<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Histories of Contemporary Art 2 by Melletios</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl</link>
      <description> 3-5 pm with melletios </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-02-25 00:36:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2026-02-13 20:12:18 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Practice-Led Research .ME.</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1239000307</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Melletios Kyriakidis is a contemporary artist based on unceded, Gadigal Country. Since the mid 90's Melletios has exhibited extensively, including shows in London, Beijing, Rome, Hamburg, Melbourne and Sydney. He now displays his work on Large scale Architectural facades, on iconic buildings like the Sydney Opera House.<br><br>Melletios Kyriakidis' interdisciplinary work is grounded in the profound consequences of identity and exploration of the political body, immersed in intergenerational, diasporic trauma. It draws on the premise of the disassociated state of Flux and the effects of post-colonial structures.<br><br>Expounding on Structuralism, Melletios' work is part performative, part situational, adopting a transdisciplinary framework for his aesthetic. He rejects the contrived legacy, the decorative by-product of the institutional hierarchy.<br><br>Presently he is collaborating with others to produce work that involves discourse concerning the frenzied state of affairs that has encompassed the conservative identity of the contemporary epoch.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/1027740211/af05d8b02dbc3f8ae4b2166df863b4cd/26815367_1730965693592562_7716816606525614441_n.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-25 00:41:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1239000307</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>(choose one):</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756118991</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>1. Artists propose, test and experiment through their art to expose and critique systems, contexts,<br>identities and institutions. Using three artworks since 1960, demonstrate the unique ways artists<br>have researched and presented ideas that challenge the audience’s “knowledge”.<br>2. Postmodernist theory and art challenged the idea of the original artwork. Using two artworks from<br>1960-1990 discuss how the notion of the “original” was critiqued. How did these artworks comment<br>on broader visual and consumer culture?<br>3. Using three artworks (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique “gender”.<br>Compare and contrast these strategies.<br>4. Discuss the complexities of “post” colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse<br>three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.<br>5. Since the 1960’s artist have challenged traditional disciplinary boundaries. Analyse and contextualise<br>the reasons for the breakdown of disciplinary boundaries through the practices of two artists (since<br>the 1960’s).<br>6. Biennales and Art Fairs have proliferated since the 1990’s producing “global” contemporary art.<br>Discuss the effectiveness of three artworks (since 1990) that problematise and critique “global” art.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 04:54:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756118991</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756284345</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>2. Postmodernist theory and art challenged the idea of the original artwork. Using two artworks from<br>1960-1990 discuss how the notion of the “original” was critiqued. How did these artworks comment<br>on broader visual and consumer culture?&nbsp;<br>_______________________________<br>Nothing is original. Everything is an imitation of something (Plato)<br>Does it take pressure off of artists, if nothing is original?&nbsp;<br>We live in a culture where you have to strive for originality. Being an imitation is bad. Yet, if we do live in a post-modern world then we never can achieve that originality we strive for.<br><br>Or are our imitations original because of how we translate other imitations? Is our re-interpretation of a thing still the same thing?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:46:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756284345</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285209</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Question 3. Using three artworks (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique “gender”.<br>Compare and contrast these strategies.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:46:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285209</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285535</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Question 4: Discuss the complexities of “post” colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.<br>Artists: Daniel Boyd, Gordon Bennett, Joan Ross</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:46:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285535</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285663</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>First Choice<br><br>4. Discuss the complexities of “post” colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse<br>three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.<br><br>Second choice<br><br>5. Since the 1960’s artist have challenged traditional disciplinary boundaries. Analyse and contextualise<br>the reasons for the breakdown of disciplinary boundaries through the practices of two artists (since<br>the 1960’s).<br><br><strong>What does this question mean to me?<br><br></strong>4. This to me is about usurping/commoditisation/commercialisation of indigenous art. Conversely it is suppressing/whitewashing the history of colonisation<br><br>5. This to me is where painting and drawing lines blur or painting and collage blur</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:46:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285663</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285708</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:46:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756285708</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756286649</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>question 4 or 5 🤠</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:47:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756286649</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756286765</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>question 1 or4 </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:47:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756286765</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756288120</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. Postmodernist theory and art challenged the idea of the original artwork. Using two artworks from<br>1960-1990 discuss how the notion of the “original” was critiqued. How did these artworks comment<br>on broader visual and consumer culture?