GMO Debate by Kelly Kischak

TJ ( I most certainly disagree with Eamons(totally wrong) statements )

2024-04-26 16:53:50 UTC

I agree with group 2 with Antonio because a lot of people in my family have had cancer so if we could lessen the probability of getting cancer I'm for it. I also think we shouldn't be tampering with our health for a few bucks.

Jack (I disagree with Eamon)

2024-04-26 16:53:50 UTC

I think genetically modified foods should not be made what helped me some things that stuck out were saying that it unhealthy for the environment and the people and cancer was a big reason too.

Cami Donaghy

2024-04-26 16:55:39 UTC

I'm for team 2 because I think they should leave what we consume alone and Cait pointed out how it can mess with the regrowth processes.

Elizabeth

botchwaye0723 — 2024-04-26 16:56:13 UTC

I am for the group against gmo's but Aofie made a good point by saying farmers save money.

Gabriel made a good point by saying they arent effecting the environment in either way but Tynan made a good point by saying it can lead to cancer or other diseases and Antonio said there is always a risk of GMO's cuing trouble and now they are massed produced so now everyone has trouble and the produces have not made sure it is safe.

Andrew Rojas

rojasand0405 — 2024-04-26 16:59:59 UTC

I agree with group one because it is important to have a good economy and could help the public and eventually give more vitamins to individuals.

Sara DiNardi (anti-GMO group)

2024-04-26 17:03:12 UTC

I agree with group 2 because GMO causing cancer can be a risk, and can lead to genetic changes in humans. There can also be a loss of nutrients. Foods can become toxic and affect many systems in humans. People can also be allergic to certain types of GMOs. More greenhouse gas emissions are caused, and genetically modified food can be time consuming to make and expensive to buy. If you evolve the foods, then the weeds and insects can also evolve and adapt to these changes.

Sofia DiNardi

2024-04-26 17:03:31 UTC

I think it was very interesting when Talia and Andrew said GMO can be used to genetically modify foods to give them more nutrients and decrease chances of cancer and, malnutrition. I was really imprest when Antonio listed the cancers that can result from GMO, since Talia and Andrew said it can decrease chances of cancer.

eamon

2024-04-26 17:03:52 UTC

I think Aaron's point of the GMO be able to increase the nutrition was a good point

Brianna point of GMO con effects the relationship of the environment and the plant

I see it from both groups

Juliana

dichiaroj0716 — 2024-04-26 17:04:46 UTC

I liked the con group because of the point that Brianna made about the rats reacting negatively with GMOs because rats have been used as an accurate way to test things like medicine and see how they will react with humans.