https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff Made with a stroke of good luck en-us 2021-05-26 13:55:26 UTC 2025-11-17 22:24:31 UTC hello@padlet.com clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547102 Work with (i.e., ID and meet with) the most productive current partnerships to determine why our partnership with them is valuable – now – and whether a National surveilance would be beneficia to them in the future. This may provide insight into how to approach other less productive partnerships. 

]]> 2021-05-26 14:20:29 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547102 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547303 Do this in stages. Begin with a questionnaire survey for a larger group and then winnow down the possibilities.]]> 2021-05-26 14:20:32 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547303 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547452 Develop a base cooperative agreement delineating NWHC's surveillance goals and outlining the services we will be able to provide. Review agreement with individual partners or small groups of partners, assess partner buy-in, and determine whether there are critical partner needs that are being overlooked. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:20:35 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547452 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547601 Listening sessions or structured conversations where we present how we're changing and why, and then hear out our partners about their concerns could also work - but not if we need them to use their resources to participate. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:20:37 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547601 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547737 Pilot with key (DOI) partner(s) to show proof of concept and creating a glide path to full implementation. Identify influencers with the states who also can be test cases. Identify impediments to implementation through workshop.]]> 2021-05-26 14:20:39 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561547737 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561555784 Successful current examples, ie. WNS, CWD the costs and benefits.  Work out details of a potential example that would be meaningful either regionally or nationally.

]]> 2021-05-26 14:22:34 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561555784 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556419 We need an elevator speech presentation that summarizes our strategy and conclusions. 

]]> 2021-05-26 14:22:44 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556419 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556554 Develop a presentation (to be used at workshop or during more individualized partner meetings) that summarizes our work to date with Goal 2.1 group, and that summarizes both benefits and inherent biases/shortcomings of the scanning surveillance that NWHC has historically done. Demonstrate how by pursuing new directions, we can achieve more.]]> 2021-05-26 14:22:46 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556554 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556781 I think we could provide what we've done so far as a basis for discussion/starting place (different goals for surveillance, cost/benefit analysis - just keep our ranking to ourselves). It is common in these types of workshops to provide background and side-bars, and what we have developed will be useful in defining those.]]> 2021-05-26 14:22:49 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556781 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556914 Use the "outward facing" stuff in a wildlife health perspective and show how enhanced surveillance can better inform management decisions than uncoordinated presence/absence efforts.  So not trying to just educate, but show why it will better meet management needs. Maybe use outside person too (e.g., Craig Stephens).]]> 2021-05-26 14:22:51 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561556914 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561557559 Work with limited number of partners-the ones we know are interested in drivers- USFWS (Sam Gibbs anyway) seems interested in this more than just understanding morbidity and mortality.]]> 2021-05-26 14:23:01 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561557559 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561557849 Use it to demonstrate why drivers will help them with the objective of improving wildlife health. I'm not sure why situational awareness is so important to them. I don't know if they get pressure from public, agency to know what something is or whether they just haven't thought that much about there being more we can do with surveillance other than document why things are dying and what new diseases are on the horizon.]]> 2021-05-26 14:23:05 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561557849 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561583684 At a minimum move us off simply ‘situational awareness’ and provide an example that can be used as a demonstration project.]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:17 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561583684 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561583889 Without an understanding of what is "usual", we will not have the understanding of what are meaningful changes. So some degree of surveillance is needed. Can we use historic and possibly simulated data and test how different surveillance quotas/strategies affect our ability to provide situational awareness?

]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:19 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561583889 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561584278 I think that we need to maintain some form of general surveillance - could focus on high-priority/larger events (increase to 20-, 50-, or 100-carcass acceptance criteria) or could be based on general surveillance within risk-prioritized nodes - and would like to also roll out a pilot project. I think we can engage and transition partners to new model through cooperative agreements. Perhaps, we can roll out the idea of paying for enhanced services?]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:26 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561584278 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561584465 I don't mind if we need to keep some passive surveillance for high priority events. However, I do want to make sure that we choose at least one of the science objectives to move towards. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:28 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561584465 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561585780 I think the minimum objectives are those that have been derived through this team. I don't think we need to make everyone happy, but I don't think that is possible. We probably don't do that now.]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:48 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561585780 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561585956 As long as the objectives of the surveillance results in increased ability to take action I'd be happy. In theory drivers should be more useful than situational awareness but it seems like we know the big drivers of disease (habitat loss, human encroachment, global trade and travel) and haven't been able to take action so stop or slow these factors so I'm not sure it's a panacea but it may be a step in the right direction.]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:51 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561585956 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561586103 I think we should keep most of them national scope/impact, identification of drivers, collections of somewhat systematic presence/absence data, attempts at evaluating management scenarios, the only reason to change would be if someone convinced us that doing something different would result in better management of diseases]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:53 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561586103 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561586465 use our objectives as gold standards for our future efforts. try to bring partners around to our objectives, "weight" them heavily if we have a workshop or conversation with partners regarding future directions. Engage partners with the trade-offs versus benefits (have them add their own perceptions to the graph)]]> 2021-05-26 14:29:58 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561586465 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561586740 show how we can meet multiple objectives. Try to lead them to the conclusion that this is what they want. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:30:02 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561586740 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561592477 NWHC will compare our surveillance objectives with an estimated 'buy in' by our partners. Will the juice be worth the squeeze?]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:27 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561592477 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561592645 Ideally, the workshop will identify common objectives and priorities. The opinions expressed should also be weighed against what is practical/feasible. Together they inform but should not dictate our new strategy.