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:48:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756288120</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756288134</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Discuss the complexities of “post” colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.&nbsp;</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:48:08 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756288134</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>question 5?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756288431</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Since the 1960’s artist have challenged traditional disciplinary boundaries. Analyse and contextualise the reasons for the breakdown of disciplinary boundaries through the practices of two artists (since the 1960’s).&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:48:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756288431</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>q</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756289104</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2:Postmodernist theory and art challenged the idea of the original artwork. Using two artworks from 1960-1990 discuss how the notion of the “original” was critiqued. How did these artworks comment on broader visual and consumer culture?<br><br>4: Discuss the complexities of “post” colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:48:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756289104</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>maybe 1 or 4</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756289213</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. Artists propose, test and experiment through their art to expose and critique systems, contexts,<br>identities and institutions. Using three artworks since 1960, demonstrate the unique ways artists<br>have researched and presented ideas that challenge the audience’s “knowledge”.<br><br>4. Discuss the complexities of “post” colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse<br>three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:48:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756289213</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>2 or 3 </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756289415</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>2. Postmodernist theory and art challenged the idea of the original artwork. Using two artworks from1960-1990 discuss how the notion of the “original” was critiqued. How did these artworks commenton broader visual and consumer culture?<br>3. Using three artworks (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique “gender”.Compare and contrast these strategies.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:48:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756289415</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question 5 maybe</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756290275</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>5. Since the 1960’s artist have challenged traditional disciplinary boundaries. Analyse and contextualise the reasons for the breakdown of disciplinary boundaries through the practices of two artists (since the 1960’s).&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:49:25 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756290275</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756290825</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>1. Artists propose, test and experiment through their art to expose and critique systems, contexts,<br>identities and institutions. Using three artworks since 1960, demonstrate the unique ways artists<br>have researched and presented ideas that challenge the audience’s “knowledge”.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:49:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756290825</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question 3</title>
         <author>dzhrk27cdp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756293270</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. Using three artworks (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique “gender”.<br>Compare and contrast these strategies.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:51:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756293270</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1. Artists propose, test and experiment through their art to expose and critique systems, contexts, identities and institutions. Using three artworks since 1960, demonstrate the unique ways artists have researched and presented ideas that challenge the audience’s “knowledge”.     or     3. Using three artworks (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique “gender”. Compare and contrast these strategies.</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756294216</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:51:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756294216</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angelica </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756294236</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Question 2:<br></strong>Postmodernist theory and art challenged the idea of the original artwork. Using two artworks from<br>1960-1990 discuss how the notion of the “original” was critiqued. How did these artworks comment<br>on broader visual and consumer culture?<br><br><strong>What this question means to me: <br></strong>The way that I interpret this question is that nothing is original - we may think we have come up with some 'new and original' idea, but that's never the case. I look at it in the sense that what is 'new' becomes 'old' very quickly because of how fast trends, beliefs, values, etc. change. Leading to this idea in me that nothing is every truly 'original', or that new things don't last &gt; and this may have been what was being critiqued, or it may not be, but that's how I see it.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 06:51:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756294236</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>liwei</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756369497</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>question 2</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-21 07:30:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1756369497</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Veronica</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1759644255</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Question 6:<br>6. Biennales and Art Fairs have proliferated since the 1990’s producing “global” contemporary art.