Article: Free speech or hate speech? On the article, by journalist and Islam reported Abigail Hauslohner, talks about the legal battle universities in California are facing between two Islamic groups, the Pro-Israel and the Pro-Palestine.  Each group is claim that the other group is making hateful and racist speeches that threat their rights and safety.  Now, the challenge Universities not only in California but around the US are facing is whether or not the prohibition of those speeches would violate the First Amendment.  We just saw that happened this past week, when white supremacists Richard Spencer visited the Florida University to give a speech about his ideologies.  The ethical and moral dilemma behind this issue is whether or not hate or racist speech should be allowed.  The article asks the following questions “when does a speech become an incitement to violence or a support for racism?” and “do offensive speech or actions qualify as hate speech should be regulated?”  My question is, how the First Amendment should be interpreted? And when does a statement, an idea or speech goes beyond of what is socially acceptable? As far as the white supremacist group or neo-Nazis, their name title itself of the groups in my own view it is in fact a statement for racism, do you agree? Lastly and an excellent example of the First Amendment right, is the clash between the private corporation of the NFL and the elected president related to the kneeling during the play of the national anthem. 
~