20251504 김태린

20251520 임태훈

20251522 전지은

20251623 정진경

20251625 홍세영

20251712 김하민

20251706 김도훈

20251710 김지민

20251713 신단혜

20251511 양윤빈

20251517 이정민

20251622 정예송

20251901 김가인

20251905 김세연

김신영, 이예은, 한지윤

(*Among the team members, 20252020 정원준 was unable to attach the face video inevitably because he was not connected due to an error in the camera on the laptop. Please note that.)

20251620임승민

20252003김민서

20252013이나영

20252019 정보안

20252021 조예지

20251817 이소은

20251818 이수

20251821 이현우

20251804 김신영

20251825 한지윤

20251708 김보민

20251723 조서현

20251725 황지은

In conclusion, AI chatbots have the potential to improve both speaking skills and learner autonomy when used in the right way. They can become more than just tools—they can be partners in creating more engaging, personalized, and reflective English classes. With the right support system in place, we believe AI can genuinely raise the quality of English education in elementary schools.

실과교육과 정한준, 조규현

20251915 이상인

20251924 허지행

20251606 민서영

Our research compares ChatGPT and Gemini to determine which tool is more effective for enhancing student engagement and lesson design.

Why We Chose This Topic

As digital technology becomes essential in education, especially in science, where inquiry and visual materials are key, we explored how AI can improve teaching methods. We aimed to discover which AI tool could better support interactive, inquiry-based, and visually rich science lessons.

Driving Question

:Which AI tool, ChatGPT or Gemini, is more effective for enhancing learner engagement and lesson design in elementary science education?

Literature Review Summary

1. MERGE Framework emphasized the importance of human-centered values in AI education: meaningful learning, ethical awareness, responsive teaching, growth mindset, and equity.

2. A domestic study compared generative AI tools:
-ChatGPT excels in inquiry-based lesson design and formative assessment.
-Gemini is strong in visual content use and personalized learning.

Key Findings: Both tools enhance critical thinking and engagement, especially when used by skilled teachers.

Tool Comparison

-ChatGPT: Natural conversations, lesson planning support, critical thinking prompts, personalized responses.

-Gemini: Multimodal capabilities (images, videos), seamless Google Workspace integration, real-time collaboration.

Summary:
ChatGPT is better for student engagement via dialogue-based learning.
Gemini is superior for lesson design with its visual and collaborative features.

Lesson Example Comparison

-ChatGPT Lesson:
Concept explanation using analogies and images, followed by a summary. Clear and efficient but lacks hands-on activities.

-Gemini Lesson:
Begins with a question, includes experiments, visual aids, and collaborative activities. Highly engaging but time and resource-intensive.

Example Lesson Plans

-ChatGPT: Inquiry-based lesson on rock formation using a “cookie dough” analogy and a hands-on “create your own rock” activity.
-Gemini: Lesson using sand, water, and stones to create sedimentary layers, combined with visual analogies like “blanket stacking.”

Conclusion & Suggestions

There is no single “better” tool. The choice depends on lesson goals

Future Direction:
Teachers must develop AI integration skills and understand each tool's strengths and limitations for effective classroom use.

Team Name: Meal plan!

Your Name: 조서현

✅ Compliment:

The driving question was well thought-out and matched the purpose of the project clearly. I especially appreciated the comparison between traditional and AI-integrated classrooms in Main Sector 1—it was visually organized and easy to follow. The use of subtitles throughout the video also made it much easier to understand the content in detail.

✏️ Comment:

Overall, the presentation was clear and informative. However, some slides included a lot of text in English, which made it slightly difficult to focus on the main ideas. Summarizing key points with more visuals or bullet points could make the content easier to digest for viewers.

❓ Message/Question:

I agree that AI is a support tool for teachers, not a replacement. In your opinion, what mindset or habits should teachers develop in order to use AI more responsibly and effectively in real classroom settings?