8.2: Thesis Statements by Charles Levin https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0 Post your thesis statement here! en-us 2021-01-12 19:28:11 UTC 2021-01-14 11:12:09 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/270f.png Nijah Williams https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080351154 Thesis: In the passages , both poets develop point of view by talking about war, although the intended effect of “Dulce et Decorum Est; Who's for the Game?” is negative, while “Who's for the Game?” intends to get people to join the war.
Evidence (Similarity):
From ,Dulce et Decorum Est; Who's for the Game?.“In all my dreams before my helpless sight”
“He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning”
“If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace”

From ,Who’s for the Game?.
“Who’s for the game, the biggest that’s played”,
“The red crashing game of a fight?”
“Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid?”
“And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?”
Evidence (Difference): 
“His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin,”
“If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood”
“Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs”
Bitter as the cud”
“Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues, -”
Evidence (Similarity OR Difference):
“For there’s only one course to pursue”,
“ Your country is up to her neck in a fight”,
“And she’s looking and calling for you”.






 


]]> 2021-01-12 19:30:42 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080351154 jeremiah Myers https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080352659 Thesis: In the passages, both poets develop the point of view by telling reasons on why people shouldn’t joun the army . Although,the intended effect of Dulce et Decorum Est is to reframe people to join the army, While Who’s for the game is about why it is or it's not worth fighting for your country.

]]> 2021-01-12 19:31:01 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080352659 jordan jones https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080356743 in the passages, both poets develop the point of view by explaining the reason why u shouldn't join the army, although the intended effect of dulce et decorum est;is to keep people from joining the army, while who's for the game? is to g]]> 2021-01-12 19:31:53 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080356743 Tianna Matthews https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080360144 In the passages ,both poets develop point of view by, explaining why and why not to go to war ; although, the intended effect of  “Dulce et Decorum Est” is more about stopping people from going to war , while “Whos for the game” intends to help and support the idea of going to war. Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid? And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?”( from Whos for the game) Evidence (Difference): Whos for the game 
“Your country is up to her neck in a fight, And she’s looking and calling for you”

Evidence (Similarity OR Difference):  Dulce et decorum est 
“His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin, 20 If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs Bitter as the cud “






]]> 2021-01-12 19:32:37 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080360144 kayla gannaway https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080361848 in these passages both poets  develop point of view by war . although the intended effect of  dulce et decorous est . While who’s for the game talk about how you should be at war.

]]> 2021-01-12 19:32:59 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080361848 Saniya Lakey https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080366125 In the passages, both poets develop the point of view by saying why people should or should not join the army. Although, the intended effect of Dulce  et Decorum talks about why people should not join the army, "Who's for the game" talks about why people should join the army.
1. ]]> 2021-01-12 19:33:51 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080366125 Lauryn https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080372484 In the passages,both poets develop point of view by   using multiple reasons  to persuade the reader of their opinion although the intended effect of dulce et decorum is to persuade other to not join.while “who’s for the game inspired people to join 


]]> 2021-01-12 19:35:08 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080372484 Jordyn Butler https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080375647 In the passaeges they both have diffrent perspectives ]]> 2021-01-12 19:35:49 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080375647 kendarius rice krice9066 https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080389945 thesis;in the passages,they both have different perspectives and explain in a different way.They show why and why not they should join the army.They also give multiple reasons.]]> 2021-01-12 19:38:50 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080389945 Kaleb Johnson https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080398329  in these passages,both stories talk about 2 different points of view of war “dulce et decorum est;whos for the game?”in cons and “whos for the game” is the pros of war.

“Many lost their boots,limped on,blood-shod. All went lame all blind;”

“He plunges at me guttering,choking and drowning”

‘Who wants to turn himself into the show”




]]> 2021-01-12 19:40:35 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080398329 Roman Smith https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080400270 In the passages, both poets develop point of view by a person in the war; although, the intended effect of “decorum est" is dark, while “who’s for the game” courage you into war. 

]]> 2021-01-12 19:40:58 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080400270 Aaron Mckline https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080425222 In the passages, both of the stories, they was two different stories of the wars, ]]> 2021-01-12 19:46:04 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1080425222 https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084680969 2021-01-13 19:27:08 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084680969 karrington. https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084681964 In the passage , both poets develop point of views by giving multiple statements and reasoning on why people should and should not go to war. Although the intended effect of dulce et decorum est is negative, who's for the game? is getting people to join.

]]> 2021-01-13 19:27:21 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084681964 Moriyah https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084753545 In the passages, both poets develop point of view by explaining why and why you shouldn't go to war; although, the intended effect of "Who's For The Game" is to persuade people to go to war, while "Dulce et Decorum Est" is to persuade people to not go to war.

Evidence(similarities):From "Who's From The Game" It states "And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?"
"Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid?"

Evidence from: "Dulce et Decorum Est" It sates "Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots of gas-shells dropping softly behind."
"He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning."

Evidence (differences):From "Who's From The Game" It states "But you’ll come on all right – For there’s only one course to pursue,"

Evidence From: "Dulce et Decorum Est" It sates "Many had lost their boots, 5
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame, all blind;"

Evidence (similar or different):From "Who's From The Game" It states "Your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she’s looking and calling for you."

Evidence (similar or different):"Dulce et Decorum Est" It sates "If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs Bitter as the cud"


]]> 2021-01-13 19:43:56 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084753545 martayvius https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084755451 in the passage , both poets develop point of views by someone in war ,they talk about the differences if u should or should not and they give you the pros and cons ]]> 2021-01-13 19:44:22 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084755451 Zaniya Johnson https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084758161 Im the passage ]]> 2021-01-13 19:45:02 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084758161 Terrell Crosson https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084763773 In this passage both poets are explaining why you should go to war and why you shouldn't the first passage us giving details on why you should and the second passage is giving details on why you shouldn't]]> 2021-01-13 19:46:25 UTC https://padlet.com/clevin7/hhxxdz2o0a16ulb0/wish/1084763773