Visual Arts Assessment (G11) by Vera HY https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c Internal & External en-us 2021-08-30 22:18:16 UTC 2021-09-02 05:37:31 UTC hello@padlet.com Group Task verahy https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1705442642 List down the components of the following for each assessment part

1. Assessment Tasks
2. Assessment Criteria

]]> 2021-08-30 22:23:24 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1705442642 Assessment Tasks maggielin14 https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706412131
  •   HL students submit 10–15 screens which examine and compare at least three artworks, at least two of which need to be by different artists. 
  •  The works selected for comparison and analysis should come from contrasting contexts (local, national, international and/or intercultural). 
  • HL students submit 3–5 screens which analyse the extent to which their work and practices have been influenced by the art and artists examined. 
  • HL students submit a list of sources used. 

    • ]]>     2021-08-31 06:02:31 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706412131     https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706414861 Group member: Ling, Emma, Armani, Trini]]> 2021-08-31 06:04:03 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706414861 important note maggielin14 https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706415260 Candidates who do not examine and compare at least 3 artworks by at least 2 different artists from at least two contrasting cultural contexts will not be awarded a mark higher than 2 in criteria B and C. Candidates who do not examine and compare at least 3 artworks by at least 2 different artists will not be awarded a mark higher than 3 in criterion D. ]]> 2021-08-31 06:04:17 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706415260 Requirements for SL https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706417782 - SL students submit 10–15 screens which compare at least three artworks, at least two of which should be by different artists. 
    -The work selected for comparison and analysis should come from contrasting contexts (local, national, international and/or intercultural). 
    -SL students submit a list of sources used. ]]>     2021-08-31 06:05:37 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706417782     Criteria maggielin14 https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706421235 A: Identification and analysis of formal qualities
    The work provides a consistent, insightful and informed identification and analysis of the formal qualities of the selected pieces.
    B: Analysis and understanding of function and purpose
    The work provides a consistent, insightful and informed analysis and demonstrates thorough understanding of the function and purpose of the selected pieces from at least two contrasting cultural contexts
    C: Analysis and evaluation of cultural significance
    The work provides a consistently insightful and informed analysis and thorough evaluation of the material, conceptual and cultural significance of the selected pieces from at least two contrasting cultural contexts.
    D: Making comparisons and connections
    The work critically analyses and discusses the connections, similarities and differences between the selected pieces. These connections are logical and coherent, showing a thorough understanding of how the pieces compare and contrast.
    E: Presentation and subject-specific language
    The work clearly and coherently conveys information which results in a visually creative and legible study that enhances the impact of the work and the reader’s understanding. Subject-specific language is used accurately and appropriately throughout.
    (HL only) F: Making connections to own art-making practice
    The work provides a consistent and insightful evaluation on the outcomes of the investigation. The student effectively analyses and evaluates the extent to which their own art-making and pieces have been influenced by artworks, objects and artifacts examined in the comparative study, making informed and meaningful connections throughout.]]>     2021-08-31 06:07:22 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706421235     Criterion C: Conceptual qualities chenlinghung https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706427364 - visually elaborates ideas, themes or concepts
    - effective communication of stated artistic intentions

    ]]>     2021-08-31 06:10:27 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706427364     PP (Sean Cathy Lillian Melosa https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706427793 Criteria A
    10-12
    Working across at least the minimum required number of media and forms, the portfolio demonstrates assured and sustained experimentation and manipulation of a range of skills, techniques and processes, and a highly appropriate selection of materials, consistent with intentions
    Criteria B
    5-6
    The portfolio shows in-depth critical investigation into other artist’s art- making practices, clearly communicating a secure and insightful awareness of how this investigation has impacted upon the student’s own developing practices and intentions.
    Criteria C
         5-6
    The portfolio clearly articulates how initial ideas and intentions have been formed and developed. The portfolio effectively communicates how technical skills, media and ideas have been assimilated to develop the portfolio further
    Criteria D
    5-6
    The portfolio demonstrates an effective and consistent process of reviewing and refining ideas, skills, processes and techniques. The portfolio presents a meaningful and assured reflection upon the acquisition of skills and analysis of the student’s development as an artist.
    Criteria E
    4
    The portfolio conveys evidence clearly, coherently and in an engaging, coherent manner.
    There is an excellent range of visual evidence and consistent use of appropriate subject-specific language used to document the art-making process.
    ]]>     2021-08-31 06:10:41 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706427793     Group: Restia, Maggie and Miriam maggielin14 https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706429186 2021-08-31 06:11:24 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706429186 SL HL Yaaa!!!!! https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706433714 Standard Level
    •   SL students submit 9–18 screens which evidence their sustained experimentation, exploration, manipulation and refinement of a variety of art-making activities.
    •   For SL students the submitted work must be in at least two art- making forms, each from separate columns of the art-making forms table.
    Higher Level
    •   HL students submit 13–25 screens which evidence their sustained experimentation, exploration, manipulation and refinement of a variety of art-making activities.
    •   For HL students the submitted work must have been created in at least three art-making forms, selected from a minimum of two columns of the art-making forms table.
    ]]>     2021-08-31 06:13:49 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706433714     https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706436832 One
    TWO
    THree]]>     2021-08-31 06:15:37 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706436832     Requirement chenlinghung https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706437042 SL:
    - a curatorial rationale that does not exceed 400 words.
    - 4–7 artworks
    - exhibition text (stating the title, medium, size and intention) for each selected artwork
    - two photographs of their overall exhibition
    HL:
    - curatorial rationale that does not exceed
    700 words.
    - 8–11 artworks
    - exhibition text (stating the title, medium,
    size and intention) for each selected artwork
    - two photographs of their overall exhibition]]>     2021-08-31 06:15:44 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706437042     Criteria B: technical competence https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706437812 - Demonstrates effective application and manipulation of media and materials.
    - Reach an assured level of technical competence in the chosen forms]]>     2021-08-31 06:16:09 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706437812     Criterion D: Curatorial practice chenlinghung https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706445488 SL:
    The curatorial rationale fully justifies the selection and
    arrangement of the exhibited works, which are presented and
    arranged clearly, as appropriate to the student’s stated intentions within the space made available to the student. 
    HL:
    The curatorial rationale fully justifies the selection and arrangement of the exhibited works as appropriate to the student’s stated intentions. The curatorial rationale effectively articulates the relationship between the artworks and the viewer within the space made available to the student.]]>     2021-08-31 06:20:15 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706445488     Criterion A: Coherent body of works chenlinghung https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706450881 -stylistic relationships across individual pieces 
    -effectively fulfilled through the selection and application of media 
    -use of imagery ]]>     2021-08-31 06:22:59 UTC https://padlet.com/verahy/i3a3ybu4sd8jn88c/wish/1706450881