<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Norman Malcolm&#39;s Onto Arg by Claire</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-09-27 11:41:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-09-26 17:17:27 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127524777</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/135937284/9c4de75a803cc40f81f2e212699cf2bb/6d2b43cadf79d016375356841774331414f6744.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-09-30 13:49:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127524777</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Norman Malcolms Ontological Argument</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127676924</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. If God exists, his existence is necessary<br>2. If God does not exist, his existence is impossible<br>3. Either God exists or he does not exist<br>4. Gods existence is either necessary or impossible<br>5. Gods existence is possible (it is not impossible)<br>6. Therefore Gods existence is necessary</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-01 12:42:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127676924</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127677178</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padletuploads.blob.core.windows.net/aws/136142012/c6bb1d1c5a2548c44d79838ebb50afea/whizz_through_powerpoint_ontological_argument_16_638__1_.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-01 12:48:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127677178</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127727396</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) If God (TTWNCBC) doesn't exist then he cannot come into existence.<br>2) If God did come into existence he would either have to be caused or just happen become<br>3) This would make God limited, which according to our definition (TTWNGCBC) he is not.<br>4) God must then exist necessarily meaning nothing caused him to exist or can cease him to exist.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-02 14:52:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127727396</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127727944</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Malcolm supported Anselm's second argument because:<br>-The concept of God is the concept of a being whose existence is necessary.<br>-It is not possible to think of a being that is necessarily exists not existing.<br>- Therefore, Malcolm agrees, God must exist.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-02 15:01:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127727944</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127729202</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>If God comes into existence then he is dependent on whatever caused him to exist and God's existence cannot depend on anything for it to be TTWNGCBC</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-02 15:19:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127729202</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127732409</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1911-1990</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-02 16:06:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127732409</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127732452</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Harvard University</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-02 16:07:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/127732452</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/128087965</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>-American philosopher<br>-Studied first at Nebraska university and later at Harvard as a graduate&nbsp;<br>-Wrote 12 books on philosophy, including his reformulation of the ontological argument<br>-He argued that the original formulation of the ontological argument (proslogion 2) was just an inferior version of its second iteration&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-10-04 08:48:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/clairea/ho3uh61w8uz4/wish/128087965</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
