However, it is a shame that they need this kind of event to start cleaning the city and the river. Lots of the actions that take place should have been made earlier.

Nevertheless, thos actions and the structures build will be usefull for a long time and it is a good point for all french people.

During technical tests carried out on Friday, and filmed by environmental associations, the barge planned for the installation of the new judges' tower broke coral. "What had been planned as a test went badly wrong, and I regret that like everyone else. There are two possible attitudes: either you give up or you don't do the Games any more. That's not my mentality, and I don't think that's what the people of Teahupoo and Tahiti want", declared Moetai Brotherson on local television channel TNTV.

Moetai Brotherson decided to cancel the tests scheduled in his presence on Saturday and to suspend the work that was due to start on Monday 4 December, ruling out the use of the old wooden tower as the associations wished. "Today, we broke some coral, tomorrow, if we use these old devices, we are potentially putting lives at risk, and I will not take that responsibility", he explained.

I think it makes a real promotion for France so that we can resume notoriously travel after the covid but it is not necessarily beneficial that it was necessary to move our beautiful capital to be able to welcome the athletes and their supporters who will come of course also to visit the country

Positive: Income generation from luxury real estate, job creation in construction, stimulating the tourism and leisure industry.

Negative: Financial risks linked to the viability of the project, increased economic dependence on the luxury real estate and tourism industry.

Environmental impact :

Positive: Potential for green infrastructure improvements, integration of sustainable technologies.

Negative: Destruction of marine ecosystem, construction-related greenhouse gas emissions, pollution risks.

Social impact :

Positive: Creation of local jobs, improvement of public infrastructure, stimulation of the service sector.

Negative: Displacement of local populations, safety risks for workers, gentrification and social exclusion.

Cultural impact :

Positive: Promotion of local culture, cultural exchanges with international visitors.

Negative: Risk of excessive commercialization, loss of cultural authenticity, modification of local social fabric.

but there are still negative points, it is a project that will cost the country dearly and moreover the construction the snombre of tourism and people for this event will have a big impact on our environment

The impact of the olympics games could be positive for the country's economy, and also because there will be an increase in employment.

But it can also be a negative point, because of all the people who will be coming and creating more pollution in Paris.

First for the local population beaucause actually Paris welcome a lot of tourists wich is good for economy but the city is already too frequented by tourists, and during olypics games it will be worst.

Also for the cost of living, the prices will a lot increase. And finally for the ecology and the health of the athletes all the ideas ae not always good.

The 2024 Olympics will help France and Paris a lot, in terms of visibility but it is also an opportunity to clean the Seine by making it cleaner and to create housing but there is also a negative side since Paris is not prepared enough to accommodate so many people.

But all good things have bad ones.

For example, we can take the surf which has to be in Tahiti but a lot of people aren’t agree because of the danger for the sea and the reef. People advice to do it in Hossegor but this is just an idea.

It’s important that JO isn’t a danger for locals or environnement.

Also, there is an impact on real estate for the price of the rent but also for locals who are force to rent because Paris has no more space and don’t want to build other infrastructures. This is an impact on way of life, not also on nature.

The positive aspect is that the city will be cleaned, and Parisian will be abble to enjoy swimming in the Seine. Futhermore, it will send a good image of France internationnaly, and it will attract a lot of people.

But is the positive aspect worth it ? Parisian will have struggles to find appartments, and to pay rent. Most of the people living in Paris will have to leave during the games. Moreover, The olympic games are not at all sustainable, as we need to build new infrastructures that will only be used for a few months.

However, like every major event of this magnitude, large limits are observable and cannot be ignored. The first and most representative of the problems encountered each time. Indeed many polemics surf around the events planned at Teahupo'o. Unsurprisingly, the organization of events in nature like surfing competition, destroys the environment without too much worry. The alarm calls come mainly from the premises and no real solution is found.

Thus we can wonder if the couple economy and sport is really favorable to that between respect for the environment and sport