https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9 Under each column, give a final score to each essay and a brief explanation as to how your group made your evaluation. Please write your group members' names in the subject line! en-us 2023-08-28 16:07:11 UTC 2023-08-28 17:47:35 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675467789 5/6- We thought that her paper was pretty thorough, and likely received the sophistication point. However, her commentary was weak at some points and seemed vague. ]]> 2023-08-28 17:43:15 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675467789 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469506 5. Strong evidence and commentary that connected back to the thesis. No sophistication - didn't connect back to a broader topic and wasn't vivid]]> 2023-08-28 17:44:36 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469506 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469508 We gave her a 6 because she established a defensible thesis, specific examples with in depth commentary/fully applying what she read to the theme, and explored complexities and tensions within the work. While we didn't like how she repeated "this connects" at the end of each paragraph, we felt like it didn't affect the essay enough to take off a point.]]> 2023-08-28 17:44:37 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469508 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469710 We gave 3B a 3/6 because of the lack of organization. They did not make clear claims. The thesis did not fully answer the question. The commentary wasn't connected to her thesis statement. Her analysis was not explained enough.]]> 2023-08-28 17:44:43 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469710 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469725 We would score 3A a 4/6. Based on the organization of where pieces of evidence were placed, the essay was hard to follow at times. We enjoyed their complex sentences, but it was hard to understand. The thesis wasn't clear until the end, and the claims were not clear.]]> 2023-08-28 17:44:44 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469725 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469764 3/4. Had a thesis, not really strong though. Didn't really connect back to thesis and the commentary wasn't very strong. No cited quotes or paraphrasing. No sophistication]]> 2023-08-28 17:44:45 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675469764 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675470387 3/6- We thought that this writer's commentary was VERY weak and nondescriptive. She also repeated the same points over and over to try to connect her evidence with the theme, which was not effective. ]]> 2023-08-28 17:45:22 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675470387 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675473015 We give Sample Essay 3A a 5.

This essay's glows are that the author provided strong evidence by paraphrasing quotes. Formal language was also used throughout the essay.

This essay's grows are that the analysis of her evidence is very repetitive and the person who wrote it continued to go over the same points over and over again. 

Overall, we believed this was a good essay therefore graded it a 5. ]]> 2023-08-28 17:47:10 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675473015 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675473046 4/6- We thought the thesis was strong and had good commentary, yet her evidence lacked complexity and didn't seem very specific.]]> 2023-08-28 17:47:11 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675473046 https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675473277 We gave her a 3, because while she did have a defensible thesis, her examples and commentary didn't fully connect with what she was trying to explain and her commentary didn't show a lot of application. Finally, she didn't receive the sophistication point, because she just stated examples and didn't explore different complexities, a broader context, or different interpretations.]]> 2023-08-28 17:47:24 UTC https://padlet.com/steph_faucette/ipb50i1x2psu4xn9/wish/2675473277