<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>International Organizations  by Ayşehan Tuzci</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-10-22 22:17:35 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2024-01-12 23:08:43 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Week2 </title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2758045006</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>This week, we studied a wide range of issues related to global governance, including networks, international corporations, worldwide organizations, globalizations, problems, and functioning of global government. The agenda is always filled with issues related to growing globalization, terrorism, epidemics, and economic, political, and social issues. Institutions with set regulations have developed to control and handle these issues. Nation states, non-governmental organizations, international organizations, the corporate sector, and people all participate in global governance. They establish shared guidelines and work collaboratively. Global governance encompasses a wide range of areas, including social policy, economics, finance, environment, climate change, security, and human rights and their preservation. Ensuring national peace and prosperity as well as global actors' cooperation is the goal of numerous organizations.&nbsp; The degree to which economic markets, cultures, peoples, and states are interrelated today is a result of advancements in communications and transportation, which speed up the flow of information and ideas as well as capital, people, goods, and news. Globalization has, nevertheless, produced victors and losers both within and within nations. The topic of how to manage globalization arises in light of its positive and negative repercussions. Intergovernmental organizations are an additional notion that humans possess. Organizations classified as intergovernmental are those that operate in multiple states, have membership in at least three states, and were established by a formal intergovernmental agreement, such as a treaty, legislation, or charter. It encompasses a wide range of institutions, including NAFTA, the United Nations, and the International Court of Justice (ICJ). Most IGOs were established following the second World War. The majority of international NGOs are regional or sub-regional, where common interests motivate states to cooperate on issues that directly affect them. As for multinational corporations, they are a specific form of non-state actors organized to conduct profit-oriented business transactions and operations across the borders of three or more states. They operate worldwide and provide employment to millions of people in different parts of the world. Finally, these organizations do not have a single nation-state authority and are generally determined by treaties and agreements of member states. For example, international organizations such as the UN are perceived as legitimate to the extent that they are created and operate according to certain due process principles, such as one state, one vote.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-22 22:22:01 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2758045006</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week3 </title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2758857564</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;<br><br></div><div>Theoretical Foundations of Global Governance</div><div>Theories are primarily intended to facilitate the easier understanding and description of events, circumstances, and viewpoints. A number of fundamental concepts underpin our knowledge of states, interstate players, human nature, and how they interact. The question is whether the goal of international relations theory should be to interpret the language and symbols of social interaction using constructivist or rational theory, or should it be to objectively measure and explain through positivist or rationalist theory. He discusses critical theories and the English school in this chapter. Theories like functionalism are part of liberalism, neoliberal institutionalism, or neoliberalism. Liberal theory contends that social progress is feasible, human activity may improve society, and human nature is essentially good believe social progress is feasible and that institutions can mold and refine human conduct. Liberals think that cooperation can happen and will eventually change. Liberals actually view international institutions as settings where nations communicate and work together to find solutions to shared issues. According to another theory called functionalism, objective, material, and economic decisions are more important than collaboration or disagreement. Neoliberal policies, which include privatization state-owned businesses, are predicated on the premise of lowering trade barriers in order to promote free commerce and lessen industry regulation. They do, however, concentrate on particular topics to provide an explanation, such as the development of a post-World War II network of international economic institutions and clear guidelines for the liberalization of capital flows and trade The idea of the international regime has demonstrated how governments establish these frameworks so that, when needed to further their own national interests, they can coordinate their activities with those of other states. At last, John Mearsheimer claims in "The False Promise of International Organizations" that most international organizations are unable to enforce their own regulations and occasionally even transgress international law, and that states are actors acting in their own interests and do not cooperate unless they believe that doing so will serve their own interests. Taking the Vietnam violence and the Iran-Iraq War as examples, he has made it very evident that while the UN was created to stop violence, it has not been successful in doing so. As numerous theorists have described international organizations, it's critical to keep in mind that nations, which comprise these organizations, operate ultimately in their own best interests.