]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:29 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561592645 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561592995 Weigh our objectives and partners' objectives to identify where we overlap and how many partners we will we be able to engage depending on which idea we choose. Use this process to start making initial decisions; then continue to proactively communicate with partners.]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:34 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561592995 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593155 I think this should be a consent or consultative decision. Consensus would take too long, and I doubt we'd get it because we have too many partners. So we'll hear them out, and weigh what they have to say, but in the end the decision on what we accept for submissions is ours. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:36 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593155 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593297 The data collection and analysis should be framed as a means to inform the implementation of our strategic plan and new national surveillance strategy. So, aimed at identifying impediments/barriers to implementation, key influencers, etc.]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:38 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593297 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593514 Ideally I'd like for this to be a consultative process whereby we consult with partners but make the decision. If there isn't agreement among partners then we use data to understand that the barriers and facilitators to implementation will be.]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:41 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593514 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593753 Identify impediments to success, and strategize how to overcome them. Decisions regarding which partners might be amenable to start pilot projects with. Information can be used to help "sell" the project if feedback is positive. Determining if partner objectives that are outside the scope of NWHC's objectives can be incorporated without significant loss of resources. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:31:44 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561593753 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561596752 Unless we are willing and able to 'go it alone' on national surveillance we need partner 'buy in' and that entails identifying and respecting their objectives.]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:26 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561596752 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561596976 Given the limited USGS budget (there are RO1 given to PI's that is bigger than the whole Center's budget), I feel that we need partner commitment in order for any one project to be  adequately funded to the degree that is needed.

]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:29 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561596976 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597137 Prioritize partners who's objectives align with ours. As a starting point, perhaps this will be enough for us to initiate a surveillance pilot project (i.e., don't need to implement entire project up front).]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:31 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597137 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597318 My personal opinion would be to prioritize the partners who's objectives most closely align with what we want....but I suppose we need to think carefully about whether HQ sees all partners the same or if certain partners are more key to our success than others.]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:34 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597318 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597525 We have our mission, goals and objectives laid out in the strategic plan, action plan, etc. So, I believe we should roll this out in phases focusing first on key partners based on political considerations, scope of mandate, likelihood of aligning with our efforts, etc.]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:37 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597525 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597668 I think we should prioritize partners that most closely align with our objectives and I think this is probably USFWS.  It would be easier to figure out how to make them happy than 50 individual states. I'd love for the partner group to help us figure out what the barriers to implementation are and how we overcome them. I'm not sure what this looks like though.]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:39 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597668 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597815 I think we should prioritize partners based on who is mostly willing to support us in achieving our objectives. That might be $$$, or personnel, or just positive messaging to other partners. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:32:41 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561597815 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601005 Yes. the benefits are perhaps working closely with a smaller group of partners and having a successful demonstration project to point out as evidence of the value of surveillance as opposed to situational awareness. The disadvantrage is it will likely be slower. Possibly others, Davis, SWDS, NE will follow the lead and develop their own regional approach.]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:26 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601005 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601303 Nodes, regional or disease-centric focus, are a good way to demonstrate the new strategy. Early successes would draw in new partner that can then expand our scope in a stepwise fashion.

]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:30 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601303 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601577 Yes. This is consistent with a pilot approach. Will allow us to work out kinks, identify successes, and potentially build support for broader-scale implementation.]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:35 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601577 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601809 I think we have to (as far as rolling it out), but I think we need to be clear with ALL our partners that we're doing so. Because there will be partners who aren't included in the initial pilot, but then feel that they can't have their say or won't buy in when we try to expand it. ]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:38 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601809 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601940 Yes, I would focus at the regional scale. I think this provides the foundation for showing proof of concept, building political support, and ironing out the "wrinkles".]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:40 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561601940 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561602084 Yes, I think we need to start with node/region. The benefits are that trying to figure out what to collect and how useful it is will be easier if we're doing it for a small number of partners. It would potentially allow us more time to figure out what to do with routine submissions (could keep taking them from other regions). A challenge could be that we might not be able to see patterns for drivers with a regional node.]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:43 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561602084 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561602518 yeah the Katie and Dan laid out the pros, the cons are that you may end up with a pilot project that no one outside the regional area sees at relevant to their area (even if it is) for some reason or another. If it means putting some partners on hold for a few years we could lose some connections. We don't want to become the Regional Science Center. So I think it is necessary but we have to be careful.]]> 2021-05-26 14:33:48 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561602518 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561711450 Identify targeted surveillance projects with partners with immediate needs.  Develop a smaller-than-national scale project where the partner + us both brings objectives to demonstrate how we can do both and how much resources its takes]]> 2021-05-26 15:00:12 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561711450 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561711845 1. ID who we are communicating to.  Communication to partners who use the information a different surveillance approach will produce will be different from higher level positions with partners or USGS.

partners (users of information): how does this impact a decision or resource allocation or something else they do on a day to day basis.

administrators: Costs and Benefits]]> 2021-05-26 15:00:17 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561711845 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561712252 Ask and get a solid answer for: "what are you using this information for?" aka: as far as we can still connect surveillance activities to management or policy actions. Not so far as to just produce situational awareness or research knoweldge]]> 2021-05-26 15:00:21 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561712252 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561712607 My suggestions: create one workshop goal/session to identify a small group to decide/implement the workshop outcomes (where I'm thinking outcomes is compilation/ranking/etc of partner perspectives). This group must include some partners]]> 2021-05-26 15:00:25 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561712607 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561712988 Partners. but I'm not really clear what the distinction is]]> 2021-05-26 15:00:28 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561712988 clwhite6 https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561713403 nothing to add to above]]> 2021-05-26 15:00:34 UTC https://padlet.com/clwhite6/hdhbxx3olg7yupff/wish/1561713403