<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>AGT Chapter 2 CClark pd8 by RICHARD CLARK</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h</link>
      <description>Evidence of what I learned during Chapter 2</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:50:47 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-06-11 23:42:51 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>LT 2: I understand the concept of perpendicularity </title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188534153</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The biggest concept of perpendicularity is the fact that two lines intersect at a right angle, which is essential when doing your proofs.  I sometimes forget this basic knowledge, but I will be sure not to forget this knowledge. This image gives me a base reminder that when two lines are perpendicular, they form 90 degrees. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/66a5e6b49f16d5dfd6b5bbfa7ec44a16/constructing_perpendicular_lines.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:53:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188534153</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 3: I can recognize complementary and supplementary angles</title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188534384</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel extremely confident in recognizing complementary and supplementary angles. If 2 angles sum to 90 degrees then they are complementary and if 2 angles sum to 180 degrees then they are supplementary. This artifact supports my statements above. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/4e5bb88681bb6d551b381cc47d27cb90/compandsupp.gif" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:54:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188534384</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 5: I can prove angle congruent by using complementary and supplementary angle theorems </title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188534666</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I am very confident in these theorems.  An individual must know the basics of comp and supp angles, which I explained in LT 3. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/b2471885814fc3c15823fb6ba623b03d/compandsupp.gif" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:54:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188534666</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> LT 6  I can apply the addition properties of segments and angles</title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188535241</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel confident in applying the addition properties of segments and angles.  You must add when you are trying to find the bigger segment or angle from 2 or more smaller segs or angles.  This artifact reminds me of the base knowledge of applying the addition properties of segments and angles. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/8dd69e1021c26accc57fade8d6337797/segment_addition_postulate__diagram_1.png" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:55:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188535241</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 7: I can apply the subtraction  properties of segments and angles</title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188535553</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel confident in applying the subtraction properties of segments and angles.  You must do this when you have the measurement of a larger and the measure of the adjacent smaller angle and you need to dins the smaller angle within the large angle.  This artifact reminds the of the fundamentals to applying the subtraction properties of segments and angles. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/6e5893b14c34e46fa3ed286a062987e0/maxresdefault__1_.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:56:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188535553</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 8: I can apply the multiplication and division properties of segments and angles. </title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188535753</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel confident in applying the multiplication and division properties of segments and  angles.  These properties usually relate to problems that include bisect, trisect, or midpoints.  If the angle is going from small to big, then you will use multiplication.  And vis-versa for division.  This problem reminds me the concepts of applying multiplication and division properties of segments and angles.   </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/ae1e0de23478cc43fc42207dd75e56e0/hqdefault__2_.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:56:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188535753</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 9: I can apply the transitive properties of angles and segments. </title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536028</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I am confident in applying transitive properties of angles and segments.&nbsp; One applies the transitive property when two angles/segments are congruent to one angle/segment.&nbsp; I often forget that&nbsp; two angles/segments can be congruent to congruent angles/segments.&nbsp; This artifact helps me demonstrate the basics of the transitive property. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_Intzv7xm4" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:57:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536028</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 10: I can apply the substitution property</title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536321</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I feel somewhat confident in applying the substitution property.&nbsp; One can apply this property when&nbsp;an angle is supplementary to another angle, but that angle is also congruent to a different angle.  Then you can plug the different angle in to be supplementary/comp to the first angle you started out with.  This artifact reminds me of the topics I explained above. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/ecfb00bb93dfba1c37b99dee6b5be0b8/Geometry_Vocabulary_2_7.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:58:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536321</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 11: I can recognize opposite rays</title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536596</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I am confident is recognizing opposite rays.  Opposite rays are rays that have common rays that extend in different directions.  Opposite rays must be on the same line and they must share a common end point.   This artifact reminds me of the concepts I demonstrated  in this paragraph. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/0c7234207bea0d3f9e84d17d2329d6ec/download.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:58:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536596</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>LT 12: I can recognize vertical angles</title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536894</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I can fairly confident is recognizing vertical angles.  I sometimes forget the fact that if 2 angles are vertical, then they are also congruent.  But I have studies this concept quite a bit and now I fell more confident in recognizing vertical angles. Vertical angles are non-adjacent angles formed when two lines intersect.  This artifact helps me remember that these angles are vertical, but also they are congruent. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/prod/216861515/726ff86cb3b3c7e12a153c144b36c6b7/pict01.gif" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-18 15:59:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188536894</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Self Reflection of Chapter 2 </title>
         <author>rclark210</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188724359</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I started off on the wrong foot with this chapter with a 72% on the quiz.  But I feel as though I made a lot of simple mistakes that are easy to fix.  I feel confident going into this test because I know how the test will be formatted and I've come up with a plan on how to budget my time correctly.  I struggle with learning targets 10 and 9, but I have spent a lot of time studying these targets so hopefully I will be ready when it comes time for the test.  I feel fairly confident on the rest of the learning targets. Overall, I think I am ready for the second test in AG. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-09-19 02:44:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/rclark210/i69p4qnsxg2h/wish/188724359</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
