Enmiendas / casos by Pablo https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas Casos que ejemplifican las violaciones a ciertas enmiendas pertenecientes a The Bill of Rights en-us 2018-08-29 19:57:19 UTC 2025-09-28 12:41:23 UTC hello@padlet.com Enmiendas detalladas pablooldaq1 https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276395711 2018-08-29 19:59:57 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276395711 Chaos in the streets pablooldaq1 https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276397137

]]> 2018-08-29 20:05:34 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276397137 News pablooldaq1 https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276397818 2018-08-29 20:07:37 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276397818 Bail pablooldaq1 https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276398306 2018-08-29 20:09:54 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276398306 Caso pablooldaq1 https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276400843 Idaho
State v. Stewart, 234 P.3d 707 (2010)
The defendant filed a motion to dismiss based on double jeopardy arguing that he could not be charged for the crime of stalking as a misdemeanor and stalking as a felony as the elements of both crimes were the same. The Idaho Supreme Court examined the double jeopardy issue and determined that the lower court had not examined it properly. The Court determined that misdemeanor stalking was not a separate offense from felony stalking, rather it was a lesser included offense of felony stalking—the felony stalking statute incorporates the misdemeanor stalking statute by reference.
]]> 2018-08-29 20:21:42 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/276400843 Curtis Flowers faces 6th trial for the same crime https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/389534617 2019-09-25 15:31:25 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/389534617 Michigan Supreme Court: Police Trespassed https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/389542296 ... The decision centered on a controversial tactic known as a “knock and talk,” which involves law enforcement approaching homes in order to question the residents and win permission to search inside. Notably, this ruling echoes a dissent written last year by none other than Neil Gorsuch, before he was elevated to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case dates back to March 18, 2014, when Michael Frederick was jostled awake at 4 o’clock in the morning by loud, insistent knocking. Answered the door, Frederick was greeted by seven armed and vested officers from the Kent Area Narcotics Enforcement Team (KANET). KANET officers asked Frederick if he had any marijuana butter. After he consented to a search, officers found both marijuana butter and a batch of pot brownies in his home.
A little over an hour later, KANET officers repeated the knock and talk at the home of Todd Van Doorne. He agreed to a search, allowing law enforcement to find and confiscate marijuana butter. At the time, both Frederick and Van Doorne worked as jail guards in the Kent County Sheriff’s Department. Both have since lost their jobs and been charged with cannabis offenses.

]]> 2019-09-25 15:38:34 UTC https://padlet.com/pablooldaq1/enmiendas/wish/389542296