Sample 1 included contact information of both the writer and the recipient, while sample 2 did not.

Sample 1 expressed their goals more eagerly.

Sample 1 was more precise in including all necessary requirements

1. Both letters are written in a formal tone.

2. They both express the applicant's interest in a specific opportunity.

3. Each letter provides a brief overview of the applicant's qualifications and experiences.

4. Both letters express gratitude for the recipient's time and consideration.

5. They both end with a closing statement and the applicant's name.

How they differ:

1. Sample 1 is more detailed and provides specific examples of the applicant's achievements and experiences, whereas Sample 2 is more concise and straightforward.

2. Sample 1 is addressed to a specific individual, Dr. Simon Morgan, whereas Sample 2 is addressed more generically to "Philips," lacking a specific job title or company name.

3. Sample 1 includes a reference to the applicant's past experiences and achievements, such as awards and performances, while Sample 2 focuses more on the applicant's educational background and skills.

4. The structure of the letters differs slightly, with Sample 1 including a reference line ("REF: Application for Admission to the School of Oriental Music") and a list of enclosed documents, whereas Sample 2 does not include these elements.

5. Sample 1 uses more formal language and addresses the recipient with titles ("Dr. Morgan"), while Sample 2 uses a more informal greeting ("Dear Philips").

Tone:

Sample 1 comes across as more formal and detailed, whereas Sample 2 is more straightforward and to the point.

Language:

Sample 1 is slightly more elaborate, with the use of phrases like "take cognizance" and "granted the opportunity," while Sample 2 is more direct and uses simpler language.