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-23 10:20:41 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2758857564</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week4</title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2767896578</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Interdependence in World Politics</p><p>The old patterns and solutions are no longer effective in the globalized society. A nation's strength must be determined with greater accuracy and attention. Globalization and interconnection are the cause of this. States and societies are interconnected through a complex web of shared interests and interactions that we refer to as interdependence. States' objectives and activities are constrained by this interdependence, which calls for national cooperation. Politics, governance, and government conduct are all impacted by interdependence. It establishes specific guidelines, standards, and government acts to govern and steer these international ties. Numerous factors, such as trade, human migration, and technology breakthroughs, can lead to interdependence. Then, domestic and foreign policy become intertwined in the new language of interdependence. Aspirations and interests can expand globally instead of exculisive to &nbsp;governments. The analytical notion of interdependence aids in our comprehension of the evolving nature of international relations. Interdependence has grown as a result of factors including globalization, new technology, and climate change. Nonetheless, it aids in our comprehension of the possible structures for international politics. States and societies must work together to achieve interdependence. This highlights how crucial international cooperation is. It has the ability to tip the scales of power, particularly on the global stage. We do not restrict the meaning of interdependence to circumstances when both parties gain. For instance, it will become increasingly ambiguous whether or not ties between wealthy and developing nations can be deemed interdependent. The decision to include them will be based on a somewhat subjective assessment of how "mutually beneficial" the ties are. . Another important issue in interdependence is who earns what and the distribution of these gains. As in the example given in the book, oil-exporting governments and multinational oil companies have a common interest in high oil prices; But at the same time, they also have disagreements over the sharing of said profits. That is, these conflicts can create a new world of cooperation and change the shape of old international conflicts. Finally, there is the concept of power and dependence. Power is when a state is economically and militarily competent and has control over and control world affairs. The concept of power is becoming more difficult to define in the modern era due to globalization and state interdependence. Vulnerability and sensitivity must be distinguished in order to comprehend the role that power plays in interdependence. Interdependence and interactions within the framework of policies develop sensitivity, as does our response to events and situations. Consequently, ideas like globalization, power dynamics, and international cooperation play a significant role in the interconnectedness of world politics. These ideas also evolve as governments continue to rely on one another.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-10-29 22:57:15 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2767896578</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week5</title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2811759418</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In his reading of the article "Why Cooperate?" by I. Ernest Haas, he discusses the importance of international organisations and the importance of cooperation. He also explains the increasing involvement of non-state organisations, current global economic events and much more within the framework of international regimes.   Governments no longer conquer countries for resources such as oil and gold or use navies to impose trade agreements on weaker countries. In other words, they are not as willing as they used to be to use force to settle economic disputes, partly because governments understand contemporary reality, emphasise the importance of cooperation and adapt to the needs of the times. Perceptions need to change in order to adapt to a habitable planet.  International regimes are an important issue here. International regimes encourage co-operation by establishing common rules, norms and procedures among states around a particular issue or problem. These policies seek to safeguard shared interests, avert conflicts, and increase confidence in international interactions. It is essential to cooperate across national boundaries and to have a shared vision.   There are certain interdependence issues.  The combined efforts and interests of numerous actors are necessary for harmonised policymaking. However, the involvement of other parties, uncertainty, and conflicting interests can make decision-making procedures difficult and lead to tensions. As the example in the text shows, for instance, British investment in Argentine beef production and electricity services in the 19th century was universally acknowledged as advantageous for both Britain and Argentina; but, the allocation of advantages and cooperation might be disputed and contentious. Conditions of interdependence lead to solidarity in international relations. Solidarity has two dimensions: vulnerability and sensitization. International regime creation is significantly influenced by solidarity. Regarding the establishment of regimes based on information and aims, players evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of regimes using information. This data may include particulars about the situation as it stands right now, historical events, and other actors' actions. They then take into account the goals and employ these tactics, concentrating on industrialization through import substitution as well as economic and technological self-determination, in order to get rid of dependency. To sum up, in order to create just and practical policies in an age-sensitive way, a thorough grasp of stakeholder dynamics, decision-making processes, and international cooperation is needed.</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-12-03 14:16:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2811759418</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week6</title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2811848064</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>(Margaret Karns, Mignst) International Organisations and the Foundations of Global Governance:</p><p>The purpose, efficacy, constraints, and historical evolution of international organizations are all covered in great length in this article. Political societies have made an effort to develop conventions and guidelines for their interactions with one another throughout history. International trade, migration, democratization, technical advancements, and growing interdependence all place restrictions and interdependencies on the boundaries of the state, which causes weaknesses in the national state structure. International organization was established in response to growing challenges and the threat of state fragility. Its goal is to maintain peace and stability across the globe. The formation of