https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp en-us 2016-09-08 05:36:54 UTC 2016-09-18 06:57:50 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Watchclock.png joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328592 2016-09-08 05:39:52 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328592 joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328645 2016-09-08 05:40:45 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328645 joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328688 2016-09-08 05:41:29 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328688 joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328757 2016-09-08 05:42:34 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328757 joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328771 2016-09-08 05:42:54 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122328771 joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122329156 2016-09-08 05:47:31 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122329156 joneill1 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122329286 2016-09-08 05:49:18 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/122329286 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546172 One similarity is that they are  both deterministic, however cognitive is soft deterministic. For example with cognitive, the internal metal processes define how we think, but we can choose what information we take in.
In addition, behaviourist is hard deterministic because, we are born into an environment which determines our behaviour and one of the main assumptions of the behaviourist approach is that our behaviour is also determined by past experiences.
This means that even though the cognitive approach is soft determinism, both approaches have an element of determinism when explaining human behaviour.  ]]> 2016-09-18 06:34:17 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546172 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546211 One similarity between the cognitive and behaviorist approach is they are both very scientific. For example they both use lab studies to study their theories empirically. The cognitive approach uses PET scans to measure internal mental processes through brain activity.  
Similarly the behaviorist approach uses animals studies to measure classical and operant conditioning which to distinguish whether they affect our behavior.   This therefore  means that both information from the approaches are highly replicable meaning that researchers will be able to repeat the results found making the results more trustworthy therefore strengthening both of the approaches theory.  ]]> 2016-09-18 06:36:25 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546211 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546213 One difference between the biological and behaviourist's approach is where they stand on the nature/nurture debate. For example: the biological stands on the nature side of the debate. This is concluded by the fact that the biological approach believes in the idea that genes that you inherit decide your behaviour and key personality traits such as IQ or intelligence,  whereas the behaviourist approach states that all behaviour is learnt through our environment, and only behaviour that can be observed can be measured. For instance,  through conditioning Pavlov's dog associated the sound of the bell with food, causing salivation . This means that both the approaches are limited as they don't take into account the other side of the debate and it's effect on behaviour. This shows that approaches that are in the middle of the continuum are the most ideal. ]]> 2016-09-18 06:36:26 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546213 https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546554 One similarity between the cognitive and behaviourist approach is how scientific they both are. For example: the cognitive stands in the scientific side of the debate. This is proved due to the cognitive approach using empirical methods such as: lab studies in order to measure and observe behaviour. The behaviourist approach also uses empirical methods as they only study observable behaviour. An example of a lab study conducted using the behaviourists approach is: Skinners box. To conclude, both approaches are limited as they don't take into account the other side of the debate and it's effect on behaviour. This shows that approaches that are in the middle of the continuum are the most ideal.]]> 2016-09-18 06:46:50 UTC https://padlet.com/joneill1/comapp/wish/124546554