<br>Discuss the effectiveness of three artworks (since 1990) that problematise and critique “global” art.<br><br>What it means to me?<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-22 10:40:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1759644255</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What does this question mean to me?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1770679440</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>When researching, I had come across that are many types of boundaries within traditional art. As years pass, the growth and expansion of technology and society, artistic practices have also grown simultaneously. Since the 1960s, artists have implemented different styles and approaches towards art whilst still capturing the main concept of art. Therefore, with this question, it is trying to allow me to understand the evolution of boundaries within art. As I have grown up within a generation filled with the magnification of technology, I have been exposed to many artists which implement technology within their artist practices, challenging the boundary around the production of art. I have yet to gained a deeper and greater understanding of what this question is trying to get me to think about but so far this is all I have understood about the question.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-27 10:32:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1770679440</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>interpolation</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773729171</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:13:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773729171</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://www.artspace.org.au/program/exhibitions/2017/the-public-body-02/</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773734447</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.artspace.org.au/program/exhibitions/2017/the-public-body-02/" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:15:53 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773734447</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://www.mca.com.au/stories-and-ideas/claire-healy-sean-cordeiro-curatorial-essay/</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773735648</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.mca.com.au/stories-and-ideas/claire-healy-sean-cordeiro-curatorial-essay/" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:16:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773735648</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atwvTrHgOWY</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773738261</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atwvTrHgOWY" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:17:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773738261</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://www.4cs-conflict-conviviality.eu/post/conditions-of-entry-thoughts-on-pilvi-takalas-real-snow-white</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773741204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.4cs-conflict-conviviality.eu/post/conditions-of-entry-thoughts-on-pilvi-takalas-real-snow-white" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:18:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773741204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://www.karladickens.com.au/</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773757022</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.karladickens.com.au/" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:23:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773757022</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://melletios.com</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773821198</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://melletios.com" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 07:48:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1773821198</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Question choice</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1774868926</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I am conflicted between two questions.<br><br>Question 3: Using three art works (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique "gender". Compare and contrast these strategies.&nbsp;<br><br>The relationship this question has to be is my own personal interest in gender discourse, and how artists explore these questions in art. As a cisgender straight woman, I want to personally investigate how my own notions of gender can be challenged through artists I come across. The artists I have in mind is Bhenji Ra, Caroline Garcia and maybe Vanessa Beecroft as well.&nbsp;<br><br>Question 4: Discuss the complexities of "post" colonial art in ongoing settler colonies like Australia. Analyse three artworks (since 1960) within the broader context of settler colonisation.&nbsp;<br><br>I feel that I relate to this question as well, especially as a Filipina whose cultural memory involves the colonial settlement of Spain, the invasion of Japan, and occupation of America in the Philippines. Two artists that I feel connected to and feel relates to question is Caroline Garcia and Marikit Santiago.&nbsp;<br><br>Still on the fence but leaning more towards question 4 at this stage.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-28 14:37:06 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1774868926</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angelica - drafting thesis/introduction (UPDATED)</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1780366556</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Growing up as an identical twin, with a sister with a similar name, I’ve always had a weird mindset around what it means to be original. Still, as I grew older this weird feeling developed, as I have heard teachers say that nothing I ever do is ‘original’ for two reasons; jokingly, because of my twin sister, and secondly to critique my work. It’s not to say originality doesn’t exist, but rather how it is presented that it no longer seems original. The failure of Modernism saw the Postmodern world take over, seeing the emergence of a new dominant culture at play. Coincidentally, this period saw the end of individualism and individual subject, seeing the rise of pastiche -&nbsp; the imitation of “dead styles”. This new era criticized the idea of originality and visual, and consumer, culture through artworks in the 20th century.