This painting was made in 1914. The painting is about a futuristic building, and it looks more like a design or sketch. The painting is related to the WW1 because in that age people were futuristic because of the impacts of war. Every country tried to look into the future to have more technological advances. I chose it because I liked the relationship of that painting with the actual buildings.

This painting is trying to say that many people and especially women’s necessities were overlooked during WW1, while the government instead focused on the war. This art piece makes me feel reflective about the priorities in a war. I really like the name of the art, but I do not like that it's so simplistic.

This painting is trying to say about how the war was constant suffering for all parties involved and how the screams never seemed to end. The art piece makes me feel like war is nothing but suffering and that screams never end when it comes to war. I like the message behind the art and the name of it, but I do not like the art style that it takes on.

This painting is trying to say that people take art too seriously and that they should have more fun with it while expressing themselves instead of treating it as such a big deal. This probably is referring mostly to the early paintings that were coming during the war, and Marcel probably wanted to give the message that they should do their best to promote happiness.

In the artwork there are several elements painted in an abstract way. It presents Stanisław's perspective on how the world functioned through the war seeing as there is chaos and distress in the subjects drawn. I chose this artwork thanks to its variety of colors and shades as well as how even though the subjects are beautifully painted it conveys a horrific message of chaos.

1913
This is a painting classified cubism. 
We can see a lot of shapes that forms a drunk person. I choose this paint because of the colors.

In the painting a violent scene could be appreciated, Well at least I do. The art work is related to the World War One because of the title and the violence presented in the work. I feel annoyed by the force of the art work but I really liked it because it really caught mu attention when I first saw it.

Enter Liubov Popova — a classically trained painter, influenced by the Italian Renaissance and Russian icon painting. Liubov was 27 when she embedded herself in the radical avant guard that was developing in her home city of Moscow. She had broad a history of travel, and the intellectual clout to earn her an influential position in the new Supremus group. Together with it’s founder Kazimir Malevich, Liubov and a growing number of Supremacist artists worked to divorce art from figurative representation, and search for pure feeling.
This painting represented WW2 because you can see the chaos that was happing at that time.

You can see How it represents how people were running in chaos and not really knowing where to go.