<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Court Cases by MSchiele 61062</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:03:11 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-11-03 14:01:17 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Question</title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202146866</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:13:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202146866</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Parties</title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202147590</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Vernonia School District as the &nbsp;</div><div>Petitioner&nbsp;<br>Acton as the Respondent</div><div>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:14:56 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202147590</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>parties</title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202148357</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; &nbsp;petitioner -Fremont Weeks &nbsp;<br>respondent- United States</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:16:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202148357</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Who were the parties in the case?</title>
         <author>tdieckman01275</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202148493</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;New Jersey high school&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:16:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202148493</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Parties</title>
         <author>krick19595</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202148630</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Savana Redding&nbsp;vs the school district</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:16:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202148630</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What key events brought this case to court?</title>
         <author>krick19595</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202150375</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Savana Redding was stripped searched by school officials which violated her fourth amendment right. Redding then proceeded to file suit against the school district along with the school officials.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:19:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202150375</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Key events occurred that brought this case to court</title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202150908</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the hard evidence on the actual usage was on the thin side, whereas there was plenty of evidence that people were going around bragging about drug use, glorifying drug use, giving the impression that it was a smart thing to do, and kids at that age claim to have done a lot of things that they haven't done.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-10-31 14:20:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202150908</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What key events occurred that brought this case to court?</title>
         <author>tdieckman01275</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202490427</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>In a New Jersey high school, a teacher found two girls smoking in the bathroom and took them to the principal's office. One girl admitted to smoking but the other, known as T.L.O., denied it. The principal demanded to see the girl's purse and found evidence that she was also selling marijuana at school. T.L.O. was taken to the police station where she admitted to selling marijuana</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:40:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202490427</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Backstory</title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202490780</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Acton was an athletic drug user who refused a urinalysis and was denied participation in his school's football program, so he took this case to court claiming that doing urinalysis violated the Fourth Amendment.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:41:05 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202490780</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What was the legal issue? What was the question the court had to decide?</title>
         <author>krick19595</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202492345</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Savana Redding was illegally strip searched and her fourth amendment right was violated by the school district. The court had to decide weather or not her rights were truly vilated.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:43:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202492345</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>key events</title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202492527</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>police entered the home of weeks without a search warrant and seized papers that convicted  weeks of transporting lottery tickets through the mail.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:44:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202492527</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What was the legal issue? What question was the court asked to decide?</title>
         <author>tdieckman01275</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202494004</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;The court sided with the school, and T.L.O. took her case to the New Jersey Supreme Court, which later found that the search was unreasonable and the evidence could not be used. The state of New Jersey appealed the decision to the United States Supreme Court.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:47:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202494004</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the court decide the case?</title>
         <author>krick19595</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202494374</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The court granted motion for summary judgement and later after rehearing the case the court of appeals decided that Reddings rights were in fact violated.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:47:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202494374</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>legal issue, question court had to decide on</title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202494574</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;The question that&nbsp; the court had&nbsp; to decide on was&nbsp; ''Did the search and seizure of Weeks' home violate the Fourth Amendment?'' the question was asked because the police violated weeks privacy by basically breaking into his house. the police didn't have a search warrant to search into his house causing weeks to claim that his privacy rights were violated.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:48:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202494574</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why did the court reach that decision?</title>
         <author>krick19595</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202496296</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The court knew that Reddings rights were violated, because there was no clear evidence that she was in possession of ibuprofen on the school grounds making the search a violation. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:50:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202496296</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Court decision </title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202497145</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It was a 6-3 vote hat it was not a violation to the Fourth Amendment.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:52:07 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202497145</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What precedence was established by the case</title>
         <author>krick19595</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202497750</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The case was established not to be a violation of the fourth amendment, however the courts concluded that there was a violation of Reddings rights.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:53:04 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202497750</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>How did the court decide the case?</title>
         <author>tdieckman01275</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202497806</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Due to her age, T.L.O. faced delinquency charges in Juvenile Court.&nbsp; The Juvenile Court denied T.L.O.’s motion to suppress (keep out) her confession and the evidence from the search. Her lawyer argued that the search of her purse was a violation of the Fourth Amendment. T.L.O. was found delinquent, and was put on probation&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:53:10 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202497806</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why did the court reach that decision?</title>
         <author>tdieckman01275</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202499311</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;Agreed with the lower courts that the Fourth Amendment is applicable to the conduct of school officials; also agreed that school officials may conduct a warrantless search of a student when they have reasonable grounds to believe that a student possesses evidence of illegal activity or activity that interferes with school discipline and order.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:55:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202499311</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Why did the court reach that decision? </title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202499467</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The privacy interests compromised by urine samples are negligible since the conditions of collection are similar to public restrooms, and the results are viewed only by limited authorities.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:55:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202499467</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What precedence was established by the case?</title>
         <author>tdieckman01275</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202501858</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Supreme Court has a long history of upholding citizens' protections against unreasonable searches and seizures-a right guaranteed by the 4th Amendment. In <em>Weeks</em> v. <em>United States</em>, 1914, the Court ruled that evidence obtained by police illegally is not admissible in federal court-a practice known as the exclusionary rule.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 13:59:19 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202501858</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> how did the court decide on the case</title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202503365</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the court decided that&nbsp; The Fourth Amendment prohibition against unlawful searches and seizures applies to Weeks and the evidence thus seized must be excluded from prosecuting him. the decision was made after the  Court held that the seizure of items from Weeks' residence directly violated his constitutional rights. The Court also held that the government's refusal to return Weeks' possessions violated the Fourth Amendment.&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 14:01:39 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202503365</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The procedent</title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202504989</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Schools are allowed to drug test students in extracurricular activities.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 14:04:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202504989</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Sources </title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202507523</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/94-590">https://www.oyez.org/cases/1994/94-590</a><br><a href="https://www.britannica.com/event/Vernonia-School-District-47J-v-Acton">https://www.britannica.com/event/Vernonia-School-District-47J-v-Acton</a></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 14:07:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202507523</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>By: Marshall Schiele</title>
         <author>mschiele61062</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202509219</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 14:10:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202509219</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>why was the decision  made </title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202663263</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the decision was made because in order &nbsp; To allow private documents to be seized and then held as evidence against citizens it would have meant that the protection of the Fourth Amendment declaring the right to be secure against such searches and seizures would be of no value whatsoever. This was the first application of what eventually became known as the "exclusionary rule."</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 18:35:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202663263</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>precedence established by the case </title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202671004</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>the precedence established by the case was the application of what eventually became know as the 'exclusionary rule''</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 18:51:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202671004</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>link</title>
         <author>acalderon64843</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202673502</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><a href="https://www.oyez.org/cases/1900-1940/232us383">link</a>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-11-01 18:57:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/mschiele61062/gdul6mxdludc/wish/202673502</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
