The last animal out of our zoo was the cheetah. We decided to take it out in order to have more space for people to walk around rather than adding another animal.

2. We did not have extra animals that were not in the slideshow

3. The last animal we had in our zoo was the Hippo, it is a popular attraction and w2e figured many people would love to see it.

We included animals that we knew were popular in zoos because we wanted to encourage the most amount of people to come. We included animals like giraffes that guests could interact with by feeding them.

We included a cheetah first because it is a very popular animal in many zoos, and we included a kangaroo last because it is unique and less common in zoos. Both animals do not take up much acreage.

A zoo with just one animal would only appeal to a small group of people, therefore not generating much profit. People likely want to go to a zoo to see multiple animals that they can't see in the wild, and one singular animal would give the guests less to do.

Due to the situation demonstrating scarcity of resources every animal could not make it.

A zoo with one animal would not be as profitable due to less diversity in audiences that would go to the zoo.

Due to this factors such as diversity, long-term costs, and space requirements were used to determine inclusion and exclusion.

The point of this activity was to see what factors affected the choices we made due to scarcity.

The last in was the kangaroo and the last out was the lion

We did not add all of the animals to the zoo because we thought the ones we added were efficient uses of space and it fit in the zoo.

The last animal in the zoo was the hippo because we only had 2 acres left and it made sense to put it in.

I think the point of this activity is to find animals that made sense in the zoo and the trade off of space and resources required to take care of it versus how much people enjoyed it should be worth it.

Not every animal made it into our zoo. Not every animal fits into our zoo because when we decided on some food options such as the food trucks and attraction which was the roller coaster. We also valued certain animals a lot more than others.

No, we felt that certain ones were better for their acreage than others. For example, the monkeys for half an acre is better than bringing the rhinos since they take up less space and would require less money to manage.

Our group decided to add an aqua theatre that includes dolphins. As well as zebras and a petting zoo.

The last animal in our zoo was the giraffes since we felt they would cost more than other animals per acre.

Not every animal made it into our zoo because we saw some animals more interesting and attractive than others. We also had to take into account space that we had to leave for other things like restaurants, gift shops, etc.

You would likely not want a zoo with just one animal since it would limit the amount of patrons that would visit.

Our last animal in and out of our zoo was the Hippopotamus since it requires a very large plot of land and is a fascinating animal.

The point of this activity is not to dream about owning a zoo but more about understanding what it would be like to plan one and see the decisions that would need to be made in order to have a successful business.

No, not every animal made it to our zoo. That is because there is a limited amount of acres, and therefore some animals needed to be sacrificed for things like restaurants and gift shops. Having every animal would require a lot of space and be too expensive.

We would not want just one animal in the zoo because for a zoo to be successful, you can not show people just one animal. A zoo has to be a fun experience where you can learn about and see many different types of animals.

The last animal we added was the giraffe because it was the biggest, heaviest, and required the most caring/food. The determining factor, I would say, is size and the amount of space they occupy.

Not every animal made it into our zoo. We didn't include some of them because of space and theme.

I wouldn't want a zoo with only one animal because it wouldn't get enough revenue. The zoo would lack variety and less people would come in to see just one animal.

The last animal in was the hippo and the last animal out was the cheetah. We decided to keep the hippo because we had 2 acres left, and didn't want more than one more exhibit, but we had to get rid of the cheetahs to make space for walking.

Due to acreage constraints, not all animals were able to be included in the zoo. We selected the uncut animals based on how many visitors they would attract and cost efficiency. (ex: we picked monkeys because they have a small acreage and everyone loves monkeys, but we got rid of elephants because they're too huge)

We didn't add another animal other than the existing choices.

The last animal that made the cut was the kangaroo was because it was more of an afterthought that is the most resource efficient. The last animal cut was the Tiger. It was too similar to the cheetah so we felt that not much would be lost if it was cut.

Primary factors of inclusion include the appeal to customers, the cost of management, and other minor factors like variety, bias, and possible business ventures involving the animal.

No, you would not want to have a zoo with only one animal because that would only attract a certain group of people that really liked that particular animal. It is more beneficial, financially, to have a variety of animals so that more people with come.

The last animal in was the hippo and the last one out was the cheetah. We kept the hipp because we had 2 acres left and didn't want two more animals. We got rid of the cheetah because we needed room for the people to walk around and view the animals.