Evolution of languages B1 by Maryse Peressin-Hay

Benjamin, SeRi, Avi, Ahobil

Benjabob317 — 2014-10-31 13:40:49 UTC

Yes, and no. The difficulty of learning a language is an opinion, so no language is better than another, but learning a language that is similar to many others might make it easier to learn many languages.

NICK TYLER MARY KAMRYN HI

2014-10-31 13:42:11 UTC

1. Latin is superior to others because it almost started all laungeges

2.There should be a universal language to make it easier to understand

3.A world without language would be nearly impossible to communicate with each other.We would maybe write or make a code for communication

Sedef, Yasmeen, Carson, and Cole

2014-10-31 13:43:21 UTC

a.) No, because all language should be equal and one language should not be superior.

b.) No, there is not a universal language. We should not because having your own language is a part of you.

c.) A world without a language would be harder to communicate. A way we could communicate could be with our actions instead of our words.

Benjamin, SeRi, Avi, Ahobil

Benjabob317 — 2014-10-31 13:43:28 UTC

There is no universal language, because there are many languages. We think that there should be universal language, so everyone could understand each other, It could be a combination of all of the languages today!

Benjamin, SeRi, Avi, Ahobil

Benjabob317 — 2014-10-31 13:46:10 UTC

If we had no spoken or written language, we could act out things and point at things. But we would be a lot dumber, and our population would shrink, because no one could warn anyone easily when danger approached.