<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Remake of CCOT of the US Supreme Court by Madison Delp</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c</link>
      <description>Working with your group you will create a &quot;timeline&quot; of significant court cases. Using the cases you have to choose from in class, research them, add them to the proper category with a summary. </description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:07:34 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2021-02-03 18:08:38 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Your boxes should look something like the one below for each court case. </title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154430796</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<ol><li>Date</li><li>Constitutional issue (posed as a question)</li><li>Decision (answer to question)</li><li>Votes for majority/dissenting opinion</li></ol><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:07:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154430796</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Marbury v. Madison</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154430799</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Date: 1803<br>Questions: Which branch of government is most powerful?<br>Decision: They are all equal as this cases establishes the ability of the Supreme Court to determine the Constitutionality of a law<br>Votes: 4 majority<br>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; 2 dissenting&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:07:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154430799</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities </title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154430804</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>At the end of each column provide an evaluation of what has changed or what has stayed the same over time for the given category. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:07:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154430804</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Abington School District v. Schempp</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154465934</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1963<br>Question: Did the Pennsylvania law requiring public school students to participate in classroom religious exercises violate the religious freedom of students as protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments?</div><div>Decision: Public schools can not bible reading or prayer due to the first amendment. <br>Votes: 8 for and 1 against</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:13:21 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154465934</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Bethel v. Frasier</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154502283</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:1986<br>Question: Does the First Amendment prevent a school district from disciplining a high school student for giving an inappropriate speech at a high school assembly?<br>Decision: The court decided that it was ok for the school to punish a child for there bad language. <br>Votes: 7-2 for the school</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:19:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154502283</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Engle v. Vitale</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154530007</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:1962<br>Question:Does the reading of a  prayer at the start of the school day violate the First Amendment?<br>Decision: The state can't hold prayers in a public school even if children don't have to participate.<br>Vote: 6-2 Engel</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:23:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154530007</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>FCC v. AT&amp;T</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154547870</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:2011<br>Question:May corporations assert personal privacy interests to prevent the government from releasing documents about them?<br>Decision: No corporations do not have a right of personal privacy that would protect them from the disclosure of public records from the government. <br>Votes: Unanimous for FCC</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:26:28 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154547870</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>NASA v. Nelson</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154572003</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:2011<br>Question: Does the government violate a federal contract employee's constitutional right to privacy by asking her whether she has received counseling or treatment for recent illegal drug use in the past year, or by asking her references if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility?<br>Decision: No background checks give you more information on the people you will hire.<br>Votes: unanimous for NASA</div><div><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:30:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154572003</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>New York Times v. Sullivan</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154599629</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:1964<br>Question: Did Alabama's libel law unconstitutionally infringe on the First Amendment's freedom of speech and freedom of press protections?<br>Decision: The court decided that this case was to go in the favor of the press.<br>Votes: Unanimous for NY Times.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:34:44 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154599629</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Roe v. Wade</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154666633</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1973<br>Question: Does the Constitution recognize a woman's right to terminate her pregnancy by abortion?<br>Decision: A fundamental right to privacy is allowing a woman to do what she wants with her child.<br>votes: 7-2 Rode</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:45:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154666633</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Santa Fe School District vs. Doe</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154672648</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:2000<br>Question: Does the Santa Fe Independent School District's policy permitting student-led, student-initiated prayer at football games violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?<br>Decision: The student led prayer violated the freedom of religion.<br>Votes: 6-3 Doe</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:46:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154672648</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Schenck v. United States</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154687629</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1919<br>Question: Did Schenck's conviction under the Espionage Act for criticizing the draft violate his First Amendment right to freedom of speech?<br>Decision: The espionage act does not violate the first amendment. <br>Votes: unanimous US </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:48:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154687629</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Texas v. Johnson</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154710199</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1989<br>Question: Is the desecration of an American flag, by burning or otherwise, a form of speech that is protected under the First Amendment?<br>Decision: The burning of Johnsons flag was protected under the first amendment.<br>Votes: 5-4 Johnson</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-02 16:52:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1154710199</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tinker v. Des Moines</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1159853956</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date: 1969<br>Question: Does a prohibition against the wearing of armbands in public school, as a form of symbolic protest, violate the students' freedom of speech protections guaranteed by the First Amendment?<br>Decision: Not allowing students to wear these arm bands as protests was violating their rights.<br>Votes: 7-2 Tinker</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-03 17:04:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1159853956</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Washington v. Glucksberg</title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1159881514</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Date:1997 <br>Question: Did Washington's ban on physician assisted-suicide violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause by denying competent terminally ill adults the liberty to choose death over life?<br>Decision: This did not violate the 14th amendment.<br>Votes: unanimous for Washington</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-03 17:09:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1159881514</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities </title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1160141989</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>All of these cases are about thing that occurred at school. In all of the cases that involve religious practices and school we can see that the student against the school won. One thing that changed is in the 1989 case vs the 1969. These were both about the students rights. One was for a students protest out-loud and one was a students protest with armbands. The protest out loud got a red flag for the court were the arm band were permitted. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-03 17:53:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1160141989</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities </title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1160142225</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Two of these courses are about work privacy and one of them is about general privacy. The cases about NASA and FCC were both unanimous decisions about cooperation privacy policies. The difference was the third case. This was about the right to abortion. This case was different since Roe won against Wade. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-03 17:53:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1160142225</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Change/ Continuities </title>
         <author>23mdelp</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1160142546</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>These cases were all very similar in the way that they were a state against a person. The first two cases are also similar because they both involve privacy. The first two cases were also very similar and they had a unanimous vote for the state/US. The third case was different it was a very close call, but Johnson won. In that case Johnson had burned an American flag, but that was under the first amendment freedom of speech.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-02-03 17:53:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/23mdelp/gyamfu3cpponum6c/wish/1160142546</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
