Globalisation by

abel61 — 2021-02-09 09:13:37 UTC

Dear students, I want to discuss the topic of 'globalisation' with you. For that, please blog a profound entry on this padlet page. Here is your question: Has globalization gone too far, not far enough, or has it been heading in the wrong direction? Please feel free to comment on your students answers too. I do not accept impolite or unserious answers. Have fun! I am looking forward hearing from you soon. - Katharina Abel -

messicamaraassa — 2021-02-09 10:41:18 UTC

Since the Corona Pandemic, globalization has been going on the wrong side because many countries have been taking care of their own people and in the past, all countries have kept together and wanted to move on together.

abel61 — 2021-02-09 10:44:36 UTC

Hey Assane! Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. Could you explain your answer more detailed ? I can understand your statement, but maybe you could provide an example? Thanks :)

2021-02-09 18:39:28 UTC

The Corona pandemic is a caesura in many ways. She dramatically showed the vulnerabilities and weaknesses of our societies and economies. The global exchange of goods also proved to be susceptible to crisis. This raises the question of how globalization will change under the lasting impression of Covid-19. In normal times, free markets organize complex production steps, distribute them highly efficiently among the corresponding actors in different countries, taking advantage of specialization advantages through the international division of labor and thus creating an optimal supply of goods at low prices - just in time. But the Corona pandemic interrupted many supply chains through border controls, export bans, and lockdowns, the failure of some suppliers paralyzed entire value chains. Many industries were affected: from car manufacturers to network equipment manufacturers.
Annalena

messicamaraassa — 2021-02-10 02:57:18 UTC

I believe that the countries before the Corona Pandemic worked together, not because they all go their own way.

abel61 — 2021-02-10 08:08:05 UTC

@Annalena: Thank you for your nice blogging entry! Could you also state your personal opinion on that? Thank You! K.Abel

abel61 — 2021-02-10 08:11:38 UTC

@Assane: Thank you for the video! It also highlights contentwise Annalenas entry. They are talking about the economy. What consequences do you think the pandemic will have on your personal future? K.Abel

2021-02-10 18:59:54 UTC

I think globalization has developed too far. Because more and more companies are moving to poorer countries to have cheaper production costs and want cheaper labor. If this continues, we will no longer have companies and jobs in Germany and all will be unemployed, because then simply all companies will be in low-wage countries.
Annalena

2021-02-11 09:58:23 UTC

We have many weak points in our society, which are made clear by current situation (Covid-19). Usually the markets organize themselves completely by themselves, there are normal free trade routs that everyone uses. The international division of labor creates an optimal supply of goods at low prices. But the trade route around England is disrupted, because they left the EU at the beginning of the year (Brexit). Although we have all become very modern and advanced in science, we still show our weaknesses in the current situation that exists in our society. The supply chains are partly interrupted the to border controls or closures. Some companies are affected by this and cannot deliver their goods to the customer immediately and could lose sales as aresult. This begs the question of what is still to come?

2021-02-11 09:58:34 UTC

Ps: Angelina

2021-02-11 10:08:02 UTC

My opinion is that globalization is developing too fast in contrast to our current society, since most companies settle where it is nice and cheap, while you increase unemployment with us, because without companies, no jobs. I also think we have become modern in terms of technology an everything related to it, but in some points it is too fast, for example, in terms of producution , which is why we as a society cannot keep up. Angelina

abel61 — 2021-02-11 10:09:57 UTC

Hey Angelina, very interesting points! Thank you for your contribution. Katharina Abel

2021-02-11 13:18:28 UTC

Globalisation has not gone far enough. For the benefits of trade liberalization were not simply the efficiency gains from removing a set of tariff distortions in the economy. Simulations with computable general equilibrium (CGE) models showed that, if this were the only effect, the benefits from trade reform would be minuscule. Trade restrictions did more than add a distortion to a cometitive economy. In many cases, they created domestic monopolies that could exercrise their monoply power behind trade protection. Some of these monopolists were also political connected, which may explain the resistance to trade liberalization in manycountries. When the presence of these monopolies s incorporated into a CGE model, the beneficial effects of trade liberalization become much greater. The reason is that trade liberalization subjects these monopolsts to foreign competition, breaking down their monopoly power, lowering domstic prices much more (therebymaking it cheaper for those who buy these goods), end permitting the exlooitation of scale. von: Merve

2021-02-12 02:51:30 UTC

I think Globalisation is a development for the whole World,
we need it to develop us.
Globalisation change the World every time.
The more time passes, the more changes take places, without Globalisation we would live in Difficulties that accumulate more and more.