</div><div><br><br></div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-30 05:39:27 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1780366556</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angelica - how does this question relate to you?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1780372500</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I've always heard from teachers and family members growing up that 'Nothing you ever do is original - you may think it is, but someone has already thought of that before'. I guess I related to this question because I've grown up having a twin sister, which make me question whether one thing can ever truly be original. I mean I grew up with an identical twin, with  practically identical names (1 letter difference), so I have always had a weird relationship with the idea of originality. I wanted to explore how artists have questioned the notion of originality, and how this causes pressure for them to produce something - something that is 'unique' or 'original' - in a world/period that saw nothing as TRULY original.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-09-30 05:42:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1780372500</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791245898</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>3. Using three artworks (since 1960) explain two different creative strategies used to critique “gender”.<br>Compare and contrast these strategies.<br><br>What this means to me:<br>How gender especially from a female perspective/ created by female artists are depicted, and how there is such a large under representation of this in the art world and in some forms of art education </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 00:58:23 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791245898</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>https://open.spotify.com/episode/1aDLCo2XHvhU6Cf1g2yedv?si=7mcIr3yaQou7c019vgUcjA&amp;dl_branch=1&amp;nd=1</title>
         <author>melletios</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791906013</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://open.spotify.com/episode/1aDLCo2XHvhU6Cf1g2yedv?si=7mcIr3yaQou7c019vgUcjA&amp;dl_branch=1&amp;nd=1" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 05:36:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791906013</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Q</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791922248</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>1.</strong>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;<strong>Artists propose, test and experiment through their art to expose and critique systems, contexts, identities and institutions. Using three artworks since 1960, demonstrate the unique ways artists have researched and presented ideas that challenge the audience’s “knowledge”. <br><br></strong>What this means to me...<br>-Socialised self... My identity as an Asian Woman...?&nbsp;<br>-Feminism... intersectional feminism<br><br><br>Artist ideas:<br>-Eugenia Lim&nbsp;<br>-Bhenji Ra<br>-<br><br>THESIS<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 05:45:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791922248</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Artists:</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791922281</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Manzoni, Kunstlerscheisse, 1961 - <a href="https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/manzoni-artists-shit-t07667">https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/manzoni-artists-shit-t07667</a> <br>He sold cans with artist shit. To me he is questioning the consumption of culture/art and the capitalism it involves, but also originality, this can of shit only can come from him, but anyone could make this artwork, it does not require special skills.<br><br><br>AND<br><br>Cristo, 1963 – wrapped magazine showing mona lisa with mustache&nbsp; - <a href="https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/christo-der-speigel-magazine-wrapped-p07640">https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/christo-der-speigel-magazine-wrapped-p07640<br></a>Originality, when it is wrapped it is new, even though the original is not from him. You wrap it to consume it.<br><br>OR<br>Cristo, wrapped cans - <a href="https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/christo-wrapped-cans-part-of-inventory-t03290">https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/christo-wrapped-cans-part-of-inventory-t03290<br></a>Connected to Manzoni (cans) - same implications of consumption <br><a href="https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/christo-wrapped-cans-part-of-inventory-t03290"><br></a><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/manzoni-artists-shit-t07667" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 05:45:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791922281</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why I picked question 1</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791971544</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In relation to my on practice I like to draw hyperrealistic portraits of family and friends. I find myself having a bizarre relationship with the final works I produce as I draw exactly what I see, therefore is that even original? Is it an aesthetic looks?&nbsp;What makes it original? adding difference mediums? </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-05 06:10:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1791971544</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Ideas</title>
         <author>chrismulia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1802206302</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The decay of lying by Oscar Wilde<br>The only real art is the art that never existed<br>Inspiration ≠ imitation ?<br>Mimesis μίμησις<br>mimesis as the perfection, and imitation of nature<br>imagination</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-08 10:27:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1802206302</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>why question 2</title>
