Mind Map by

Security Governance

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 04:49:26 UTC

Structures, institutions, and agents inside or outside of a state that define what counts as an insecurity or risk, make decisions, and manage threat through regulation, surveillance, and everyday practices

Semantics of Security

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 04:49:55 UTC

Security isn’t a fixed idea, it’s shaped by power, culture, and politics. What feels safe to one group may be seen as threatening to another. (Stampnitzky & Mattson, 2015)

Power and Language

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 06:05:09 UTC

Language shapes what is considered a threat. How we define “risk” or “insecurity” influences what gets governed and by whom.

Insecurity:

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 06:05:46 UTC

Talking about security often creates fear and suspicion. In some cases, “safety” measures may actually heighten people’s sense of vulnerability instead of reducing it.

History & Shifting Meaning of Security

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 18:34:59 UTC

Security wasn’t always central to criminology, but policy shifts, global events; such as 9/11, and new risks pushed it into the spotlight.

Governing through risk

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 18:41:34 UTC

Security decisions now rely on risk assessments, data, and predictive models. Authorities act in advance to prevent harm and manage uncertainty. (Ericson, 2007; Amoore 2011)

Extraordinary Measures

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 19:56:04 UTC

In the name of security, governments often expand powers after crises (e.g., 9/11). This creates dilemmas between public safety and protecting civil liberties. (Zedner, 2009)

Risk Networks

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 20:39:03 UTC

State, private companies, NGOs, and global actors all share responsibility.

Challenges

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 20:39:42 UTC

Risk-based governance can protect society but raises ethical and social questions.

Pluralization of Policing / Private Security

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 20:48:44 UTC

Security governance is no longer the state’s alone. Private companies, NGOs, and community groups all shape security practices and policies. (Zedner, 2007; Bowling et al. 2019)

Public-private partnerships

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 20:52:13 UTC

Surveillance and community policing

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 20:52:21 UTC

National Security

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 21:13:44 UTC

States protect themselves through defense, intelligence, and counter-terrorism, balancing sovereignty, safety, and international cooperation. (Zedner, 2009; Ericson 2007)

Military & Defense

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 21:14:30 UTC

Coordination of armed forces ensures protection against internal and external threats.

Counter Terrorism

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 21:14:48 UTC

Laws, surveillance, and intelligence programs anticipate and prevent attacks, showing proactive governance.

Critical Reflection

shirinr2005 — 2025-10-02 22:08:52 UTC

Expands capacity for security but creates unclear accountability and overlapping authority