To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Firstly, vocational universities remain the superior option to academic ones, because students can have jobs immediately after graduating. Vocational universities focus on skills and practicality that help them to be less unprepared for the outside working environment, which is harsh and intense with loads of overtime work. This will lead to students' ability to pull off consistent performance at work and may affect the chances of them getting a promotion, which ensures their, and maybe everyone’s final goal in work - a stable source of income. Taking the opposite, academic universities, for instance. This type of school mainly teaches students complex lessons of theories related to academic fields such as science and biology. However, not all students can guarantee their job as a scientist or biologist after graduation, which wastes their years of studying. All in all, it is crucial for universities to be vocational because it secures the job opportunities for undergraduates.

Certain people contend that the vocational school can be illogical due to the fact the majority of their curriculum are skills and practices. However, it would be gullible to hold such a belief because this thinking overlooks logic in every form of learning. It is evident that people can hardly think and work efficiently without logic, let alone learning. There are numerous fields that make up vocational universities, namely business and hospitality, which hold numerous utterly important positions such as CEOs and managers, and these jobs are demand-thinking, if not, require more logic than other academic jobs. In short, every job requires logic to function, thus it is narrow-minded to believe that vocational jobs are not logical.

In conclusion, I subscribe to a view that universities should be vocational due to more job opportunities it offers to students and guarantee them having jobs immediately after graduation.

On the one hand, academic training can give students a larger view about the area that they are studying about and provide undergraduate with bigger source of documents and information. However, this thinking is nonsensicial. As the population raised gradually lately, there are less job opportunities than it used to be. Students who lack of practical working skill can be surpassed by them who came from vocational universites as they have higher knowledge about what they should do. Moreover, academic schools train student to get to higher place in their job, for instance, professor and doctor. These position requires few years of studying, researching and lots of fee, which very unsuitable for students who are struggling with financial problems. 

On the other hand, vocational provide students with practical working abilities, which enable students to approach recruiters and get the job easier. Plus, vocational universities furnish students with practical knowledge not only about the career that they have chosen but also about relating area. For example, student after graduation can have the chance when they have to work in the field that different from what they have chosen. This is when the knowledge about relating area that they studied at school becomes useful. Moreover, learner can be provided with situation-solving skills which very conductive as sometimes they have to tackle with puzzling situations, which make student become more flexible with their future career and give them more chances to choose a work in the future.

In conclusion, despite academic school has its own advantages, vocational school is still a better choice due to it’s provision in practical knowledge and skills.

It is understandable why some people subscribe to the view that academic skills are a must if one wish to secure a high-paying job. Supporters of this thinking may argue that it promotes undergraduates to focus on theoretical skills and neglect practical skills, in order to have a degree or a P.H.D, stand a better chance of landing a high-paid job. However, this thinking is flawed,when it can leave them vulnerable and unprepared when they are in a professional work environment. For instance, an immature and inexperienced student who embarks on tertiary education, who keeps insist on the idea that having a bachelor degree is the shortest path of landing a job are those who are most likely to fail and fall under pressure. They are inexperience and lack the skills that are required irrespective of the massive amount of knowledge they have obtained during school training.

On the other hand, vocational provide students with practical working abilities, which enable students to approach recruiters and get the job easier. In addition, vocational universities furnish students with practical knowledge not only about the career that they have chosen but also about relating area. For example, student after graduation can have the chance when they have to work in the field that different from what they have chosen. This is when the knowledge about relating area that they studied at school becomes useful. Moreover, learner can be provided with situation-solving skills which very conductive as sometimes they have to tackle with puzzling situations, which make student become more flexible with their future career and give them more chances to choose a work in the future.

In conclusion, I hold a view that universities should be vocational due to more job opportunities as it offers and guarantee students having jobs immediately after graduation.

 

 

On the one hand, it is understandable why many people appreciate academic learning. It provides students with the basic knowledge that helps student understand more about the root of every problems. Moreover, it is believed that having academic degrees such as a bachelor’s degree is the key to success. However, this thinking is flawed due to the fact that the problem that every student has to face up with is how to apply the knowledge that they gained in practice. This leads to the lack of experiences gained after they graduate college and the struggle to deal with their future jobs, which results in inefficient works. 

 

On the other hand, in vocational universities, undergraduates are taught first-hand experience and has internship at companies in their field. This in fact enable them to adapt to the work environment faster as they have experienced the work before. In addition, they are more likely to come up with a better response to the task that they are given, compared to an academic learner. This can result in better chance to success as the superiors will will notice their achievements and promote them.

 

In conclusion, from my point of view, vocational university is still a better choice for student because it provides students with not only the knowledge that they need to know but also how to apply that knowledge to real life situations. 

 First and foremost, some people are of belief that the academic educational establishment is beneficial for learner because it enables student to engage in numerous well-paid jobs. However, this thought is immensely unreasonable and exerts an adverse bearing student since it prompts students to not only ignore the practical skills but also excessively focus on theoretical knowledge. Therefore, there is no denying that they become easily vulnerable with shortage of experience once they start working in the profession environment. In contrast, those participating in vocational universities have already had skills and methods after graduated. Hence, they immediately adapt with their working environment and their role in the company can even surpasses that of student from university relating academy. 

Secondly, another noticeable merit of engaging in vocational school is that student is able to have jobs immediately after they graduated. Since they have practiced and gained experiences from their study courses, it is unquestionable that they do not have to take part in the internship or an interview like those from academic universities. Moreover, companies in this day and age have a tendency to encourage learner from vocational schools. Because their productivities and effectiveness are far greater than those from ordinary university with academic teaching programs, it is justifiable that the recruiter from many businesses will search for them with a satisfactory wage to attract them apply for their companies.

For all above reasons, universities should give priority to create chances for students to improve more necessary skills for their careers in the future than focusing on only theoretical knowledge.

On the one hand, academic education provides a number of benefits, which mainly resolve around the comprehension of knowledge. This is proved by the intensive coverage of all disciplines, enabling student to become generally knowledgeable. Owing to this, they stand golden chances of mastering a wide variety of profession. Nevertheless, it is apparent that this extra amount of expertise will not exert a great bearing on their future career in that they should only focus on one particular job to ensure stability at work. This not only discredits the method of academic learning, but also further proves the superiority of the other pedagogy.

On the other hand, as mentioned, vocational teaching is of more advantage because of its concentration on only one field of work. Furthermore, learners are exposed to the working environment from an early stage, enabling their quick adaptation and flexibility to their first workspace as a school-leavers. They are also inclined to build interpersonal connections with others, thus are highly likely to get as much support from colleagues as possible. By dint of this, it is conducive that they can work in harmony with others. Eventually, their hard work shall be recognized, helping them get more chances of promotion.

In summary, practicality and experience are the main reasons that justify my preference of vocational tertiary education. To whom it may concerned, they should adapt my guideline on this problem to conduct a significant positive change on the process of teaching and studying.