-try encouraging the person to speak with a loved one

-thinking first, before making decisions 

-having time for yourself 

-don’t be overthink

-trust and don’t underestimate yourself 

-be open minded 

-act in new ways that make new habits that help you maintain

- your emotion balance and stay in control

-tell yourself that you accept what you’re feeling right now

-avoid mood altering drugs

19719017 Salma Maitsaa Anwar
19719152 Vinka Amalia Hasta Barata
19719165 Vrisly Putri 

Rahassanti recta / 19719019

Maria carla / 19719086

Gojek co-founder and former CEO Nadiem Makarim has been appointed minister of education and culture in Indonesian President Joko Widodo’s new cabinet. We personally agree with this decision because with all the knowledge that he has, he could make indonesia’s education system better by applying technology into the education for these several reasons. 

In my daily conversation, my friends and I often use the slang words more often than the formal one. Since the words are more common in our ear, we feel like it is little bit hard to describe the meaning of the word into "true word". We need to use more than one Indonesian formal word to get the same meaning with the slang word. So sometimes, it is not effective to use the conventional word to describe or talk about recently condition. 

https://today.line.me/ID/article/G6lZjY?utm_source=copyshare

Priskilla Buna Kristianto
19719045

Today, we are being bombarded with information coming from television, movies, radio, newspapers, magazine, and most of all, the internet. This means that we have problems for us to filter out what is right and truthful from what is wrong and untrue. We find that the youths are most affected by television and movies since they are visual media and almost everyone is exposed to the most because they are very easily available and provides the highest level of stimulation. Being so visually stimulating, it can also be derived that television and movies have a different kind of effect on the people. What the people watch on television would then work to shape determine the attitude that the public holds for or against various issues.

•Fhytho Benjiro Juando Franscies-19719035

A good and effective communication is highly needed in a long-distance relationship (LDR). Because of the distance, a word or event that is wrong and cannot be communicated can be a major disaster. A couple who is sensitive to fight becomes easier to stop communicating and sleep in a state of anger without a resolution reached. If this continues with the ego contest, then the relationship will fail. Sometimes even if one tries to apologise, the other won't care because they’re persistent in their emotional anger. Contrast to that, in a relationship where two stays close together, one of them will usually come (And of course the partner can’t refuse the arrival because it happens quickly, impulsively, and suddenly) and try to restore their relationship. This action will immediately make the hearts of their partners melt and thus, strengthen the relationship, unlike in a LDR.

Other important things are trust and commitment. Temptation to cheat may be too inviting to individuals who are not committed to the relationship. You might find a new person that might seem more interesting, smarter, and very explicitly real near you. Know and remember that new closer friends are always enticing at first, but the one that already knows and accept you - and vice versa - is your other half, miles away from you. Now after committing to one person in a long-distance relationship, it's especially important to trust them too. Often there is a fear that your partner will end up with another person, yet you’re already willing to give so much for them. This anxiety and lack of trust can lead to doubt, jealousy, suspicion, and paranoia, which attacks your mental health too. Don’t ever let one thing stays blurry in a LDR, ask and you shall receive an answer. 

Long distance relationships fail because couples fail to create and maintain a healthy, complete and fulfilling love life. Realise that what matters are communication, trust, and also commitment, just like any other normal relationships. It’s never the distance fault too! In fact, it’s truly up to you and your partner to bring intimacy, fun, communication, exciting and inspiring reunions, a bright future, and positive feelings on a daily basis. Fighting for your relationship is up to you. No matter what people and statistics say!

Firstly, vibrant colors, prints and fabric finishes are appealing features of fashion garments, but many of these are achieved with toxic chemicals. Textile dyeing is the second largest polluter of clean water globally, after agriculture. Greenpeace’s recent Detox campaign has tested a number of brands’ products and confirmed the presence of hazardous chemicals such as Azo dyes and NPEs. Many of these are banned or strictly regulated in various countries because they are toxic, bio-accumulative, and disruptive to hormones and carcinogenic.

Usually,floods in Jakarta are caused by the trash that piled up in Ciliwung river in Bogor city as the city administration recently activated the Ciliwung task force, a team designated to clean up the Ciliwung River in anticipation of possible floods. They clean up the river by picking up the trash to avoid clogging during the rainy season. I personally think this actions will prevent Jakarta from flooding and this is a great action,because not just Jakarta that getting the benefit but also Bogor can feel it too.

Many parents believe the Mozart Effect because they believe if they tell their children to listen to songs from Mozart, then their children will be smarter. This is supported by the many children who master classical music since childhood, who are very genius at school. Because of this, many parents believe in the Mozart Effect. So, if you have kids or you’re expecting to have them, how seriously should you take the Mozart effect? Are you a bad parent if your kids doesn’t know Eine kleine Nachtmusik from Die Entführung aus dem Serail?

There is no scientific evidence that listening to Mozart improves children’s cognitive abilities. The whole idea comes from a small study done in 1993, which found that college students who listened to Mozart’s Sonata for Two Pianos in D Major (K 448) showed modest improvement in a test of spatial reasoning. Since then, scientists have examined the claim that Mozart boosts intelligence and found no evidence for it.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20130107-can-mozart-boost-brainpower

The term fast food generally meaning that the foods are easy to consume. Many fast food contains a lot of calories. However, this is the consideration of whether it is healthful or not. Fast food is very poor nutrition. It is high in sugar and also contains preservatives. It makes me agree that junk food is bad for our body.

I agree with the statement that junk food is unhealthy to consume. There is plenty of well-researched evidences showing that regularly eating fast food can harm a person's health that exists short term effects. Eating foods with more sugar as the first meal of the day makes you feel hungrier at the next meal if you consume a low sugar. If you feel hungrier you are craving another food that contains high in sugar too and it increase your body weight. Obesity will come as long we still consume the junk food frequently. The calories of junk food is very high. There is a research from “Obesity Action Coalition” that explain if a person consumes the high calories then they didn’t burning each day it may lead they gets obesity.

Because of the facts, that nowadays professions are not compatible with educational background and of what Nadiem’s said, that the requirements for the future’s job vacancy will be very different.  Thus, to increase human resources, he will try to make it parallel between the educational institution with what is needed in the industry. He also will increase the lack productive teachers and its development, especially in accordance with their educational background is the main problem. His experience in building Gojek from scratch to its fruition might be the provision to those revolutionalize our education industry.

Making plastic shopping bags requires the burning of fossil fuels, the cutting down of trees and, in some cases, the use of unfair labor practices. By bring our own reusable shopping bag, we already do a favor by reducing waste and already have participate to save our planet. Some estimates suggest that purchasing a single set of reusable shopping bags and using them every time you go shopping could eliminate the disposal of as many as 20,000 disposable plastic bags. Rather than collecting an abundance of single use plastic bags that are not only inconvenient, but harmful to the environment, using a reusable shopping bag have more plenty of benefits.