Von : Nuran Sorguc

2021-02-12 12:02:29 UTC

I think globalization has gone too far. It should be slowed down so that the forces of globalization are better under control and human rights but also cultural diversity are better protected. in my opinion the risks of globalization are not discussed enough such as child work or poorly paid jobs. Even the “winners” of globalization have a lot to lose if an equal distribution of income leads to social instability.

Zipel

2021-02-12 12:53:40 UTC

I think globalisation has been heading in the wrong direction because globalisation was introduced with a vision of trading of the goods of one country with another without trade barriers. With the outbreak of COVID-19, it has become obvious just how volatile this massive level of connectivity and interdependence really is. The pandemic has placed an unprecedented burden on the world economy, healthcare, and globalization through travel, events cancellation, employment workforce, food chain, academia, and healthcare capacity.

Tim 11Bs3

2021-02-12 12:53:41 UTC

In my opinion Globalization is exposing social fissures between those with the education, skills, and mobility to flourish in an unfettered world market the apparent winners and those without. These apparent losers are increasingly anxious about their standards of living and their precarious place in an integrated world economy. The result is severe tension between the market and broad sectors of society, with governments caught in the middle. Compounding the very real problems that need to be addressed.
At the End I want to say that globalisation is going to fast and that we should do something about it.

Hamza K. , 11bs3

2021-02-12 19:01:41 UTC

I think Globalisation has it been heading in the wrong direction because Globalisation tended to destroy the web of social realtionships that held human society together. The market for labor pressured people to move around the globe to where they could earn the most at the potentially substantial sociological price of creating strangers in strange lands. The market for consumer goods rewarded people for being lucky or for responding to the incentives provided by factor markets and in so doing made human status rankings the product of responsiveness to market forces rather than the result of social norms and views about distributive justice. Ahmad A. 11bs3

2021-02-12 21:09:28 UTC

Globalization is the spread of information, products, technology and jobs across national borders and cultures. It describes an interdependence of nations. I think globalization shows social rifts amid those with education, skills, and associated goodness in order to thrive in an unlinked world market the obvious winners and individuals without doing so.
These obvious losers are more and more annoying approximately their requirements of dwelling and their precarious location in an included international economy. The consequence is excessive anxiety among the marketplace ang huge sectors of society, with governments stuck inside the middle.
In spite of all I need to mention that globalization goes to rapid which we have a tendency to ought to do one thing positive about it.

Moufide I. 11bs3

2021-02-12 21:39:14 UTC

Globalization has altered the manner we stay and earn a livelihood. Consequently, change and tour were identified as giant determinants of the unfold of disorder. Additionally, the upward thrust in urbanization and the nearer integration of the arena financial system have facilitated worldwide interconnectedness. Therefore, globalization has emerged as an vital mechanism of disorder transmission. This paper targets to observe the capability effect of COVID-19 on globalization and worldwide fitness in phrases of mobility, change, tour, and international locations maximum impacted. The impact of globalization had been operationalized in phrases of mobility, financial system, and healthcare structures. The mobility of people and its significance became assessed the usage of airline and seaport change statistics and tour information. The financial effect became measured primarily based totally at the workforce, occasion cancellations, meals and agriculture, educational institutions, and deliver chain. The healthcare ability became assessed with the aid of using thinking about healthcare machine signs and preparedness of international locations. Utilizing a way for order of desire with the aid of using similarity to perfect solution (TOPSIS), we calculated a plague vulnerability index (PVI) with the aid of using developing a quantitative degree of the capability worldwide fitness. The pandemic has positioned an unparalleled burden on the arena financial system, healthcare, and globalization thru tour, occasions cancellation, employment workforce, meals chain, academia, and healthcare ability. Based on PVI results, positive international locations had been extra prone than others. In Africa, extra prone international locations blanketed South Africa and Egypt; in Europe, they had been Russia, Germany, and Italy; in Asia and Oceania, they had been India, Iran, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey; and for the Americas, they had been Brazil, USA, Chile, Mexico, and Peru. The effect on mobility, financial system, and healthcare structures has handiest began out to manifest. The findings of this look at might also additionally assist withinside the making plans and implementation of techniques on the us of a stage to assist ease this rising burden.

