https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7 en-us 2022-08-26 11:38:38 UTC 2022-08-29 22:01:10 UTC hello@padlet.com https://padlet.net/icons/png/270d.png https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272669663 My muddiest point is trying to find what I should write about, like the topic sentences and such ]]> 2022-08-26 13:18:26 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272669663 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670210 The muddiest point for me is creating commentary.]]> 2022-08-26 13:18:59 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670210 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670245 The difference between sophistication (besides fancy language) and commentary ]]> 2022-08-26 13:19:01 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670245 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670306 Commentary, the why this choice and the how does this work. ]]> 2022-08-26 13:19:05 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670306 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670340 Explaining why an author/speaker uses a specific rhetorical choice.]]> 2022-08-26 13:19:08 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670340 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670420 Finding the "how" and "why" in commentary

]]> 2022-08-26 13:19:13 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670420 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670682 I would say my muddiest point is the ability to include a perfect amount of extra evidence into my commentary.]]> 2022-08-26 13:19:29 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272670682 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671042 Commentary, why the author chose that rhetorical device and how it relates to the purpose]]> 2022-08-26 13:19:49 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671042 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671228 my muddiest point is sophistication, i don't understand it fully]]> 2022-08-26 13:20:01 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671228 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671555 The muddiest point for me is the why, and how of the commentary. ]]> 2022-08-26 13:20:24 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671555 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671602 My muddiest point was probably being specific with my context.]]> 2022-08-26 13:20:26 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272671602 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272672457 Putting enough commentary and the “how” in my thesis.]]> 2022-08-26 13:21:21 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272672457 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272672598 I think my muddiest point is commentary and rhetorical analysis.]]> 2022-08-26 13:21:29 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272672598 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272672723 I think commentary is hardest for me mainly because I’m not sure what to write after I give my evidence. I thought commentary was there to summarize the evidence I gave but in the essay they had explained it and stated why the speaker had stated it.]]> 2022-08-26 13:21:37 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2272672723 https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2275326864 My muddiest point would be properly connecting my evidence with my commentary and it flowing well.]]> 2022-08-29 22:01:10 UTC https://padlet.com/teresa_lamar/h6sn3cla83id4vj7/wish/2275326864