         <author>chrismulia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1802207131</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-08 10:28:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1802207131</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angelica - Academic Essay Progress</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1806306204</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To make things easier, I thought I'd just put a link here for some of the work I've done because I don't want to make such a lengthy post :)&nbsp;<br><br>https://docs.google.com/document/d/13TdGjITtd6TbTQcBBJcBFJWrQi7Y1c55yt91EbcqCCY/edit?usp=sharing </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://docs.google.com/document/d/13TdGjITtd6TbTQcBBJcBFJWrQi7Y1c55yt91EbcqCCY/edit?usp=sharing" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-11 00:46:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1806306204</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Angelica some artist/artwork research notes</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1809573290</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ul><li>‘<em>Marilyn Diptych’ </em>(1962) by Andy Warhol :<ul><li>Demonstrates a part of popular culture's fascination with the celebrity, the repeated coloured prints of her face against the monochrome prints portray Marilyn’s presence in the media, and the long-lasting fascination she has left on people.</li><li>Also is a comment on mass production and how this causes there to be a lack of authenticity/originality because is everything is mass-produced; like a factory, producing the same product over and over again.</li></ul></li><li>‘<em>Untitled Film Still #21’ </em>(1978) by Cindy Sherman:<ul><li>Depicts a girl dressed in fashion from the 1950s in a black and white photograph. The series of photographs represent a lack of originality as they imitate old films - we feel like we can recognise them, the black and white film seems nostalgic to us - plays into ‘pastiche’ (imitation of dead styles) which was quite popular during the Postmodernist art era.&nbsp;</li><li>Borrowing from historic styles and reflects the fluidity of identity</li><li>Also questions the representation of women in the media and cinema (women were usually depicted as victims, pieces to move the story along for the heroic male).</li><li>Leaves the audience wondering whether they have seen this film before? Or is sit just a copy of something we’ve seen before? (bringing in this question on whether anything is truly original???).</li></ul></li><li>‘<em>Untitled (I shop therefore I am)’ </em>(1987) by Barbara Kruger<ul><li>Critiques Rene Descartes’ statement ‘I think therefore I am’, by demonstrating how our identity is made up by consumerism - we show our identity by dressing in the latest trends, we can’t help it, we have to buy what’s new, to CONSUME the latest and greatest.</li><li>Focuses on the image, the spectacle, and questions whether anyone is ever original/authentic if we’re all dressed by the same trends and fashion. Consumerism drives our identity, no longer our agency to do what we want. In some sense, this still applies today.</li><li>Appropriates/imitates mass media advertisements evident in the use of graphic block prints and colours (black, red, and white).&nbsp;</li></ul></li></ul><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-12 03:57:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1809573290</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Draft intro</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1843713960</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>“We are in a world/time that uses the languages of ‘diversity’, ‘chaos’, ‘multiculturalism’, ‘pluralism’ – the languages of difference, the non-unified, the pandemonium – not the languages of order, regularity, conformity.”<a>[1]</a></div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>“Eurocentrism, hegemony and colonialism (re-)produce “legitimate” knowledge and knowers in the Western world.” <a>[2]</a> In the context of colonial Australia, this ‘knowledge’ typically centres white epistemologies that maintain the status quo – the equilibrium of White supremacy and the incessant ‘othering’ of People of Colour. This essay will examine the unique ways contemporary Australian artists Makeda Duong, Eugenia Lim and ___ research and present ideas that challenge systems, contexts, identities and institutions that centralise white knowledge. <em>Mixed Race Sweater</em>, <em>The Australian Ugliness </em>and __ each expose and critique specific structures such as the “penetrative white gaze”, “ethics and aesthetics” of&nbsp; Australian architecture and ___. Unique strategies - textiles, performance and __ - help reveal the diversity of histories, narratives and plurality of identity which is often unacknowledged by the white hegemonic system of knowledge. These artists explore different notions of identity and thus reveal the multifarious and complex nature of the so called ‘Asian Australian’ experience.</div><div>&nbsp;</div><div>As a biracial Asian Australian this essay also functions as a personal investigation into the methodologies of other artists that are ethnically, culturally and/or legally linked to the continent of Asia. Within the context of white Australia these artists are repeatedly with terms such as ‘Asian Australian’ having a tendency to “disguise the enormous diversity of cultures, languages, beliefs, and political systems”<a>[3]</a>. How can I rethink and restructure my own knowledge systems and where can I locate myself in a broader art context?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-10-26 03:05:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1843713960</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>eeeeaaaarly draft statement for essay</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1860459920</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In the 21st century the mass culture machine is inescapable in its ubiquity. Images are able to be replicated infinitely and distributed en masse; often to accumulate capital. This brings into question the idea of the “original artwork” and its integrity. In the late 20th century, appropriation artists engaged with the ideas of [Roland Barthes and Walter Benjamin] in order to examine and critique the concept of the original artwork. This came at a time when artists and critics began to fully comprehend the undisputed pervasiveness&nbsp; the capitalist culture machine.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-02 03:01:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1860459920</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>draft statement</title>
         <author>chrismulia</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1861485998</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Artists always try to come up with original ideas for their work, very rare they would like to imitate someone's else. As a result of the rise of postmodernism, ideas of originality has become vague. Take an example from Marcel Duchamp's readymade artworks and Andy Warhol's advertising artworks that change the definition of real art. Some said that Duchamp's art is not a true work of art, same as Warhol's work, in contrary to Duchamp's belief that concept as something that is more important rather than the object. This essay talks about ... tbc</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-02 12:41:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/melletios/hnp1vlzjdta0tcbl/wish/1861485998</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