GDP boom quotes were approximately 2 percent factors better after alternate liberalization. Investment-to-GDP quotes were nearly 10 percent factors better—and sustained for a long term after liberalization. Moreover, this better boom has contributed to quicker poverty reduction in globalizing international locations. And there may be no systematic dating among alternate liberalization and inequality. In a few globalizing international locations inequality rose, whilst in others it fell.

Why then does globalization elicit a lot complaint from NGOs and academics, amongst others? One motive is that the common boom quotes disguise a massive variant amongst man or woman international locations. Among most important Latin American international locations, for instance, the best usa that noticed a sizeable boom in its boom price post-liberalization changed into Chile; Brazil and Mexico skilled a decline of their boom quotes. Similarly, in Africa, except Ghana, alternate liberalization changed into observed via way of means of a decline in common boom quotes in lots of international locations. It is best in Asia that maximum international locations have visible an boom in boom quotes after liberalization. This consists of now no longer simply the prestigious instances of India and China, however smaller international locations together with Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, and the Philippines.

Furthermore, in a number of the international locations in which the boom effect changed into weak, the employment consequences had been even extra troubling. In Brazil, the areas dealing with tariff cuts skilled sizeable drops in formal-zone employment and earnings. These consequences have become extra stated two decades after liberalization.

Finally, for alternate liberalization to have its meant effect, a number of different elements should be in place. Africa nevertheless has a massive infrastructure deficit, because of this that that although there may be alternate reform, it stays hard to deliver synthetic items to ports. India has visible little or no boom in production employment—although it has a massive range of low-professional workers. The stage of training of those human beings is woefully poor: The percentage of second-graders in rural public faculties who couldn't examine a unmarried phrase changed into eighty percentage.

Do those criticisms suggest that globalization has long past too a ways? On the contrary, they endorse that it has now no longer long past a ways enough. For the advantages of alternate liberalization had been now no longer in reality the performance profits from getting rid of a fixed of tariff distortions withinside the economic system. Simulations with computable trendy equilibrium (CGE) fashions confirmed that, if this had been the best effect, the advantages from alternate reform could be minuscule. Trade regulations did extra than upload a distortion to a aggressive economic system. In many instances, they created home monopolies that might exercising their monopoly energy in the back of alternate safety. Some of those monopolists had been additionally politically connected, which can also additionally provide an explanation for the resistance to alternate liberalization in lots of international locations. When the presence of those monopolies is integrated right into a CGE model, the useful consequences of alternate liberalization turn out to be a whole lot extra. The motive is that alternate liberalization topics those monopolists to overseas opposition, breaking down their monopoly energy, reducing home fees a whole lot extra (thereby making it less expensive for folks that purchase those items), and allowing the exploitation of economies of scale.

But alternate liberalization best affected monopoly energy withinside the tradable zone—production and agriculture. It did not anything to interrupt down the monopolies withinside the nontradable zone—offerings together with finance, delivery, and distribution. To this day, the offerings zone stays largely unreformed. Yet, finance, delivery, distribution, and commercial enterprise offerings are necessary inputs into the manufacturing of exports, accounting for approximately 30-forty percentage of value-introduced in exports. If those nontradable offerings continue to be monopolized, then it's far hard for the tradable zone to enlarge withinside the wake of alternate liberalization.

That this isn't always only a theoretical possibility, I will illustrate with 3 particular examples.