Fadhilah Istiqomah
19719048

As we know, consuming too much junk food is harmful for our bodies. Beside that, the frequency of eating junk food matters when it comes to our health. Having fast food more than once a week was linked to a higher risk of obesity, heart disease, stroke and also early death. To prevent this kind of diseases, we must eat in a balanced way, like also consuming vegetables and fruit. 

Coordination Political, Legal and Securing Affairs Minister Wiranto said that certain aspects on social media like uploading pictures and videos are being limited during the emergency situations to avoid provocation and fake news from spreading to public. He thinks this action is necessary because fake news can trigered an emotional response. This emotional response can cause violent action in public. But i personally thinks citizens of indonesia are mostly smart enough to not be trigered by fake news, especially if it’s post by unrelevant source. The violent action are usually conducted by irresponsible party that the government should have been dealing with instead of shutting down the internet. 

The restriction also effects influencers that do most of their job on social media. Most of them feel like this social media shutdown disadvantages them since they have jobs to be done on social media. More over, as a result of this restriction, many people think the government limited their freedom of speech. This can bring more protests and riots.

issues is that plastic can be recycled. This could be too difficult to do or expensive. I strongly believe indonesia has important role to the worlds climate, but still have the plastic waste problem. 

Most indonesian people often use a single use plastics in the form of straws, bottles, plastic bags as a daily goods. This is probably the facts that plastic products are cheap to produce in this country. people’s awareness in Indonesia are still low, they’re littering everywhere. The effects are becoming more apparent as rivers and oceans become clogged up with plastic waste.

Indonesia has announced plans to move its capital from the climate-threatened megalopolis of Jakarta to the sparsely populated island of Borneo, which is home to some of the world’s greatest tropical rainforests.I think its an inappropriate decision for Indonesia's current condition. 

I think there are still many more important problems that must be solved first than moving the capital city. Moving the capital is not the solution to fix the situation in Jakarta which is getting more and more chaotic. In my opinion the improvement in the quality of human resources must be addressed first. Moving the capital city will be useless if the human resource quality is still the same. In the long time period the damage that occurred in Jakarta will occur again in Borneo. 

Based on Sarah Gibben's article in National Geographic entitled "A Brief History of How Plastic Straws Took Over the World" almost 8 thousand tons end up in the ocean. It is clearly give bad effect to the sea creature so, people start to make a champaign #NoStrawMovement. Several food shop already change plastic straw into paper straw or even not supplying plastic straw, beside that people could also buy stainless straw to make it easier. Stainless straw called easier because it is washable so people could bring and use it anytime. By doing that, we already participate reducing plastic waste and could save our earth. 

 The first step, mother can give food that can be handheld children, such as fruits. I agree that parents should model it first because children like to imitate so give them examples of how to eat right such as how to take food, put it in your mouth, and chew it. When children are getting older, Mother can teach them to use spoons and forks, then train them to cut their own food.  But, still accompany the child when eating. For another choice, mother can try to give their favorite foods.  In this way, children will be easier to eat alone.  Yes, because the food you serve is very interesting for your child. After that, Mother can invite him to eat together.  These moments can be a good moment for your child to learn to eat right. Praise he/she when he succeeded in doing something so that children become more motivated and confident.

The air in London is lethal because of polluting vehicles. The Mayor of London will do something. He will announce bold proposals which are critically needed to safeguard londoners from air quality heath crisis. Some of its proposals are, the most polluting vehicles will have to pay a daily charge to drive within central London, petrol vehicles that do not meet Euro 4 standars and diesel vehicles that do not meet Euro 6 standars will have to pay £12.50 for cars, vans and motorbikes, £100 for buses, coaches and HGVs to drive in the zone. It is estimated that introducing Uletra Low Emission Zone in central London will result in nearly a 50 per cent reduction in road transport emission in 2020.

The Indonesia new ministry cabinet has several interesting things in it, one of the things is the minister of education and culture, Nadiem Makarim. Nadiem the ex-CEO of a well-known startup called Gojek facing several contradictions. Several people do not agree with the decision to make him the minister of education and culture. 

The several people that do not agree with that decision, think that Nadiem had better being the Minister of Tourism and Creative Economy. People think that the ex-CEO of Gojek can make a better effect in that position because he has more experience in that aspect. People believe in him because he has successfully make Gojek estimated value is about US$10 billion.

It’s quite unique because the cause of schizophrenia is unknown until now. Researchers believe that a combination of genetics, brain chemistry and environment contributes to development of the disorder. Neuroimaging studies show differences in the brain structure and central nervous system of people with schizophrenia. It can be concluded that schizophrenia is a brain disease. Not only that, but there are also a few risk factors that can develop or trigger the disease such as having a family history with it, increased immune system activation, pregnancy and birth complications,etc.

The damage in the brain makes some several signs and symptoms. It may vary, but usually involve delusions, hallucinations or disorganized speech, and reflect an impaired ability to function. People with schizophrenia require lifelong treatment. Early treatment may help get symptoms under control before serious complications develop. Left untreated, schizophrenia can make someone try to injure themselves, have an OCD, depression, abuse of alcohol or drugs, and the worst case is suicide attempts. So, if you think you know someone that may have schizophrenia, talk to them about your concerns, offer encouragement also support and help your loved one find a qualified doctor or mental health professional.

     Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey recently announced that all political advertisement worldwide will be banned from their platform, believing that political message reach "should be earned, not bought". The details itself will be released by 15 November and will go live on 22 November. Dorsey also tweeted that while internet advertising is incredibly powerful and very effective for commercial advertisers, that power brings significant risks to politics as internet political ads presented entirely new challenges to civic discourse.

     Facebook, on the other hand, decided to rule out ban on political ads. In defense of this policy, company CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated that he had considered banning all political ads on his platforms, but also said that he believed the move would favor incumbent politicians and whoever the media chose to cover. The company should "err on the side of greater expression," he argued.

Not only can reach a huge number of people, but also can influence them. Social media give a lot of information about limitless issue such as politics, social, economics, environtment, etc. The amount of information has a positive effect, but also a negative effect. One of the major problem in this borderless era, is a misleading infomation or hoax. I believe, the emergence of this problem will not be continue and the social media platform will make a policy to solve this problem. 

One of the cause of misleading information is  simply because of the use of advertisements.

Social media advertiment is incredibly powerful and very effective for spreading information. I believe it is not only can be used to commercial advertisement, but also political advertisement. The advertisement of political interest can be used to influence votes to affect the lives of millions. To minimize the spread of misleading information through political advertisement, one of the popular social media platform, Twitter Inc., has announced to banned all the political advertisement on its platform. Twitter’s CEO, Jack Dorsey believes that political messages reach should be earned, not bought. I agree that Twitter’s decision has help the society to decrease the amount of misleading information and deep fakes. 

