My fancy stream by boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law Made with serendipity en-us 2018-08-28 06:24:05 UTC 2023-02-20 19:27:20 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/icons/Rafaelo.png app. boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275778946 download]]> 2018-08-28 06:24:35 UTC https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275778946 app2 boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275779190 labour law]]> 2018-08-28 06:26:18 UTC https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275779190 Transaction number boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275793997 2018-08-28 07:54:37 UTC https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275793997 ICICI PDF boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275794065 2018-08-28 07:55:06 UTC https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/275794065 Grievance boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/312116348 List of subjects/topics which can not be treated as grievance.

  •  RTI Matters
  •  Court related / Subjudice matters
  •  Religious matters
  •  Grievance against foreign Government
  •  Only grievance may be registered and not suggestions
  •  Grievances of Government employees concerning their service matters including disciplinary proceedings etc. unless the aggrieved employee has already exhausted the prescribed channels keeping in view the DoPT OM No. 11013/08/2013-Estt.(A-III) dated 31.08.2015

 I agree that my grievance does not fall in any of the above listed categories

https://pgportal.gov.in/NewGrievance/Lodge

]]> 2018-12-07 04:59:34 UTC https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/312116348 Supreme court on notice period boomshake https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/316345414 https://www.pressreader.com/india/the-hindu/20181126/281895889295698

Employee has right to resign, says SC

Can’t be compelled to serve, says court in case of Air India employee

  • The Hindu
  • 26 Nov 2018
  • Legal Correspondent

To resign is a right of an employee and he cannot be forced to continue, the Supreme Court has said in a recent order.
An employee cannot be compelled to serve in case he is not willing “until and unless there is some stipulation in the rules or in the terms of appointment or disciplinary proceedings is pending or contemplated which is sought to be avoided by resigning from the services.”
A Bench of Justices Arun Mishra and Vineet Saran made the observations while allowing the appeal of a former Air India engineer, who was refused his dues by the Central government carrier.
Past arrears
Sanjay Jain served in Air India for the stipulated minimum five-year period before he resigned and served his 30-day notice.
He joined a private airline and later approached his former employer to pay his dues, Provident Fund, gratuity and unpaid wages.
Air India said it had refused to accept his resignation and asked him to re-join duty.
The Bombay High Court dismissed his petition in September 2010. Subsequently, Mr. Jain moved the Supreme Court.
In support
Setting aside the High Court’s decision, the Supreme Court ruled that Mr. Jain had “rightly terminated the relationship by serving the requisite notice for his resignation.”

]]> 2018-12-21 06:25:39 UTC https://padlet.com/boomshake/law/wish/316345414