intergovernmental organizations and international institutions is a step in the process of international organization. Since the middle of the nineteenth century, this process has been going on, and it has been influenced by a lot of things, including interconnectedness, great power conflicts, economic growth, and rapid technical advancement. The French Revolution and Napoleon's defeat were put an end to in the nineteenth century by the process of international organization. New international organizations and cooperative efforts arose during this time. These included the Council of Europe, the Hague Conference, and open international organizations. In order to safeguard their shared interests and preserve peace and stability throughout Europe, the five great European powers—Britain, France, Prussia, Russia, and Austria-Hungary—cooperated under the terms of the Concert of Europe. This concert brought together key procedures for the institutions that would come after and be established. Together with collective diplomacy, these included privileged status for the "great powers" and multilateral consultation. The Hague conference, another innovation in governance, was a sequence of talks addressing matters of international law and diplomacy. It was the first time that everyone was given an equal say and that minor and non-European states were included in the participation. An international organization replaced the system of European States. Nevertheless, the start of World War I prevented a third convocation of the Hague Conference. With the Second World War, a number of other specialised international organisations were established, including the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), the UN Relief and Rehabilitation Agency (UNRRA), the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). IGO2s were established in various parts of the world. The United Nations system was then established as a general organisation that could help the war-weary nations of the second world war to promote international economic and social cooperation. The UN Charter was also based on lessons learnt from public international associations, conference diplomacy and the Hague Conference dispute settlement mechanisms. The principal organs of the UN are: The Security Council, the General Assembly, the Secretariat and the International Court of Justice. As these functional and specialised organisations expanded, over time, new problems emerged and other bodies were created to address even more specialised problems in response to unmet needs. As a result, from the middle of the nineteenth century, the number of functional and specialized IGOs has increased dramatically. These organizations deal with a wide range of topics, including labor, economics, health, communications, agriculture, and food. States and basic international law made up the first institutions of modern global governance. But as time went on, these organizations grew more intricate and integrated into a global network of organizations.</p><p>·&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-12-03 16:46:18 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2811848064</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week9</title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2833337287</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Humanitarian intervention</p><p>Institutionalized slavery and human trafficking were eradicated by human rights advocates in the late 19th century. It is estimated that approximately 12 million people worldwide may be victims of human trafficking. Data based on human trafficking incidents recorded by 113 major agencies between 1996 and 2003 show that three-quarters of the majority of women were sexually exploited. Work has begun on a separate protocol regarding human trafficking. The Universal Declaration of human rights included the right to freedom from slavery or servitude. However, UNODC works under the convention to combat trafficking, assist states in preparing policies and providing educational resources. Work has begun on a separate protocol regarding human trafficking. The drafting process of the protocol, which lasted from late 1998 to 2000, was long and advocacy was undertaken by NGOs. Slavery, sex work, immigrants, starving children and much more are all violations of human rights, and as technology, media and publishing organs develop, the pressure on states and organizations such as the United Nations and the demand that something needs to be done increases. It outlines these rights beginning with the English Magna Carta in 1215, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1789, and the United States Bill of Rights in 1791. No one "should be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law," for instance. Political and civic liberties, as well as freedom of the press and religion, should all be safeguarded. The 1993 World Conference on Human Rights resulted in the Vienna Declaration and Program of Action, which states: "He declared that all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent, and interrelated." The 19th-century humanist movement was characterized by unbiased, apolitical behavior that was centered solely on securing people's rights, easing their suffering, and taking necessary action to achieve these goals. When it comes to international human rights institutions and mechanisms, NGOs play an important role. The 1970s saw an increase in the number of human rights NGOs due to global events and the Helsinki Accords. International norms and the globalization of human rights have been greatly influenced by NGOs. Despite lacking a formal human rights framework, the League of Nations' numerous programs and projects have made a substantial global contribution to the advancement and defense of human rights. Nonetheless, the UN Charter, which established human rights as the organization's primary goal, has made this determination. Despite continuing difficulties, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, with its many initiatives and institutions, provides a significant worldwide framework for the protection and advancement of fundamental rights, even though it only establishes general guidelines. Established in 1993, the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHCR) is a prominent global champion for human rights. We cannot ignore the impact of communication technologies Since the launch of the UNHCR website in 1996, NGOs and intergovernmental organizations have used communication technologies to access official documents and government reports. Our other title is Variation in NGO-Treaty Body Relations. The relationship between NGOs and UN treaty bodies varies.