References :
https://www.wsj.com/articles/twitter-to-no-longer-accept-political-ads-11572466313
https://www.aljazeera.com/ajimpact/twitter-bans-political-advertisements-platform-191030202650906.html

Food is one of the most important things for human. We can't live our life without food. But, food waste is one of the classical problem that already being human problem. There are so many food that have been wasted just because human's greedy sense. According to FAO, estimated around 1.3 billion tones of food are wasted annually. It is about one-third of the food produced for human consumption, at a cost $990 billion per year. The thing that happened now is so frustating because of the starving level in the world is going to be severe. In 2018, approximately 820 million people were undernourished. When Americans can have a great food and left so many leftover food, many africans people can't have the leftover of the food. We can tell that every country have a different problem of food waste. Food wasting is a things that should be reduced. We can help our earth by doing such a simple things, not wasting our food. Food wasting may seems like a simple things that human have already done. But it actually have the so many side effect. 

One of the scariest things that is happening because of Food wasting is it can lead us to the ends up in landfills produces a large amount of methane – a more powerful greenhouse gas than even CO2. When you wasting such an amount of food, it is mean you are contributed to nightmare of our earth. It may seem to be a simple things that happened to our earth. But if this going to be a habit of human,  it can lead us to global warming that have been nightmare to our earth. Global warming have been haunted our earth since a long time ago.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2019/10/world-food-day-fight-food-waste-191016120808684.html

 People with low economic condition often legalize anything to survive. One of the great concern is the issue of under age labor. Even a 13 years old child can be employed by a company and supported by their parents due to their low economic condition. I don’t think it’s right because they haven’t been prepared mentally and physically.   Beside that, they need to focus on their education.

 The term “child labor” is often defined as work that deprives children of their childhood. It also can ruin heir potential and their dignity. That is harmful to physical-mental development. Children can be stressed over their work because they haven’t been prepared mentally. They have a big potential to do anything to relieve their stress such as committing suicide, self harming, and other unexpected things. Children are still growing up, they are the future of our nation. Employing children can interferes with their schooling by depriving them of the opportunity to attend school, obliging them to leave school prematurely or requiring them to attempt to combine school attendance with excessively long and heavy work. And ofcourse it will give negative impact for our nation’s future.

Because of many reporters getting paid by “famous” people then the news they report can be a right news or maybe a modificated news or even a wrong news about the problem,in case of getting tricked by the fake news we have to find the information about it not only from one source 

At last I think people nowadays have to filter about the information they got from media. Because media maybe will give them bad information or maybe a good information about news that goes viral. I think it is a good technology development that people can enjoy news not only from newspaper but now they can also enjoy the news from television or social media in our mobile phone. 

Fast fashion can be defined as cheap, trendy clothing, that samples ideas from the catwalk or celebrity culture and turns them into garments in high street stores at breakneck speed to allow the mainstream consumers to buy current clothing styles at a lower price. But it is particularly bad for the environment, as pressure to reduce cost and the time it takes to get a product from design to shop floor means that environmental corners are more likely to be cut. This philosophy of quick manufacturing at an affordable price is used in large retailers such as H&M, Zara, and Mango. Therefore, i personally think that we must stop buying from fast fashion retailers so we can reduce the the environmental cost of fast fashion.

Firstly, vibrant colors, prints and fabric finishes are appealing features of fashion garments, but many of these are achieved with toxic chemicals. Textile dyeing is the second largest polluter of clean water globally, after agriculture. Greenpeace’s recent Detox campaign has tested a number of brands’ products and confirmed the presence of hazardous chemicals such as Azo dyes and NPEs. Many of these are banned or strictly regulated in various countries because they are toxic, bio-accumulative, and disruptive to hormones and carcinogenic.

Secondly, cheap textiles also increase Fast Fashion’s impact. According to Patsy Perry from  independent.com, Polyester is the most popular fabric used for fashion but when polyester garments are washed in domestic washing machines, they shed microfibers that add to the increasing levels of plastic in our oceans. These microfibers can easily pass through sewage and wastewater treatment plants into our waterways, but because they do not biodegrade, they represent a serious threat to aquatic life. Small creatures such as plankton eat the microfibers, which then make their way up the food chain to fish and shellfish eaten by humans.

Thirdly, the rate at which we are consuming and discarding clothes is contributing to mass waste not only in developed countries but also in developing countries. 6 percent of textiles produced each year are floor waste and this ends in landfills in the developing countries where our clothes are made. While 80 percent of the clothes discarded by consumers in major cities could be reused, these typically end up in landfills too.

In conclusion, as consumers we must stop buying from fast fashion retailers so we can help reduce the environmental cost of fast fashion such as, water polluting, threatening aquatic life, and mass waste. 

Ebola virus is a very dangerous virus. It belongs to the Filoviridae family and is responsible for a severe disease characterized by the sudden onset of hemorrhagic fever accompanied by other nonspecific signs and symptoms.

Ebola spreads among humans through close contact with the blood, body fluids, secretions or organs of infected person. The deadly ebola epidemic in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) remains an urgent global health emergency. There is no specific treatment for the ebola virus disease that is currently approved for market.

The virus has killed more than 11.000 people in four years with latest outbreak hitting the Congo. Thousand of people have died from ebola since outbreak erupted in west Africa four years ago. I believe this is a big problem and need to be solve to each country, because it virus can infected person by many ways. New research find 80 percent of ebola survivors suffer disabilities one year after being discharged from hospital. Approximately 11,000 people died in the Ebola outbreak that hit West Africa from 2014 to 2016; tens of thousands more who were infected survived

This is serious problem of every country, Ebola still an urgent global emergency because of that. People should carefully with himself and each country which affected with this this virus should evacuate the area which infected of virus. So, you have to careful with everything you eat and touch, viruses and bacteria are everywhere  not every virus have cure or specific treatment.

.
 Indonesia is the country with the highest number of smokers in ASEAN. According to 2018 data, 33.8% of Indonesia's total population are smokers. Wherever we go we always meet people smoking. In fact, many of our friends are smokers. Why are cigarettes so attractive to Indonesians? There are several factors why many smokers in Indonesia. The first, the price of tobacco in Indonesia is very cheap compared to other countries. The second, cigarette has become a culture. There is respect when gathering with friends. When offered we are not comfortable to reject it. The last, lack of knowledge about the dangers and effects of smoking.
 .

Cigarettes have many bad effects on health. This is due to the content of cigarettes. Here are some of the content found in cigarettes . Tar, is a hydrocarbon that appears when a cigarette is burned. This substance is very dangerous because it will stick to the lungs of smokers. Nicotine, this substance is what causes addiction. Usually nicotine is used for controlled insecticides. Carbon Monoxide, this compound inhibits the ability of the blood to bind oxygen. These contents damage to body organs and cause various diseases.

Diseases that often attack smokers is cancer, diabetes, lung disease and heart attacks. Smoking also gives a bad influence on fertility and pregnancy. Other effects caused by smoking are self-aging and psychological disorders. Real evidence that smoking is very dangerous can be seen from WHO surveys that every minute there are 10 people die from smoking.
 .

