EL 4 Action Agenda 21-22 (Cycle 2) by Dee Rodriguez

EL Department Padlet

drodriguez288 — 2022-01-17 18:23:15 UTC

Share your needs as teacher or team here, share your celebrations, student work and see what other teams are doing.

District Cycle Padlet

drodriguez288 — 2022-01-17 18:25:13 UTC

The PLT Process Power Point

drodriguez288 — 2022-01-17 18:28:52 UTC

(Slides 12-32)

PLT 4 Critical Questions

drodriguez288 — 2022-01-17 18:31:14 UTC

drodriguez288 — 2022-01-17 18:32:37 UTC

PLT Goal (<- cycle document): 80% of our students will earn a 2.5 or higher on each part of FA.Literary Analysis Check-In (CEL-Con body paragraph) as scored by a common writing rubric by 2/11.

segiannopoulos — 2022-01-25 14:04:47 UTC

segiannopoulos — 2022-01-25 14:04:57 UTC

segiannopoulos — 2022-01-25 14:05:07 UTC

EL 4 SMART Goal Literary Analysis Go Formative Questions 1-4

segiannopoulos — 2022-01-25 14:38:30 UTC

Question 1

drodriguez288 — 2022-01-25 14:42:36 UTC

As of 1/21, (click here for teacher data ->)77% of EL Students scored proficient (pass/fail) on Question 1 (correctly identified a sentence that used literary device) in FA. Literary Analysis Check-In (SMART Goal) as scored by a common rubric.

Option 1: CA* Digital Media Literary Analysis

segiannopoulos — 2022-01-25 15:09:32 UTC

Option 1: For students who have mastered essay writing or would like a more creative literary analysis experience.

Option 2: CA* Standard Literary Analysis Essay with guided notes and supports.

segiannopoulos — 2022-01-25 15:11:46 UTC

Option 2: For students who haven't mastered essay writing or for students who would like a more traditional analysis experience.

Question 2

drodriguez288 — 2022-02-04 14:44:23 UTC

As of 1/28, 70% of EL Students scored a 2.5 on Question 1 (correctly identified a sentence that used literary device) in FA. Literary Analysis Check-In (SMART Goal) as scored by a common rubric.

Question 3

drodriguez288 — 2022-02-15 14:57:28 UTC

As of 2/11, 57% of EL Students scored a 2.5on Question 3 (correctly identified a sentence that used literary device) in FA. Literary Analysis Check-In (SMART Goal) as scored by a common rubric.

Literary Analysis Supports

segiannopoulos — 2022-03-01 17:04:19 UTC

* Literary Analysis TEAMS Channel with video notes and screen shots of class notes. (Teachers also shared notes and student examples with one another when needed).
* Student annotation of notes within their own text.
* Use of Go Formative for instant feedback on student writing.
* Peer tutoring for students who have been absent.
* Sentence frames when needed.
* Explicit teaching of how to develop sentence frames using transition words and restatement of guided question notes.
* Guided writing- Body 1- Teacher guides claim, evidence, and explanation, Body 2- Teacher guides claim and evidence, Body 3- Student self directed writing using supports they choose when needed.
* Use of Socratic questioning method with students to further their ideas in the explanation and link when giving students feedback.

Question 3 (redo)

drodriguez288 — 2022-03-03 15:21:19 UTC

As of 2/25, after intervention, 75% of EL students scored 2.5 on Question 3 (correctly identified what the author is trying to compare and explain the connection between the two) in FA. Literary Analysis Check-In (SMART Goal) as scored by a common rubric.

Question 4

drodriguez288 — 2022-03-15 16:48:06 UTC

As of 3/11, 67% of EL students scored 2.5 on Question 4 (correctly explaining author’s purpose and connecting it to the position/claim) in FA. Literary Analysis Check-In (SMART Goal) as scored by a common rubric.

drodriguez288 — 2022-04-04 19:53:59 UTC

PLT Feedback Form