Cronyism in Tunisia. Tunisia undertook most important alternate reforms withinside the Nineteen Nineties however export boom remained anemic. This is unexpected given Tunisia’s proximity to Europe, pretty top infrastructure, and an knowledgeable population. During this equal period, the own circle of relatives of the then President, Ben Ali, had pastimes in positive establishments. The sectors in which those establishments had been located acquired safety from each home and overseas opposition. And those sectors had been telecoms, delivery, and banking. So the fees of those offerings had been artificially excessive (Tunisia had the third-maximum telecoms fees withinside the global). Since you want those offerings to export, Tunisian exports had been now no longer aggressive in global markets. The monopoly energy loved via way of means of those companies may be visible withinside the distribution of profits: The “Ben Ali companies” relative to the relaxation of the economic system accounted for 0.eight percentage of employment, three percentage of output—and 21 percentage of profits.
Roads in Africa. As already mentioned, Africa’s infrastructure deficit stands withinside the manner of harnessing the profits from alternate liberalization. But a study of the most important avenue delivery corridors in Africa found out that car running fees alongside those 4 corridors had been no better than in France. What changed into better in Africa had been delivery fees—the best withinside the global, in reality. The distinction among delivery fees and car running fees is the income margin accruing to the trucking companies. These margins had been of the order of a hundred percentage. How can this be? Because there are policies withinside the books in nearly each African usa that restrict access into the trucking industry. These policies had been brought a half-century in the past whilst trucking changed into idea to be a herbal monopoly. Today, there may be no want for such regulation, however there are massive trucking monopolies in each usa that foyer in opposition to deregulation. The reality that household of the ruling own circle of relatives personal the trucking organisation doesn’t help. Africa’s excessive delivery fees are because of monopoly energy withinside the (nontradable) delivery zone, that is in flip status withinside the manner of the continent’s profiting from alternate liberalization.
Teachers in India. How is it that second-graders in rural public faculties in India can’t examine? For approximately 1 / 4 of the time, the instructor is absent. How can instructors remain absent 12 months in and 12 months out? In India, instructors run the campaigns of the nearby politicians. If the flesh presser receives elected, he turns round and offers the instructor a activity for which he doesn’t want to expose up. The end result is that instructors, being companies of nontradable offerings, have a small diploma of monopoly energy that allows them to be absent with out most important sanctions.
In sum, the motive alternate liberalization has now no longer completely introduced at the promise is that best tradable sectors were concern to worldwide opposition. If this opposition may be unfold to the nontradable sectors, we can see extra opposition in the ones sectors and larger profits from alternate liberalization. The trouble with globalization isn't always that it has long past too a ways; it’s that it hasn’t long past a ways enough.

Serhat Torun 11bs3

2021-02-12 21:57:12 UTC

moufide I think you have explained the topic Perfect

Serhat Torun 11bs3

2021-02-12 21:57:45 UTC

Serhat you write a lot, as always, but I've read everything I think it's very good.

Moufide I., 11bs3

2021-02-12 21:58:04 UTC

thanks

2021-02-12 21:59:33 UTC

With pleasure. Thank you serhat

2021-02-12 22:38:51 UTC

great formal text with important facts serhat!:)
-zehra

2021-02-12 22:40:41 UTC

In my opinion globalization has not gone too far.

Globalization describes the economic and political relationships between states.

Because of it we can easily get goods from other countries that we do not have here in Germany.

Most of the things are tradet from foreign countries.

For example lot of foods come from warmer countries like Spain and Italy.

Another example would be that we get most of the clothes from treshold countries like India or Indonesian.
So all in all, I do not think that globalization has gone too far because it brought us more benefits than disadvantages

Zehra 11bs3

2021-02-13 07:35:19 UTC

I am of the opinion that globalization has gone too far that one uses the workers in other countries because they are cheaper so the workers in their countries do not get a job and you pollute the environment because you simply get resources in other countries they use too much of the resources and that is one of the reasons why the environment cannot recover

Dündar Alp 11bs3

2021-02-13 11:32:53 UTC

zehra you wrote good things on the topic

Serhat

2021-02-13 14:29:53 UTC

Has Globalisation gone too far?
In my opinion I don't think that is the case,as globalisation is something that has made our lives very easier.With only a click of a button away we are able to purchase almost anything off the Internet from anywhere in the world.If we didn't have that we would have to go looking for the supplies we want on ourselves.Also the impact that globalisation has on the less wealthier and third world countries is very important because these countries are mostly filled with povetry and some items of need would not be able to be produced in these countries.That's why with Globalisation these countries are able to get the items from the more wealthy countries through transportation.

Dimitris 11 bs3

2021-02-13 15:59:34 UTC

I think it is difficult to talk about the topic Globalization like is Globalization gone too far or not far enough or is Globalization developing in the wrong direction, because Globalization is the definition of connections between economy, politics, culture, environment and communication that exists in this world. Through these many connections we have a lot of advantages but also of disadvantages. The first advantage that the Globalization brings with it is, on the one hand the international world trade and global cooperation with other countries. Because of the global cooperation we can get materials from our „partners“ that are not available in our country. Another advantage would be that more jobs are created, thus the unemployment rate can fall, but there is also a disadvantage associated with this advantage, namely that it cannot be guaranteed that no employee will be exploited by his respective employer. This exploitation of employee particularly happens in low-wage countries. So another advantage that there is thanks to globalization would be that different cultures grow together and thus there is more diversity in his country, but unfortunately the disadvantage would be that this diversity becomes less because, for example, natives of immigrants demand to adapt to their country's culture. In addition, there is another advantage, because the world economy is constantly growing due to globalization, but the following problem is that this constantly growing world economy can lead to competition between corporations. That's why I can't say whether globalization is going too far, is developing in the wrong direction or has not developed enough, so I don't have a firm opinion about it. All I can say is that globalization is a great benefit for us humans, but it cannot be ruled out that other areas of globalization can benefit from the benefits we create, such as the environment, because globalization has helped that we are confronted and aggravated by today's environmental damage. Globalization is not perfect. Denise 11bs3