A example of smoking can be found in the story of Robby Indra Wahyuda. This story happened in 2015 in Samarinda. At first Roby knew cigarettes since he was very young, around 6th grade. Smoking activities that make it affected by stage 4 laryngeal cancer. Roby wrote a lot of regret for smoking on his social media. Finally, at a young age, 26 years old, Robby died of cancer.
 .

Various efforts are needed to reduce cigarette users. Efforts to reduce smoking can be done by counseling about the knowledge of the effects of smoking on health at the elementary school level, there is a strict prohibition for underage smokers, penalties for smokers who smoke in public places (not in smoking areas), and restrictions on advertising promotion cigarettes. Actually the most important thing is self-awareness that smoking must be avoided because it has bad consequences. Get closer to God and busy yourself with positive activities.
 .

"Life is only brief, so we must be happy, and happiness can only be reach when we are healthy"

Usually,floods in Jakarta are caused by the trash that piled up in Ciliwung river in Bogor city as the city administration recently activated the Ciliwung task force, a team designated to clean up the Ciliwung River in anticipation of possible floods. They clean up the river by picking up the trash to avoid clogging during the rainy season. I personally think this actions will prevent Jakarta from flooding and this is a great action,because not just Jakarta that getting the benefit but also Bogor can feel it too.

Other than that,the Bogor administration would dumb the trash collected in the city at Galuga landfill more frequently. I agree with this action because can reduce the trash buildup,so the possibility of flooding will automatically reduce too. However not all trash is disposed there,some of the plastic trash is stored in waste banks around the city.

Meanwhile,in North Jakarta Water Resources Agency has made sure that all water pumps are in good condition and ready to absorb water. They also going to check the water pumps weekly to make sure there are no faulty machines. It is really important and i really agree with this action because we can prevent the flooding by checking the water pumps,although there are some water pumps that is broken,but it is still can be repaired.

As the conclusions, there are many actions that we can do to prevent flooding in Jakarta during the rainy season. Not just the government,but as the citizens we can help too, by no littering,always put the trash in a trash can,reduce the using of plastics and many more.

in April 2019,  London becomes a highly polluted. The Mayor of London introduce Ultra Low Emission Zone to protect londoners from the damaging health impacts of air pollution. Despite of the pros and cons, I support his ambitious action to help the city.

The air in London is lethal because of polluting vehicles. The Mayor of London will do something. He will announce bold proposals which are critically needed to safeguard londoners from air quality heath crisis. Some of its proposals are, the most polluting vehicles will have to pay a daily charge to drive within central London, petrol vehicles that do not meet Euro 4 standars and diesel vehicles that do not meet Euro 6 standars will have to pay £12.50 for cars, vans and motorbikes, £100 for buses, coaches and HGVs to drive in the zone.

Research by King’s College London suggests the lung capacity of youngsters living in the capital has been reduced by breathing in pollution.

They have an increased risk of diseases such as asthma and bronchitis and face the prospect of developing further health problems as adults from having smaller lung capacity.That is why the Mayor of London is absolutely right to introduce the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ).

The ULEZ will help reduce these emissions, to protect children from lung damage, reduce the risk of breathing illnesses and heart disease in adults, and improve the health of people exposed to the highest levels of pollution.

 So, it is estimated that introducing Uletra Low Emission Zone in central London will result in nearly a 50 per cent reduction in road transport emission and reduce the risk of breathing illnesses in 2020.

The term fast food generally meaning that the foods are easy to consume. Many fast food contains a lot of calories. However, this is the consideration of whether it is healthful or not. Fast food is very poor nutrition. It is high in sugar and also contains preservatives. It makes me agree that junk food is bad for our body.

I agree with the statement that fast food is unhealthy to consume. There is plenty of well-researched evidence showing that regularly eating fast food can harm a person's health that exists short term effects. Eating foods with more sugar as the first meal of the day makes you feel hungrier at the next meal if you consume a low sugar. If you feel hungrier you are craving another food that contains high in sugar too and it increase your body weight. 

Obesity will come as long we still consume the junk food frequently. The calories of junk food is very high. There is research from “Obesity Action Coalition” that explains if a person consumes the high calories then they didn’t burn each day it may lead they get obesity.

in conclusion, fast food contains a lot of calories and also very poor nutrition which can cause several diseases. Eating food that contains a lot of calories will increase your body weight and it's not good for our health. Obesity is the worst effect if consume fast food frequently. Therefore, we should keep our healthiness and avoid consuming fast food.

Firstly, our bodies need enough protein that contained in meat for fulfill our daily nutrition needs. However, a vegetarian diet excludes meat, fish, and poultry always. A vegetarian plan also doesn't allow dairy products such as milk, eggs, cheese, as well as animal-based products like gelatin. Even though vegetarians get protein and other nutrients from vegetables, it is so hard to fulfill their daily nutrition needs without animal-based products. 

Eating no animal-based products can lead into several nutrients deficiency. Severe lack of protein can lead to hair loss.  Iron deficiency can cause fatigue, dizziness, lightheadedness, a fast heart rate, or palpitations. Fatigue and loss of balance, for instance, could mean a B12 deficiency. Meanwhile, the typical zinc deficiency symptoms include loss of appetite, hair loss, diarrhea, eye and skin lesions, weight loss, delayed healing of wounds, and taste abnormalities.

Secondly, plant-based diets are typically rich in fruits, vegetables, wholegrains, nuts and legumes, but that’s not always the case. They could just as easily load their meat-free plate with creamy pastas or mountains of white bread. They called junk food vegetarians. They eat a lot of less healthy plant foods; for example, french fries, refined carbs, fruit juices, sweetened beverages, refined grains, pasta, sweets, and desserts.

According to medical professionals, eating an unhealthy vegetarian diet can put you at an even higher risk of illness than someone eating a well-balanced diet that includes meat and dairy. Several studies have found that diets with less healthy plant foods actually raised the risk of diabetes by 16%.

Thirdly, vegetarian diets are lower in choline. Choline is a nutrient that’s important for brain health and other functions. However, the amount produced by the liver is not enough to meet the requirements of the human body. The primary sources of dietary choline are found in beef, eggs, dairy products, fish, and chicken, which have been avoided by vegetarians. 

Eating plant-based diets can be bad for vegetarians' brain health, especially if they already have a low choline intake. A choline deficiency can result in poor concentration, poor memory, mood changes and other cognitive impairments, especially as someone ages.

In conclusion, vegetarianism is not automatically healthy. It can lead to several health risks that we have to take a look before having our a final decision to be a vegetarian. A good nutrition education is needed to avoid all the risks that related to this meatless lifestyle. 

   Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey recently announced that all political advertisement worldwide will be banned from their platform, believing that political message reach "should be earned, not bought". The details itself will be released by 15 November and will go live on 22 November. Dorsey also tweeted that while internet advertising is incredibly powerful and very effective for commercial advertisers, that power brings significant risks to politics as internet political ads presented entirely new challenges to civic discourse.

   Facebook, on the other hand, decided to rule out ban on political ads. In defense of this policy, company CEO Mark Zuckerberg stated that he had considered banning all political ads on his platforms, but also said that he believed the move would favor incumbent politicians and whoever the media chose to cover. The company should "err on the side of greater expression," he argued.

   America's political camps then once again divided in reaction to the news of the ban. The ban was yet another attempt by the left to silence Trump and conservatives, President Donald Trump's re-election campaign manager Brad Parscale stated. Meanwhile Bill Russo, spokesman for the campaign to elect Democratic front-runner Joe Biden, said that when faced with a choice between ad dollars and the integrity of our democracy, it is encouraging that, for once, revenue did not win out. 

   All in all, finding harmful ads on the internet is not a hard thing to do. However, to let Californian companies decide what should or shouldn't be in the public domainーit is the same as giving them massive authority that would be hard to undo. We already let them decide on things such as violence and/or hate-loaded content, thus asking them to go further than that would result in turning them into editorial arbitrators for public expression.

Because of the facts, that nowadays professions are not compatible with educational background and of what Nadiem’s said, that the requirements for the future’s job vacancy will be very different.  Thus, to increase human resources, he will try to make it parallel between the educational institution with what is needed in the industry. As well as his vision that by creating jobs, the ministry must establish an institution that not only creates employees but also employment and entrepreneurship. 

He also will increase the lack productive teachers and its development, especially in accordance with their educational background is the main problem. Also, he thinks that the root of the problem emerged in coincided with the great role of technology and information. Thus, technological empowerment is the key. Nadiem mentioned that many people had wrong perceptions regarding technology and education. Moreover, some people said he would replace all education systems with online applications that I think it is a good start.

In conclusion, as the newly elected minister, his experience in building Gojek from scratch to its fruition might be the provision to his program and revolutionalize our education industry by establishing employment and entrepreneurship, and also  developing online application for educational system.

Nowadays, Indonesia is the second country that dumping plastic waste into the world’s oceans after China. In this country, plastic is everywhere. it is a huge problem for our earth in the future. Plastic isn’t biodegradable, so it can hang in our environment for a hundred of years. Another

issues is that plastic can be recycled. This could be too difficult to do or expensive. I strongly believe indonesia has important role to the worlds climate, but still have the plastic waste problem. 

Most indonesian people are often use a single use plastics in the form of straws, bottles, plastic bags as a daily goods. This is probably the facts that plastic products are cheap to produce in this country. people’s awareness in Indonesia are still low, they’re littering everywhere. The effects are becoming more apparent as rivers and oceans become clogged up with plastic waste. Other than that, the plenty of plastic will cause the drain vaporization that can bother humans in daily activity. 

Furthermore, plastics kill marine animals. plastic is turning the ocean into a minefield. It is estimated that up to 13 million metric tons of plastic ends up in the ocean each year. They’re eating plastic because they’re thinking its food. Especially sea turtle, at most of the time jellyfish are their food. A lot of them are getting stuck and dying down there. It is the most painful effect marines life cause of human selfishness. 

In conclusion, plastic waste are very disrupt the environment. Especially for humans and animals. plastic have a big impact in our future life. If people awareness still low, is very possible the rivers and oceans become clogged up with plastic waste. Indeed, the marine life will extinct in short time. They’re dying because we’re ruining their habitat. So, please keep the environment safe for the better future of our earth. 

I think there are still many more important problems that must be solved first than moving the capital city. Moving the capital is not the solution to fix the situation in Jakarta which is getting more and more chaotic. In my opinion the improvement in the quality of human resources must be addressed first. Moving the capital city will be useless if the human resource quality is still the same. In the long time period the damage that occurred in Jakarta will occur again in Borneo. 

So,for current indonesia's situation moving the capital city is not a right decision, this decision will only cause more chaos.But one day the capital city of Indonesia must definitely be moved, when every core problem has been solved and when all the human resources ready.Government must be wise with this decision and also must involve more comunity voices. 

Schizophrenia is more common than you think. A disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly. It might affect you differently from someone else. The symptoms can come and go, too. They usually start between ages 16 and 30. Men often get them earlier than women. People with the condition usually aren't aware of it. If they do happen to notice the symptoms, they’ll think it’s just some usual things such as stress or being tired. I believe that we have to start to know and educate others about this serious mental health, or else something complex can happen.

It’s quite unique because the cause of schizophrenia is unknown until now. Researchers believe that a combination of genetics, brain chemistry and environment contributes to development of the disorder. Neuroimaging studies show differences in the brain structure and central nervous system of people with schizophrenia. It can be concluded that schizophrenia is a brain disease. Not only that, but there are also a few risk factors that can develop or trigger the disease such as having a family history with it, increased immune system activation, pregnancy and birth complications,etc.

The damage in the brain makes some several signs and symptoms. It may vary, but usually involve delusions, hallucinations or disorganized speech, and reflect an impaired ability to function. People with schizophrenia require lifelong treatment. Early treatment may help get symptoms under control before serious complications develop. Left untreated, schizophrenia can make someone try to injure themselves, have an OCD, depression, abuse of alcohol or drugs, and the worst case is suicide attempts. 

Schizophrenia is a serious illness. People in Indonesia may think that’s just someone who’s crazy and can’t be helped. Still, the assumption is wrong, schizophrenia can be treated before it gets worse. Therefore, if you think you know someone that may have schizophrenia, talk to them about your concerns, offer encouragement also support and help them to find a qualified doctor or mental health professional.

Based on Sarah Gibben's article in National Geographic entitled "A Brief History of How Plastic Straws Took Over the World" almost 8 thousand tons plastic ends up in the ocean. It is clearly give bad effect to the sea creature so, people start to make a champaign #NoStrawMovement. Several food shop already change plastic straw into paper straw or even not supplying plastic straw, beside that people could also buy stainless straw to make it easier. Stainless straw called easier because it is washable so people could bring and use it anytime. By doing that, we already participate reducing plastic waste and could save our earth.

People argued that the attention currently paid to plastic straws could serve as a “gateway plastic” that could prompt more serious and far-reaching discussions about the problematic economic reliance on fossil fuels and products made to be thrown away. There is another way to reduce plastic waste especially plastic straw by changing plastic cups into tumblr. By bringing our own tumblr, we automatically reduce the uses of plastic cups also plastic straw. 

In conclusion, i personally agree with the campaign #NoStrawMovement because it could help our earth clean from plastic waste slowly. We should save our earth to give a better future to the next generation to come. A lot of ways to reduce plastic are available but let's start from ourselves to bring a better life quality.

