who is to blame? by

primary suspect

779472_1 — 2024-04-17 21:15:23 UTC

Secondary suspect

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 00:47:56 UTC

Reasoning #1

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 20:57:36 UTC

King Leopold II would Make the people from Congo work really fast and hard. To make sure the men would work in the risky rubber fields,he would take all the women from a village. If the men wanted their wives and daughters back, they would have to go through dangerous situations to collect rubber for him to sell. If anyone didn't want to work, they would face being killed, or even worse.

Reasoning #2

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 20:58:58 UTC

King Leopold II said he was taking the land of the Congo to assist the Congolese people. He said his International African Association was meant to help the people of the Congo. But instead, he cruelly killed the Congolese people.

Reasoning#3

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:01:27 UTC

This would make the supply curve move to the right, which would lower the price of rubber and reduce your profits. So, King Leopold II needed to take quick action. And that's when he he fourest the congolese people to retrieve rudder for him or he would have people kill them or worse

murder weapon

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:04:00 UTC

Having power

victims

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:07:08 UTC

the Congolese people

Reasoning #1

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:07:57 UTC

He was responsible for the terrible attacks, kidnappings, making people work against their will, and killing 10,000,000 congolese people

Reasoning #2

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:10:02 UTC

Leon Rom could do whatever he pleased. That included hurting and killing the innocent people of Congo. Because he asked to go to the Congo because he knew there would be no one to look over he could do anything you wanted

Reasoning #3

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:10:42 UTC

He is the reason the Congolese people were whipped, killed, had their arms chopped off, and women and children kidnapped just for some rubber.

Murder weapon

779472_1 — 2024-04-18 21:15:04 UTC

guns