"In the production of knowledge, if observation is an essential and flawed tool, there will be big problems."

• State the area of knowledge.

• Describe the scenario or link to a website/image.

• What knowledge is produced in this scenario?

• Why is observation essential?

• How is observation flawed?

• Why does the flawed observation pose a major problem?

To what extent or under what circumstances will you say that essential but flawed observation matters in the production of knowledge?

"In the production of knowledge, if observation is an essential and flawed tool, it does not necessarily cause any problems."

• State the area of knowledge.

• Describe the scenario or link to a website/image.

• What knowledge is produced in this scenario?

• Why is observation essential?

• How is observation flawed?

• Why does the flawed observation NOT pose a major problem?

To what extent or under what circumstances will you say that essential but flawed observation does not matters in the production of knowledge?

"Doubt is central to the pursuit of knowledge."

• State the area of knowledge.

• Describe the scenario or link to a website/image.

• What knowledge is being pursued here?

• What role does doubt play in the pursuit of knowledge?

• Why does doubt play a central role?

To what extent or under what circumstances will doubt be central to the pursuit of knowledge?

"Doubt is not always central to the pursuit of knowledge."

• State the area of knowledge.

• Describe the scenario or link to a website/image.

• What knowledge is being pursued here?

• What role does doubt play, and why is it not essential?

• OR, what thing other than doubt plays the central role here?

To what extent or under what circumstances is doubt not central to the pursuit of knowledge?

“The power of knowledge is determined by the way in which the knowledge is conveyed."

“The power of knowledge is NOT determined by the way in which the knowledge is conveyed."

• What is the knowledge?

• How is it conveyed?

• Is it powerful?

• Why does the way of conveying determine how powerful the knowledge becomes?

• What is the knowledge?

• How is it conveyed?

• Is it powerful?

• Why does the way of conveying not affect how powerful the knowledge becomes?

"We can only understand knowledge when we understand its context."

"We can understand knowledge even without understanding its context."

• What is the knowledge?

• What is the context?

• Why does the context matter for understanding the knowledge? / Without the context, how is the knowledge misunderstood?

• What is the knowledge?

• What is the context?

• Why does the context NOT matter when we try to understand the knowledge?

"All things are number."

• Choose an art or human science example.

• What is the role of numbers in your scenario?

• Why are numbers essential / fundamental / core to the scenario?

"NOT all things are numbers."

• Choose an art or human science example.

• Why are numbers not involved / not essential / not useful in your scenario?

"Interpretation is a reliable tool in the production of knowledge."

• What knowledge is produced?

• How is interpretation used in the production of this knowledge?

• Why is interpretation reliable in the process? How do you know it is reliable?

"Interpretation is NOT a reliable tool in the production of knowledge."

• What knowledge is produced?

• How is interpretation used in the production of this knowledge?

• Why is interpretation not reliable in the process? How do you know?