The zoning system is a system of regulating the process of admitting new students according to the area of residence. The system is regulated in Permendikbud No. 14 of 2018 and is intended so that no schools are considered to be favourite and non favourite schools. According to this issue, I agree about the zoning system because it diminishes the social gaps.

The zoning system is a Government policy that aims to realise the improved services and equalisation of the education quality in Indonesia. It aims to distribute education evenly so that a school with all smart students and unchallenged teachers no longer exists. The system principle is about not only competitions but also collaboration among students. Indeed, a great school is safe and accessible for people around it whatever their background is. 

For the students, qualified teachers will no longer be grouped in one school but in all schools. Various student conditions require teachers to be more creative in teaching and learning activities. Another benefit of the zoning system is to evaluate the needs and distribution of teachers. Teachers who have the potential can be transferred to regional schools thus the equalisation of education quality can be stimulated. 

In conclusion, the zoning system aims to revitalise the implementation of prospective student admissions to become more objective, accountable, transparent, non-discriminatory, and equitable manner thus it can improve the services and the quality of education. 

 The first step, mother can give food that can be handheld children, such as fruits. When children are getting older, Mother can teach them to use spoons and forks, then train them to cut their own food.  To help children learn to use a spoon, place your hand over theirs and draw the spoon up to their mouth. Their brain will register the "I am eating with a spoon" movement. For another choice, mother can try to give their favorite foods.  In this way, children will be easier to eat alone.  Yes, because the food you serve is very interesting for your child. After that, Mother can invite him to eat together.  These moments can be a good moment for your child to learn to eat right. Praise he/she when he succeeded in doing something so that children become more motivated and confident.

Now that you know what is "normal", it is important to mention that you may sometimes have to create situations to encourage children to feed themselves.  I agree that parents should model it first because children like to imitate so give them examples of how to eat right such as how to take food, put it in your mouth, and chew it. In the next time, letting them perform it on their own. Of course, you can use games and create a pleasant atmosphere during meals by playing soft or calm music to make he/she comfort and enjoy.

When children are learning to feed themselves, it’s an important stage for lots of reasons. 

First, children are learning to eat independently, which is a skill they need to develop for the later years of early childhood and for life.

Second, this stage involves lots of feeling, squeezing and dropping food. It might seem messy, but it’s one of the ways your child develops fine motor skills like learning to hold a spoon.

Third, this is a chance to help your child learn more about the taste, texture, smell and temperature of food. For example, she/he’ll learn that it’s easier to pick up a piece of banana or kiwi fruit than a handful of yoghurt or spaghetti bolognaise.

Coordination Political, Legal and Securing Affairs Minister Wiranto said that certain aspects on social media like uploading pictures and videos are being limited during the emergency situations to avoid provocation and fake news from spreading to public. He thinks this action is necessary because fake news can trigered an emotional response. This emotional response can cause violent action in public. But i personally thinks citizens of indonesia are mostly smart enough to not be trigered by fake news, especially if it’s post by unrelevant source. The violent action are usually conducted by irresponsible party that the government should have been dealing with instead of shutting down the internet. 

The restriction effects influencers that do most of their job on social media. Most of them feel like this social media shutdown disadvantages them since they have jobs to be done on social media. More over, as a result of this restriction, many people think the government limited their freedom of speech. This can bring more protests and riots.

According to the minister, taking down false news would be ineffective since there are tens of millions of social media and WhatsApp users in Indonesia. Limiting access altogether would be effective to stop the false news and violence-related content and hate speech via social media from spreading. Also the reason behind this restriction is prevent further damage in emergency situation.

Furthermore, this restriction can cause more protest and riots because it seems like the government limited the citizens right of speech. It is not fair to do the restriction to all citizens because of some irresponsible parties since they have the same rights to speak up and access for information. 

In conclusion, i don’t agree with the restriction of social media even during emergency situation because it is disadvantage the users from doing their job and access to whatever information they needed. I think taking down the source of the fake news would be more effective to stop the protest. 

 In my opinion, Indonesia has not fully implemented the points set by UNESCO, Education in Indonesia is also minus the word 'good'.  As education itself has the meaning as 'provision' to make everyone develop and become a better person.  Why do I have an opinion that education in Indonesia is minus the word 'good'?  If according to my own observations because not all schools meet the standards of adequate education.  I take the example of the UN problem.  I still like being confused about what national exams are held?  Evaluating student learning outcomes for years?  A determinant of a student's eligibility to graduate from an education that he has taken for many years with only 4 days?  Made 20 packages with the same weight as the international standard.  Then what is the fate of schools in areas or inland that still lack facilities if the weight of the problem is generalized?  So how can the UN be used as a graduation determination if it's not fair like this?  Existing UN is used as a field of money for unscrupulous individuals who are not responsible for persuading students to receive instant assistance and finally, fraud occurs.  So in my opinion education in Indonesia must be completely overhauled.

 Now, I will discuss 'Curriculum 2013' which is hot and hot among high school, middle school and elementary students.  In my opinion, this 2013 curriculum is good.  Why did I say that?  This curriculum makes students active and creative.  Besides that, with the addition of religious points in all fields can make students more moral.  In the past, many schools competed to implement 2 curricula at the same time which in the end made students confused, overloaded, and even lost their sense of nationalism.  Why does it have to be like that?  Because the curriculum in Indonesia is ineffective and makes schools eventually have to adopt a curriculum from abroad.  Our curriculum so far is only limited to knowledge without preparing life skills for students.  Students just continue to be fed with a variety of information, without knowing what it is for future lives.  Now with this new curriculum, I hope that 'students' are able to explore their thoughts and explore their creativity so that someday students become critical, creative people, able to think out of the box, and most importantly be useful and moral and obedient to religion.  But besides that, there are many complaints I hear from my friends that they might think are too sudden and too ‘terrorizing ’students, maybe.  But there is something I don't agree with the 2013 curriculum, about ICT lessons that will be integrated with all subjects.  Actually, ICT is not eliminated. They will only be united with other lessons.  In my opinion, the problem that 'can' arise here is a factor in the low ability of teachers to use IT and lack of IT facilities in schools.

As we know, consuming too much junk food is harmful for our bodies and our bodies system. Besides that, the frequency of eating junk food matters when it comes to our health. Having fast food more than once a week was linked to a higher risk of obesity, heart disease, stroke and also early death. To prevent this kind of diseases, we must eat in a balanced way, like also consuming vegetables and fruit. 

Consuming too much junk food is also harmful for our respiratory system. Excess calories from junk food meals can cause weight gain. This may lead toward obesity. Obesity increases your risk for respiratory problems, including asthma and shortness of breath. You will face a difficulty breathing while you’re climbing, walking, etc.

Concern about our health is matters when it comes to consuming junk food. Junk food may be tasty and flavorful, but consuming too much junk food is harmful for our bodies and the system inside our bodies. You will face some various diseases if you keep consuming this kind of food. To prevent this kind of diseases, eating in a balanced way is really important.

