ZHUXINYANG,CHENXIN,HUANGWEN,XIEYUMENG 

2.How to accurately find the documents we need.

3.How to screen useful content in the article

4.How to describe the research gap more academically.

ZHUXINYANG,CHENXIN,XIEYUMENG,HUANGWEN

2.Collect literatures. Then search, filter  and accumulate relevant information 

3.Process the materials of the literature, combine their own experience and integrate into the subjective data.

4.Formulate the first draft

5.Modify the draft repeatedly and write the final essay
(Group 10) Chen Jielin; Li Chenwei; Luo Guanying; Zhan Xinying. 

 6.Write the paper
7.Review the work

 

Pan Jiaqi，Zhao Qing，

 Qiu Xiangyu,Lu Jing

2.Identify the literature that we will review

3.Analyze the literature

4.Summarize the literature in table or concept map format

5.Writing the review
Wang Zewei , Shi Kaiqi ,The Mayor,Wu Yao

Stage 1 Make a choice of the area of the research 

Stage 2 Search for a relevant liteature 

Stage 3 Read through the literature and select useful excerpts 

Stage 4 Make a thorough comprehension of the literature 

Stage 5 Constuct an outline and organize ideas 

Stage 6 Start writing the literature review

MIAO JINGJING WANG AI, ZU LI YANG WANG WENJIE

2 Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication and give credit to other researchers.

3 Show that the student has the ability to communicate the understanding of the statistical literature and its relationship to the proposed research.

Group members: FANG Yiran, LI Pan, LI Qinghua, LIN Ruoying

Zhan xinying 

Li chenwei 

Chen jielin 

Zhan xinying 

Li chenwei 

Chen jielin 

1. It helps the author to put the research in its current context, allowing you to compare it with other researches that have been done. 

2. It demonstrates how the research is different from what has been done before by past researchers. 

3. It helps show the knowledge and mastery of the field of study, as well as the depth of your reading. 

4. It is an essential tool to evaluate and criticize the existing academic system. 

ZOU Meiquan, CHEN Wenyan, XIA Haoge, WEI Renwei

1.     To identify the research project

2.     To provide a theoretical basis for the research, forming its context

3.     To provide insights into previous work

4.     To identify gaps and problems in the existing literature and thus providing a framework for further research

 

ZOU Meiquan, CHEN Wenyan, XIA Haoge, WEI Renwei 

Preliminary assessment of size and scope of available literature. 

Identify the extent and nature of past and current research. 

Focus on current research and knowledge. 

May offer new perspectives or identify areas for further research. 

Generic term. 

An examination of past and/or current publications. 

May cover a range of subjects with varying levels of completeness and comprehensiveness. 

A critical evaluation of extensively researched literature selected for its contribution to the field or understanding of concept. 

Describes degree of analysis with the hopes of deriving new theory.  

Searching for literature and selecting based on pre-established criteria (subjects, study design, methodology, outcomes, year of publication).

Summarizing what is found (or summarizing the evidence).

Searching for literature and selecting based on pre-established criteria (subjects, study design, methodology, outcomes, year of publication).

Following a standard of reporting (e.g., PRISMA)

Combines the data of multiples studies to improve estimates and/or to resolve uncertainties when individual studies disagree. 

 

ZOU Meiquan, CHEN Wenyan, XIA Haoge, WEI Renwei

 

Introduction: Gives a quick and basic idea of the topic of the literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern. 

Body: Contains the discussion of sources and is organized either chronologically, thematically, or methodologically. 

Conclusion/ Recommendations: Discuss what we have drawn from reviewing literature so far and discuss where the discussion might proceed. 

 

ZOU Meiquan, CHEN Wenyan, XIA Haoge, WEI Renwei

1. I think writing a good literature review need to conduct an extensive research. I want to know more sources or databases where we can find more information or journal articles from. 

2. While writing a literature review, we also need paraphrase lots of sources. I would like to know the approaches and matters needing attention of doing paraphrasing. 

3. When we are selecting literature, how can we choose more representative ones? 

4. Different literatures have different opinions, and I think it is very difficult to classify and elaborate different viewpoints. 

5. Do we need to put forward our own ideas and give corresponding evidences when writing the literature review? Or we just simply read, summarize and paraphrase the selected articles that are related to our chosen research topic.

ZOU Meiquan, CHEN Wenyan, XIA Haoge, WEI Renwei

 

ZOU Meiquan, CHEN Wenyan, XIA Haoge, WEI Renwei 

A good literature review has eight purposes. 

Deng Lishan; Fu Majiahui; Li Shuchen; Xing Yulu

3 It is a critical evaluation of literature published on a topic, i.e. in this type of writing, you will need to critique the arguments of other authors writing in your subject area.

4 Reviews the work of others and make proposed work relevant to previous works. The critique of the previous works provides a rationale for why the proposed work is necessary.

Li Xiaochen, Chen Chenlu, JIang Zining, Zhu Wenwen

Step 1: Identify your keywords. Think about your research question(s),and think about your contribution to the field, both in terms of knowledge and practice.

Step 2: Adjust your keywords

Step 3: Search and track. Pay attention on the criteria.

Step 4: Quick overlook (relatively). Fast identify key topics. Try to answer the question: in what topics/areas the research is focusing?

Step 5: Build your own data base. You could include: Title, Authors, Method, Context, Add themes at the end.

Step 6: Go deep in the readings, select and Write.
LI Xiaochen,Chen Chenlu,Jiang ZIning, Zhu Wenwen

 

Liu Xuezheng: Which type of literature review is relatively easier for a green hand? Or which type of literature review is recommended? During the information collection period, is there anything we should be aware of?

 

Chen Yuxuan: I would worry that the literature review is not rich enough because of the time and energy. As a result, in the latter part of the article, I did not have a good understanding of the basis of the predecessors, or the literature basis was not solid enough.

 

Zhu Jiafeng: I may have some difficulty analyzing the data and interpreting the author’s ideas. Inaccuracy or misunderstanding may frequently occur in my literature review. That’s what I’m concerned about.

 

Tan Zixin: The difficulty that I have met in writing a literature is the structure. Sometimes I feel confused how to organize and categorize the prior work in a proper way.

Group:
Zhu Jiafeng;
Tan Zixin;
Mou Yajing;
Chen Yuxuan;
Liu Xuezheng

1.Integrative review

Considering a form of research in an integrated way that create a new framework and perspective on the topic.

2.Argumentative review 

It usually examines literature selectively in order to support or refute a argument, deeply imbedded assumptions  or philosophical problem already established in the literature.However it can introduce the problem of bias.

3.Historical review 

It usually concentrate on the research throughout a period of time, starting with the first time about the issue, concept,theory,phenomena emerged in the literature and then tracing its evolution within the disciplines.

4.Systematic review

Overview of the existing evidences pertinent to a clearly formulated research question, which use per-specified and standardised method to identify appraise relevant research, and collect, analysis and report the data .

5.Methodological review 

We focus on how the person said it rather than what they said.

6.Theoretical review 

Concretely examining the corpus of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory,phenomena. The analysis can focus on the theoretical concept or the whole theory or framework. 


Rong Liying 
Tian Chendi
Yang Songying
Liao Huiyi