2021-02-13 16:31:00 UTC

in my opinion, globalization is going in the right direction because globalization improves the chances of fighting the pandemic. It only took science a few weeks to recognize the virus and understand how it worked. Politicians around the world could be warned and measures taken to combat the spread of the disease. Another great advantage of globalization is that pandemics today claim fewer victims because scientists work together internationally. The results of the research are exchanged and current figures and information are published on the Internet within a few hours.
In addition, due to globalization, it is very easy and inexpensive to transport things and it makes things much easier.
Despite the many advantages, I also think that globalization is not always good. Globalization is not going too fast, but considering that the virus has never spread so quickly because of globalization, it already makes me think whether this is not going in the wrong direction but on the whole I am glad that globalization is making such progress makes.
Finnja 11bs3

2021-02-13 17:22:07 UTC

In my opinion, globalization has not gone too far. Globalization describes the economic and political relationships between states. Worldwide trade increases the material prosperity of people. Consumers can now choose their desired product on the global market - often at a lower price - and are not limited to what is available in their own country or limited to their continent. Developing countries are also gaining importance as trading partners and possible sales markets for the industrialized countries. You are increasingly taking part in world market events. I think it also has disadvantages, of course, for example job losses in industrialized countries, but I think it has more advantages than disadvantages.

Ahmad.O

2021-02-13 18:17:57 UTC

I personally think that globalization didn’t went to far or at least is going into the right direction because now we can communicate with people all around world and makes more goods and services available to more people, often at lower prices. If you have disposable income and you’re buying a product that comes from abroad, you’re benefiting from globalization to some extent. Business owners also benefit by having access to a bigger market for their goods and services and also thank to globalization we can now find out more about different countries and their art and cultures but art and culture aren’t the only things that spread more easily in a globalized society. The same goes for information and technology. As examples, see the rise of mobile banking in Kenya or the practice of microlending. Civil society groups can look to other countries for inspiration and good ideas can spread more easily. Globalization also includes the governments for example in 2010 Barack Obama inserted Obama-care to help people in the whole America.

Amelia K. 11bs3

2021-02-13 18:56:03 UTC

in my opinion, globalisation has passed too quickly. it’s up to the industry and the people themselves. climate change is to blame, animals are dying out and the ice in the Arctic is melting. Here are a few pro and contra arguments on the topic of globalization.
Advantage 1: Globalization expands access to goods and services. It is hard to argue that globalization will provide more goods and services to more people at lower prices. If you have disposable income and you want to buy products from abroad, you can benefit from globalization to some extent. Business owners can also benefit by entering a larger market for goods and services.
Advantage 2: Globalization can lift people out of poverty.
The argument that globalization has lifted people out of poverty in developing countries is somewhat controversial because of differences in views on the quantity and quality of jobs created by globalization. But the prevailing view is that globalization has increased employment opportunities in countries that lack capital and are rich in labor (ie, developing countries).
Disadvantage 1: Workers in developed countries may lose out to workers in countries with cheap labor.

The first argument against globalization is the one that most frequently appears in American political discussions about NAFTA and other trade agreements. When the United States competes with underdeveloped countries, its biggest advantage is the opportunity to obtain capital, and the biggest advantage of underdeveloped countries is cheap labor.
Generally speaking, globalization has increased the rate of return on capital in rich countries like the United States and reduced the rate of return on labor in these countries. This is an illusion that globalization will lead to the disappearance of low-skilled jobs in the United States (although technology also plays an important role in this change). The result may be reduced inequality between countries, but increased inequality within countries.
Disadvantage 2: Globalization has failed to achieve the expected achievements in labor rights, human rights and environmental protection.

In theory, globalization is an opportunity to spread values and practices such as environmentalism and labor rights worldwide. In fact, this spread is slow and imperfect. For example, a company might follow lower standards instead of exporting the labor protection measures it complies with in the United States, such as in Bangladesh.

