt surrounding an idea helps solidify the new concept in my mind. Given that we're doing a deep dive into constructivism, I thought I'd explore the theory in this way. The article I found critiques constructivist epistemology in the context of science and science education.  A very simplified summary of the author's critique is that the constructivist notion that  "constructing belief is sufficient for knowledge" is incompatible with scientific conceptions of nature  and the process of teaching science. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2148999998/ee9fff5b86f12215c42388e55317b787/A_1008670030605.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-21 17:22:16 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715016349</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Beyond Constructivism</title>
         <author>keberle22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715060009</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Oddly enough, when researching critiques of constructivism, I found another originating from the sciences. While its only two articles, I'm starting to see a trend. It makes me curious as to what theory of teaching is popular in the sciences.  This article aims to identify weaknesses in constructivism, as well as its contributions to the field of education. Similar to the other article I posted, this one takes issue with constructivist epistemology as it relates to the sciences. This article also critiques constructivism's inability to recognize its own limits. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2148999998/3615baaa9d5f4a55081a3b7bd5d2948c/Science_Education___January_1996___Osborne.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-21 17:52:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715060009</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>keberle22</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715492905</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Another interesting critique of constructivism. This article acknowledges that constructivism successfully articulates a theory of learning. However, a theory of learning does not automatically imply a distinct pedagogical approach. While I don't know how much I agree with the authors argument, I do find it interesting to consider.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://neurosciencecommunity.nature.com/posts/41828-constructivism-is-a-theory-of-learning-not-a-theory-of-pedagogy-neuroscience-explains-why-this-is-important" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-22 01:24:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715492905</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Learning Theories: Constructivism</title>
         <author>aemuro</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715575244</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I found this to give a good breakdown of the theory. It emphasizes that constructivism is a discovery and collaborative type of learning.&nbsp; Learners are able to create meaning when learning instead of just acquiring information. Like cognitivism, constructivism focuses on connecting new information with existing information. However, it points out that different experiences or perceptions will shape the learning experience for each person.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2146050921/1f2a8c9f95a5eccc726ffc18c3c50ea0/Learning_Theories_Constructivism.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-22 02:18:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2715575244</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>On Beyond Constructivism</title>
         <author>aemuro</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2716942051</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It seems to me constructivism-based learning and instruction is heavily used in the science field. At the core of constructivism there is an assumption that if given the chance, children will naturally be able to act and think like scientists. Due to this theory, constructivism has been used frequently to teach K-12 science. This paper goes over evidence from the cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging communities that suggests that this core assumption about constructivism might be incorrect. Instead the author proposes an intersubjective approach to science education.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2146050921/40ee87471e26307c73cc283a08c97f4e/On_Beyond_Constructivism.pdf" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-22 23:49:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2716942051</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>rlferrel</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2718388153</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This page compares the three types of constructivism, the constructivist classroom and the traditional classroom, and constructivism and other learning theories. I enjoyed reading about the three different types, as they are all slightly different. Social constructivism is based on knowledge developing from one’s interactions and collaboration with others, cognitive constructivism states that knowledge is based on mental processes, and radical constructivism is that knowledge is created by subjective experiences and interactions with the world. I did not know there were multiple forms of constructivism and this page helped me understand constructivism more extensively.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.simplypsychology.org/constructivism.html" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-25 01:17:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2718388153</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>rlferrel</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2718425250</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This infographic gives background information on constructivism, the 5E model (engage, explore, explain, extend, and evaluate), methods of learning, positives and negatives of the theory, and what instructors need to use when implementing the theory. I like the use of the 5E model, it explains how to get students interested, learn about a topic, and decide if they have the desired level of understanding. The methods of learning show that students need to absorb that knowledge and then use it.  The suggestions for instructors would be useful when teaching according to constructivism, as they need to know what students presently know so students can construct knowledge.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2150816425/d8ba38a72c9c8d2810d45b69843b281d/1708C325_E571_45F1_9F02_C210D134D982.png" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-25 01:44:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2718425250</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>rlferrel</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2718427182</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This site instructs teachers on constructivism and how to use it in their classrooms. The page “What does constructivism have to do with my classroom?” provides examples of how it can be used, the “Demonstration” page shows it actually being used in schools, and the “Exploration” and “Implementation” pages provides instructions on how to start using it. I like how it shares the positives and the negatives of the theory and the challenges of implementing constructivism. There is a page that shows how to create a lesson plan with the theory which would be useful. I also like how it shows how constructivism is used in classrooms. It’s different seeing it used compared to just examples.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.thirteen.org/edonline/concept2class/constructivism/index.html" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-25 01:46:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2718427182</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kimberly Annette Hutchinson -Constructivism: </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2720371464</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I saw this and was captivated by how gaming has taken off and this article talks about how gaming education features constructivism:&nbsp;<br>https://www.filamentgames.com/blog/constructivism-constructionism-and-video-games/</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/2154613299/ba97121136410bef935de38cae9172c8/image.png" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-26 02:59:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2720371464</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kimberly Annette Hutchinson: Education Reimagined Through Constructivism | Michelle Thompson | TedX Bethany Global University.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2720403416</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Imagine if we could make learning fun! Actively engaging our "learners," as Thompson calls our students, in such a way that their brains ignite as their hands touch as they learn. Making each learner want to go to class like a kindergartener looks forward to school each day. If I could transform or reimage my lessons to look and sound like this each day I WOULD look forward to going to school each day like a kindergartener. And would that be fun to have a school staff full of folks like this! <br><br><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVMyHt5ULUA" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-26 03:21:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2720403416</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Kimberly Annette Hutchinson - What is Constructivism in Education: Piaget&#39;s Pros and Cons.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2720428518</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I really liked this article .. an easy read and simple to understand. "Students learn though thinking things, through trial and error." I found this to be very true. &nbsp;<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Just watch a three or four year old try to build a castle out of blocks, an adult laying dominos curving around, or a teen learning to yoyo. &nbsp;<br>     &nbsp;The child building with blocks puts one on top of - on in the case of the adult domino player - one in line after the other. While the teen spins the yoyo up... and down. All three work on this slowly and diligently until - OHHH NO! For the child and the adult  - they (dominos and blocks) fall. The teen... trying to catch the spinning yoyo. Then..&nbsp; they all begin again.&nbsp;Until... at some point in time after many trials and errors: the castle is built (and does not fall); the dominos are all lined up, then with one push... they ALL fall, and the teen begins to catch after each spin! </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://helpfulprofessor.com/constructivism/" />
         <pubDate>2023-09-26 03:43:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/kettler3/iras2o6hapofla0i/wish/2720428518</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
