[Room 4] HSSRP 2025 Project Review: Comments from Panellists and participants by GEB HSSRP

Leave comments for SCGSP2 here.

geb_hssrp — 2025-07-07 07:15:03 UTC

Leave comments for RIP3 here.

geb_hssrp — 2025-07-07 07:15:03 UTC

Leave comments for RVHSP2 here.

geb_hssrp — 2025-07-07 07:15:03 UTC

Instructions on how to leave feedback

geb_hssrp — 2025-07-07 07:15:03 UTC

To add a comment to a post, click the space that says: Add comment. Alternatively, you can add a post by pressing the "+" under the project tag heading you are commenting on. When leaving a comment, please begin with your project tag/name.
For example:
Dr Smith: this group has demonstrated extensive knowledge of the subject. However, you can try to make more eye contact with the audience.
XYZP9: the presentation was well organised but the slides were too cluttered and difficult to read. You spoke energetically!

Feedback Guidelines (for Panellist Reference)

geb_hssrp — 2025-07-07 07:15:03 UTC

Thank you for spending time with us this morning to help our young researchers! You may consider giving feedback to projects based on their presentation delivery and on the following points:

1. Mastery of subject knowledge

- Does the project demonstrate extensive knowledge of subject?

- Is there convincing evidence to support ideas and conclusions?

- Are all questions answered with clear elaboration?

2. Organisation of presentation

- Is the organisation of the argument clear and logical?

3. Significance of project

- Is the project relevant or important to the field?

- Will it make a significant contribution?

~ HSSRP Organising Committee.

Leave comments for NJCP2 here.

geb_hssrp — 2025-07-07 07:15:03 UTC

2025-08-16 02:20:33 UTC

RVP2: The presentation was very clear and engaging, and it was quite easy to understand the findings and discussions of the studies. I find the direction this research takes to be very unique and important!

2025-08-16 02:34:55 UTC

Dr Robbie: An interesting presentation. More elaboration on participant selection and the considerations for the French and English names could deepen readers’ appreciation of the impact of language, word choice and visual design.

2025-08-16 02:36:35 UTC

Dr Robbie: The study demonstrates significant effort in the data collection modes. To enhance communication of impact, there could be a discussion on how the specific findings may inform future research on signage in other cultural and commercial areas.

2025-08-16 02:36:37 UTC

RVP2: The findings and discussion segment was incredibly elaborate and detailed, and it shows that the group has extensive knowledge in the field of LL. I am curious about whether having all 63 participants in the survey participate in a semi-structured interview in addition to the chosen 6 with systematic sampling, would affect the research findings and discussion.

2025-08-16 02:37:31 UTC

Dr Robbie: An interesting study examining perspectives on the linguistic landscape. As the 25-64 years participant group is rather large and wide-ranging, you could consider a more fine-grained analysis of the data collected.

2025-08-16 02:58:08 UTC

Dr Robbie: A clearly delivered and organized presentation. More elaboration on the implications of the study could enhance communication of its significance and potential impact.

2025-08-16 03:03:13 UTC

RVP2: I really like how this study integrates unique research aspects in sociology and language and terms such as CCT, to construct a well-written, elaborate paper on interdisciplinary research.