Some people believe that globalization has led to a "bottom line race." In this competition, companies are actively looking for countries with the weakest labor and environmental protection and the lowest wages. Although globalization has increased the flow of goods, services and capital, there are still a large number of tax havens, which means that many of the added values brought by globalization have not been captured and redistributed by the government.

Edina, 11bs3

2021-02-14 10:41:27 UTC

Globalisation has had far-reaching effects on our lifestyle. It has led to faster access to technology, improved Communication and innovation. Apart from playing an important role in bringing people of different cultures together, it has ushered a new era in the economic prosperity and has opened up vast channels of development.

Susan

2021-02-14 14:20:07 UTC

Globalization has gone too far because after the outbreak of Corona, it became clear how unstable the level of connectivity and interdependence is. Each country cares only for itself. But without globalization, we would have a closed system and would not know what is going on in the other countries. And no new discoveries and inventions would be shared. Personally, I can't comment so well on this because there are both positive and negative aspects, but without globalization in the world it is not possible.

Vanessa, 11bs4

2021-02-14 14:41:48 UTC

I think that globalization has gone too far. It should be slowed down so that the forces of globalization are better under control and human rights but also cultural diversity are better protected. In my opinion the risks of globalization are not discussed enough such as child work or poorly paid jobs. Even the people who profit from globalization take big risks and have a lot to lose if an equal distribution of income leads to social instability.

Nurcan 11bs4

2021-02-14 16:13:44 UTC

Many of you try to restrict globalization to the corona pandemic just because it is an ongoing crisis right now that affects each one of us visually. But I would recommend to look at the bigger picture. Without globalization being that far most people in the western countries would not live the lifes they are living. Stating the obvious you wouldn‘t even know what’s happening in the world right now. Countries slept on the corona virus and did not take this topic as serious as they should’ve. But can you blame them? No one knew that we would be in such a pandemic. But let’s imagine countries would not be in such a communication like they are. It would be much worse than now. Probably some of you will say without globalization the virus would not spread like it did. Thinn twice. Even if just one person would travel in an other country the virus would be in that country too. The globalization maybe speeded it up, but also allows country to act better as they can exchange studies and vaccines woth eachother. Oh and also, probably most of you are shopping online, that would not be an option without globalization. Playing onlines games either. Or calling your best friends every night.
In general you can say that globalization has its disadvantages that we have to figure out. It is a constantly changing process. But I think that the benefits should not be reduced to the disadvantages

rabia kurt , 11bs4 ;)

2021-02-14 18:06:04 UTC

I think Globalisation has gone too far. Through certain reasons, globalisation has developed rapidly. There are 5 factors that have influenced it. In my opinion, the most important of the 5 are the global problems, such as the climate. The other 2 cause of globalisation are the transport costs and the end of the cold war. The last 2 causes are liberalisatisation ans technologie (the internet). In my opinion, it has spread faster because of these causes. Ilayda C. 11bs4

2021-02-14 18:13:24 UTC

I Think that globalizatio is developing too fast to our current society, since most companies settle where it is nice and cheap. Globalization change the world every time . The more time passes , the more changes take places, without Globalisation we would live in Difficulties that accumulate more and more.

Salih Abi

2021-02-14 18:15:36 UTC

i think globalization has two sides. On the one side there are the advantages vor us For example that we can fly anywhere in the world at any time during vacation or that we can order something from the Other side of the world, on dis Point of view globalisation cant get far enaught. but on the other side is our planet that is being destroyed by globalization. For our planet, globalization is already far too advanced and we have to find a way to protect it while we can

Richard Linger 11.bs.04

2021-02-14 18:40:03 UTC

The coronavirus is a thing that tests globalization. How globalization deals with the corona virus and more. The spread of the coronavirus is an exponential growth that many do not understand. It's also hard to solve. Because of the fast reaction from China, they managed to shape something and get things under control. In order to prevent the pandemic, all countries must now follow suit. The measures that are in place will severely limit globalization, as we are used to.

Arlindoo 11bs4

2021-02-14 18:53:57 UTC

Globalization is a process where exchanges of human beings, goods, and services, capital, technologies or cultural practices all over the planet happen. One of the effects of globalization is that it promotes and increases interactions between different regions and populations around the globe.

Geslain 11Bs4

2021-02-14 20:14:20 UTC

I think that's not possible to rate the other extra badly so that they are better presented and you shouldn't do that but well as you want