 

A few weeks ago, Indonesian president Joko Widodo had announced the formation of a working cabinet volume 2. Many interesting things from the formation of this cabinet. One of the highlights is the religious minister, Fachrul Razi, who has a military background. This indicates that the current government is focusing on countering radicalism. This can be seen in the fact that not long ago, Fachrul had raised an issue which caused a lot of polemic among experts. The reason is that Fachrul is designing and studying the prohibition on the use of face covering - in Arabic called niqab - and conical pants (above the ankles) in the state institutions. I think the move taken by the minister of religion is a fatal mistake.

 

This is a warning siren for the minister of religion, because if they are careless just one step, then what happens is not the goal achieved, but chaos happens. The reason is that this policy lacks strong and clear arguments. Fachrul said that the ban was aimed at security interests. In addition, he said that in Islam, there is no verse that explains the use of the niqab. According to him, the use of the niqab had nothing to do with the quality of one's faith, because it was only Arabic culture. The reason given by Fachrul seems too offensive and covertly states that the niqab and the cingkrang pants are symbols of radicalism. Though it is very clear in the development of knowledge in religion, the use of niqab and cingkrang pants has been very often studied by various major scholars, and this should not be a taboo subject in Islamic society. In addition, in the past few years Indonesia was hit by a wave of religion, especially Islam, from the mass movement, the emergence of many scientific studies of religion, to religion as identity politics.

 

The rise of religious issues that have arisen in Indonesia has caused many divisions that occur in the community, even though ordinary people. There have been many ordinary people who have been affected by these issues, even though they are not too familiar with religion. By bringing up an issue that elicits religious problems (especially in the private sphere) will cause not only religious leaders to be offended, so will ordinary people.

 

Religious symbolism as the root of radicalism is actually a mistake. Maybe someone who has a religious appearance resembles middle eastern culture such as wearing the niqab, using the robe, cingkrang pants, or maybe a heavy beard is actually not someone who has a radical understanding. They look like that only because they follow the scholars who they believe are right and differences of opinion among scholars regarding sharia have become commonplace. Maybe someone who does not display the figure of a religious person who has extreme thoughts. We cannot know that for certain. But the fact is, Salafy groups in Indonesia (group of people who look like Arabs and say they are followers the sunnah of the Prophet) are one of the least radical groups. They believe that overthrowing or even just blaspheming the government is a grave sin that should not be committed by a Muslim based on the Sunnah of the Prophet. It is precisely when the statement that the niqab and the trousers are forbidden is prohibited, it will make this group turn radical because their beliefs are attacked.

 

So, the government should be more careful in issuing a policy, even if only just issuing a discourse. The government should focus more on character education and the inculcation of state values to the community rather than bringing up issues that could be boomerang for this country. The government should even be closer to religious leaders from various groups. History has proven that diplomacy works better than using repressive methods.

 People with low economic condition often legalize anything to survive. One of the great concern is the issue of under age labor. Even a 13 years old child can be employed by a company and supported by their parents due to their low economic condition. AomeI don’t think it’s right because they haven’t been prepared mentally and physically.   Beside that, they need to focus on their education.

 The term “child labor” is often defined as work that deprives children of their childhood. It also can ruin heir potential and their dignity. That is harmful to physical-mental development. Children can be stressed over their work because they haven’t been prepared mentally. They have a big potential to do anything to relieve their stress such as committing suicide, self harming, and other unexpected things. Children are still growing up, they are the future of our nation. Employing children can interferes with their schooling by depriving them of the opportunity to attend school, obliging them to leave school prematurely or requiring them to attempt to combine school attendance with excessively long and heavy work. And ofcourse it will give negative impact for our nation’s future.

 

 Besides low economic condition, under age labor can be caused by some other factors such as child abuse. Some children trying to escape abusive home environments may subject themselves to any kind of work in order to survive. Child abuse may also express itself in adults forcing children to do the type of work that has a negative impact on their welfare and development. There are still some parents that may not be able to cope with the responsibilities of raising children while some may be ignorant of the risks to health and development.

 According to the impact mentioned before, under age labor must be handled seriously. Even we already have laws about under age labor, people still abandon that. One of the way is increasing our empathy. We have to think further. Because, children is our nation’s future.

My opinion about changing the law of gun usage in a country can make a big impact on the crime level. Now the crime U.S citizen made is only shooting people. For me,after you make the gun illegal  then the crime they make will not only about shooting but also in supplying gun illegally and rich and strong people is the only one who will make a legacy for themselves and poor people cannot defend themselves from threat they get. 

I do not agree, because it will cause a high crime rate because only rich people have high power to get a handgun, and there will be many mafias who are troubling American citizens and also certainly many people will smuggle handguns in illegal ways.There will definitely be a lot of opposition from Americans who oppose the government's policies and there will also be a lot of demonstrations.

An essay entitled "Saturday Night Specials" written by Harlan Mohr as vice-President, National Sportsman Association

Austin, Texas, indicates there are four reasons why U.S. Goverment must not outlaw handguns in U.S. I agree with the

author statement because, the U.S Constituation gives all Americans "the right to

bear arms" and also individuals would be protected to self defense.

 

Firstly, banning handguns is a violation of the right of fifty million honest, law-abiding citizens.

I agree with the author's statement. because, in accordance with The Second Amendment is

“the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed”. The purpose of

the amandement was to protect the states in their authority to maintain formal, organized militia units.

Secondly, the author indicates that an armed citizenry is the only defense against-crime and against a Communist takeover

of the U.S. I agree with this position. Guns took more than 36,000 U.S. lives in 2015, and this and other alarming statistics

have led many people to ask whether our nation would be better off with firearms in fewer hands. Yet gun advocates argue exactly

the opposite: that murders, crimes and mass shootings happen because there aren't enough guns in enough places.

protecting more people will make our country safer and more peaceful, they say, because criminals won't cause trouble

if they know they are surrounded by gun-toting good guys.

Thirdly, in the article,don't confuse the ownning of handguns with crime. Most of my law-abiding friends own handguns and

us them for hunting, target practice, and self defense. I couldn't agree more with the author's statement. Because, Protection

tops the list of reasons why gun owners have a gun, according to the same survey. Two-thirds of gun owners (67%) say

this is a major reason why they own a firearm. Considerably smaller shares say hunting (38%), sport shooting (30%),

gun collecting (13%) or their job (8%) are major reasons. While men and women are about equally likely to cite protection 

(65% and 71%, respectively) as a major reason they own a gun. And also criminals who use handguns in crimes are severaly 

punished.

Fourthly, there is the statement “if handguns were illegal, guns would stil be sold despite the law". I agree because, Guns are deeply ingrained in

U.S society. Guns are deeply ingrained in American society. Among Americans who own a gun, nearly two-thirds (66%) say 

they own more than one, including 29% who own five or more. A large majority of gun owners (72%) own a handgun or pistol,

while 62% own a rifle and 54% own a shotgun. About three-quarters of gun owners (73%) say they could never see themselves

not owning a gun.