&nbsp; The Function of National and Local Human Rights Organizations: National human rights organizations, without reference to their national delegations, are entitled to take part in the activities of the Human Rights Council. The 1990s saw the historical concealment of violence against women come to light as a human rights concern. By addressing gender-based violence, the 1993 Vienna World Conference on Human Rights established a connection between women's rights and human rights. The Vienna Declaration's Article 18 was largely influenced by the Global Campaign for Women's Human Rights. 1993 saw the adoption of the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women by the UN General Assembly. Throughout the years, states have funded rape crisis centers, established domestic violence shelters, passed specific legislation, targeted vulnerable populations, trained experts, and funded public education and prevention initiatives. These are admirable actions done to promote awareness and defend women's rights. Ultimately, in certain situations, the UN and non-governmental organizations are unable or unwilling to fully interfere in events when they lack the capacity to do so or when doing so would contradict with the interests of other governments. This does not imply that these groups have found solutions to every issue, only that they have made positive starts, taken meaningful action, and brought about a structured order in the world.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-12-24 22:21:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2833337287</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week 7</title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2847394236</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>This week we read The article “The Politics and Ethics of Military Intervention” by Stanley Hoffman.The article deals with the controversial issue of military intervention in state affairs. The conflict between the two core ideas of human rights and sovereignty is at the center of the issue. On the one hand, there are strong advocates for the long-standing respect for a state's autonomy over its internal affairs, free from outside interference. Realism places a higher priority on national interests than humanitarian concerns and warns against the disruptive implications of intervention. Marxists object to the threat posed by neo-colonialism, claiming that interventions will cover up powerful nations' self-serving exploitation.</p><p>Conversely, the agonized cries create a powerful counterpoint. Liberals contend that in extreme cases, protecting innocent lives goes beyond the preservation of national sovereignty. Hoffmann maintained that the authority to approve military involvement should have come from the UN Security Council. But he also conceded that political considerations frequently undermine the Security Council's efficacy. His belief is that in order to enhance the ability to act, reforms are necessary. Hoffmann proposes three standards to evaluate whether military action is warranted: threats to global peace and security, grave breaches of human rights, and unstable states. On the other hand, these interventions have key questions such as when they are legitimate, by whom, what are their aims and methods. Threats to global peace and security: Intervention is necessary when domestic crises have external effects. severe human rights violations, Genocide, ethnic cleansing, and ruthless repression need to be addressed. Problems are  subjectivity, It's still difficult to define what constitutes "massive violations" and "threats". Time, although early warning indicators are generally ignored or resisted governments, prevention is vital. For reasons of legitimacy and efficacy, UN or regional organizations should have the authority to act. When we look at the goals and in what situations the intervention will be made,humanitarian assistance as well as victim protection. Peace-enforcement, End violence and provide temporary security.</p><p><br></p><p><br></p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-01-12 22:37:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2847394236</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week8</title>
         <author>tuzciaysehan</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2847410597</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>We read Chain Braun and Christopher F. Chyba's "Proliferation Rings: New Challenges to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime" this week. </p><p>Latent proliferation, first-tier proliferation, and second-tier proliferation are the three main issues that the nuclear nonproliferation system faces. Using recent data from nations like Iran, Libya, Pakistan, South Africa, and Turkey, it investigates the spread of second-class nuclear technology in armament systems. The paper also suggests measures to deal with proliferation's supply and demand sides. Another examines ,the article's history and prospective capabilities about North Korea's nuclear program are examined in another part.It is important to comprehend the reasons driving proliferation. While worries about national security frequently play a major role, other motivations, like as prestige and regional instability, can also play a part in a state's decision to pursue nuclear weapons. It is imperative to tackle demand-side factors in addition to supply-side measures such as enhanced export controls and nuclear material security. Proliferation rings are getting more and more sophisticated, thus a diversified strategy is required. Nonproliferation regimes that are in place are important, but in order to effectively confront this developing threat, we may need to reevaluate and possibly rebuild these mechanisms. Furthermore, the essay also explores methods to fortify the nuclear nonproliferation regime,emphasizing how emerging nations may be able to get nuclear weapons through mutual trade, lessening their dependency on outside sources. By ensuring compliance by non-nuclear-weapon states, the IAEA supplementary protocol fortifies the non-proliferation framework. Aims are also being made to strengthen export control laws, stop proliferation networks, and stop nuclear weapons from spreading. Several phases were advantageous for proliferation rings. One way to reduce these channels is by the widespread implementation of the Additional Protocol. Finally, second-tier proliferation rings represent an increasing threat that necessitates an all-encompassing response that includes both conventional nonproliferation measures and maybe novel strategies to deal with the changing nature of nuclear ambitions.</p><p><br></p>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2024-01-12 23:05:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/tuzciaysehan/gqsblec529g695gc/wish/2847410597</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