So, U.S. Goverment must not outlaw handguns in the U.S. Because, the U.S Constituation gives all Americans "the right to

bear arms" to self defense and also handguns are an American culture symbol that cannot be eliminated.

I do believe that most gun owners are responsible for people. Don't abuse the liberty and put U.S. in jeopardy by outlawing handguns. 

In my opinion, banning handgun should be realized. As stated in Nelson T. Shield III, President of Handgun Control Inc's open letter, that there are 50 million handguns in US and for every 13 seconds there is a handgun sold. As him said in the letter, there will be 100 million handguns in the US. So it means, it is possible for every person has handgun and not be safe. 

Firstly, more Americans were murdered by handgun than were killed in Vietnam war. So despite of the statement that banning handgun is violation of the rights, the fact said it. If everyone has handgun in their hand, it will be more dangerous because of their heart is possible to change if they are in a difficult condition. 

Secondly, if handgun is banned, it will not affect hunting rifles and shotgun, but handgun simply promote and perpetuate violence in society. Athletes or any one who want to hunting, target practice, and self defense, will not disturbed by the rules because there are other guns they can use for each activity. 

Lastly, US has more homecides than anywhere else in the world. It proves that the cases number of homecides are similar with the people who has handgun in US. So, the uses for homecides is bigger than for against crime and communist. That is why, it will be better if handgun is banned. 

From the reasons above, I believe that if handgun is banned it will be better than not. By banning handgun for private uses, it will make the world safer. But everything is depends on our, as the people and social person. If we responsibly use our rights and also respect each other, there will be peace all around the world. 

The recent article of Nelson T Shield's concerns about using a handgun in the USA must be reduced. There are many problems because misuse of handgun resulting in many victims. From the statistics data, there are 32 murders by using a handgun in a single week. Making regulations will reduce slowly. Because of this, the US government should ban the sale, manufacture, import of handguns.

USA should make the handgun being illegal because there are too many murders we're killed by handgun. Handgun are responsible for half the nation murder. The murder will likely to use a handgun than other weapons. Banned a handgun in the USA it sounds impossible because the USA is the ”gun culture”, based on historical story. Circulation of handgun in the USA will continue along with the weapons industry still run. 

in conclution, government should be strictly to reduce the circulation of handguns. Besides that, government should be banning import, manufacture, and sales of weapons.

My opinion about changing the law of gun usage in a country can make a big impact on the crime level. Now the crime U.S citizen made is only shooting people. For me,after you make the gun illegal  then the crime they make will not only about shooting but also in supplying gun illegally and rich and strong people is the only one who will make a legacy for themselves and poor people cannot defend themselves from threat they get. 

If handgun banned by the goverment of U.S maybe they should consider about it again because having a gandgun is not only for attacking people but also for protecting theirselves from criminals with guns and also banning it will make many people desperate to illegally importing handgun to america and after all banning handgun is expanding the crime levels not reducing crime and saving lifes. 

So my last opinion and my conclusion about banning handgun in U.S is not a good idea. Goverment should make a deep consideration about banning handgun because handgun make people feel safe and banning it will make  things worst in U.S 

Basically possession of weapons in the US is the right of every citizen protected by the Second Amendment to the Constitution of 1791 begins.  The amendment was adopted from the Bill of Right.

The second amendment states, "Well-organized militias that are needed for the security of an independent state, the rights of the people to store and carry weapons must not be permitted."

In the Second Amendment, it is not specifically regulated that US citizens may own and use weapons.  US Federal Law through The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act (1994) only prohibits those under the age of 18 from having a gun and ammunition.

I do not agree, because it will cause a high crime rate because only rich people have high power to get a handgun, and there will be many mafias who are troubling American citizens and also certainly many people will smuggle handguns in illegal ways.There will definitely be a lot of opposition from Americans who oppose the government's policies and there will also be a lot of demonstrations.

Discuss about illegal handgun use in United States, it has big impact for the citizens safety. The facts is that hundreds million handguns is sold  each year. People with handgun are more likely to kill people than those arm with other weapons. For getting more safer, government should be in-charge in this serious issue. If the amount of handgun keep rising, so do the crime rate in us. Most of the people in the nation will not feeling safe if this issues still going on. 

To summarize, for the safer life in united states government need to be more strict about the regulations. Moreover, to reduce the rising crime rate, government should have to understand about the “gun culture” and divert to takeover the handgun by import and manufactures. 

Additionally,he said that making handguns illegal will not affect hunting rifles and shotguns. 

In the USA there was a high record of murdering and violence that used handguns. Many people said that handguns should be banned,and i agree with this statement because we can reduce violence by handguns control. America would simply be safer if they constructed their gun laws. 

Not all of the USA citizens agree with this argument,especially for those who need guns for hunting. In line with this,rifle and shotguns will not be affected. There are arguments about people who use them just for fun,but no matter trustworthy they might be they have to reckon with the price. There are thousand of people maimed and paralyzed,so still it is better to ban guns to protect our society.

Yet many on the political right continue to make an argument that even taken away everyone's guns, they would still have evil in their hearts, and if they really wanted to kill they would find a way. However,in my opinion,guns are kind of weapon with the highest risk. Therefore,guns still hold that murdering record.

Based on argument above,it can be conclude that guns are bad and bringing many negativity to the society. Banning guns is a must to reduce negativity and makes a better world.

Two letters by Harlan Mohr and Nesson T. Shield 3 concerns in the handguns banning but they both have opposite viewpoints. Author, Harlan Mohr, discuss his disagreement regarding to outlawing handguns in The United States. He stated four reasons, banning handguns is a violation of right and self-defense, and the owning handguns is not a criminal and illegal. The other author, Nesson T, stated that handguns must be banned on a national level in order to reduce tge rate of criminalism in The United States. Seeing this kind of issues, I personally agree with Nesson T. statement.

Based on his disagreement, the fact is that people with handguns are more likely to kill people rather than any other weapon. Thus, it must be banned with help from the government’s capability. Several ways that can be implemented by government are by banning the sale, import, and manufacture of handguns, and by passing tough restrictions to keep handguns out of The United States circulation.

In conclusion, regarding to this issues, if the number of handguns keep increasing day by day and considering civilians’s safety and their right of life, it is government’s responsibility to establish new regulation. 

In this letter, Mr. Shield said that Americans live in a “gun culture”. I argue that a culture is a way of life that happened a long time ago and still remain until now. A culture is something that’s not easy to be left. When a culture is removed from the society, perhaps the society will chaos. If handguns will be illegal, there will be a lot of people find, buy, then sell it again. It can be an organized crime by the real criminals. 

In summary, Mr. Shield’s perspective and my perspective about banning a handgun in the U.S are different. If handgun is going to be an illegal thing, then there will be more organized crime that use their innovation to make handgun keep exist.