1. Introduction :

   •Hook: Day by day, the use of cars, motorcycles, cars more and more, which is causing traffic congestion on the road.

2. Background information :

   Therefore, we need to take measures to prevent such congestion. transportation overcrowding has been considered as a problematic question to be solved in worldwide level.

   •Thesis Statement :

   -reducing cars does not mean that government could rein in traffic jam. -Instead of buying a car with high price including terrible taxes but carrying the whole family, people could choose to buy motorbikes for each member in their home.

   2.Body paragraphs:

   -contend that a more effective measure that could be taken to eradicate these problems resulted from transportation is a government subsidy for public transit services.

   -Governments can improve public transit by having more public transit available, making it more punctual and reducing the price of the tickets. -Were this solution to be applied, numerous citizens would use public transit systems as primary means transportation, which ultimately reduce the level of pollution and ease the increasing congestion on roads.

3. In conclusion

   advantages of the solution are that people could travel faster and air pollution would be reduced. So, the disadvantages of it are that it would become a big problem for those who lived in remote areas since public transports are rarely reaching them and also cause unemplovment issue.

Day by day, the use of cars, motorcycles, cars more and more, which is causing traffic congestion on the road. Therefore, we need to take measures to prevent such congestion. transportation overcrowding has been considered as a

problematic question to be solved in worldwide level.

However, Reducing cars does not mean that government could rein in traffic jam. Instead of buying a car with high price including terrible taxes but carrying the whole family, people could choose to buy motorbikes for each member in their home. This horrible perspective will definitely make the congestion in metropolitan zone get worse and extremely worse.Furthermore, not only could a car carry four to seven people but also weighty goods, this lowers the number of accidents which are because of carrying unwieldy things by motorbikes.As the consequence, the government should not charge that prohibitive tax.to cars for the residents' safety and convenience.On the other hand, contend that a more effective measure that could be taken to eradicate these problems resulted from transportation is a government subsidy for public transit services. Governments can improve public transit by having more public transit available, making it more punctual and reducing the price of the tickets. Were this solution to be applied, numerous citizens would use public transit systems as primary means transportation, which ultimately reduce the level of pollution and ease the increasing congestion on roads .So, Traffic congestion and noise pollution have become a global problem therefore, in response to this issue, the government has increased the tax on vehicles in an aim to address the problem.I strongly disagree with this.

In conclusion, So advantages of the solution are that people could travel faster and air pollution would be reduced. So, the disadvantages of it are that it would become a big problem for those who lived in remote areas since public transports are rarely reaching them and also cause unemplovment issue.

Put a check (✅) as appropriate.

✅1. Does the introduction include a hook and a thesis?

✅2. Do the body paragraphs have topic sentences?

✅3. Do the body paragraphs give reasons and explanations that support the topic sentences?

❎4. Does the second body paragraph give a counter-argument and a refutation?

✅5. Does the conclusion refer to the main idea of the essay?

✅6. Are quantity expressions used to avoid over generalization?

✅7. Are connectors used to show the relationship (opposition or support) between ideas?

Day by day, the use of cars, motorcycles, cars more and more, which is causing traffic congestion on the road. Therefore, we need to take measures to prevent such congestion. transportation overcrowding has been considered as a

problematic question to be solved in worldwide level.

However, Reducing cars does not mean that government could rein in traffic jam. Instead of buying a car with high price including terrible taxes but carrying the whole family, people could choose to buy motorbikes for each member in their home.

This horrible perspective will definitely make the congestion in metropolitan zone get worse and extremely worse.Furthermore, not only could a car carry four to seven people but also weighty goods, this lowers the number of accidents which are because of carrying unwieldy things by motorbikes. As the consequence, the government should not charge that prohibitive tax.to cars for the residents' safety and convenience.On the other hand, contend that a more effective measure that could be taken to eradicate these problems resulted from transportation is a government subsidy for public transit services. Governments can improve public transit by having more public transit available, making it more punctual and reducing the price of the tickets.

Were this solution to be applied, numerous citizens would use public transit systems as primary means transportation, which ultimately reduce the level of pollution and ease the increasing congestion on roads .So, Traffic congestion and noise pollution have become a global problem therefore, in response to this issue, the government has increased the tax on vehicles in an aim to address the problem.I strongly disagree with this.

In conclusion, So advantages of the solution are that people could travel faster and air pollution would be reduced. So, the disadvantages of it are that it would become a big problem for those who lived in remote areas since public transports are rarely reaching them and also cause unemplovment issue.

I. Introduction

-Hook: Have you ever wondered why the government doesn't care much about exploring the deep ocean? Should they begin to explore it?

-Background Information:

• Oceans remain largely unexplored that covering more than 70% of the earth.

• There are more than 80% of ocean is unexplored

-Thesis Statement: In this essay, we will discuss why governments should allocate more resources to deep ocean exploration due to it potentially beneficial.

II. Body Paragraphs

• Mysterious benefits and geographical information

• Economic growth and discovery resources

• Environmental impact and climate change

• Technology innovation and cooperation

III. Conclusion

In conclusion, invest more in deep ocean exploration can have the advantage such as science discovery, environmental studies and technological innovation. Government should explore more and unlock the opportunities in order to ensure the sustainable future.

Have you ever wondered why the government doesn’t care much about exploring the deep ocean? Should they begin to explore it? Well, oceans remain largely unexplored that covering more than 70% of the earth. In this essay, we will discuss why governments should allocate more resources to deep ocean exploration due to it potentially beneficial.

The first potential is its mysterious that can lead to a rich of countless species and geological formations. After discovering, governments will have understood more about biodiversity, geology and climate change. More than this, exploring deep sea can help the economy grow faster and the new discoveries of resources. The ocean is rich of minerals and energy sources that can help the government and ordinary in many ways. The researchers can meet global demands and reduce the environmental impact of terrestrial mining. One more thing, this can help the environment and climate research. As we know, the climate change play a major role in every day life in order to make life more sustainable and the deep sea can improve our knowledge of climate processes and help develop the ability to protect marine biodiversity. The last thing is the most essential part of why governments should explore deep oceans, technology innovation. Oceans play an important role in collaborating. It’s help to create a foster the international cooperation and technological innovation.The benefits of this is allowed other industries to develop and promote the global knowledge development.

In conclusion, invest more in deep ocean exploration can have the advantage such as science discovery, environmental studies and technological innovation. Government should explore more and unlock the opportunities in order to ensure the sustainable future.

Put a check (✅) as appropriate.

✅1. Does the introduction include a hook and a thesis?

✅ 2. Do the body paragraphs have topic sentences?

✅3. Do the body paragraphs give reasons and explanations that

support the topic sentences?

✅4. Does the second body paragraph give a counter-argument

and a refutation?

✅5. Does the conclusion refer to the main idea of the essay?

✅6. Are quantity expressions used to avoid overgeneralizations?

✅7. Are connectors used to show the relationship (opposition or

support) between ideas?

Have you ever wondered why the government doesn’t care much about exploring the deep ocean? Should they begin to explore it? Well, oceans remain largely unexplored that covering more than 70% of the earth. In this essay, we will discuss why governments should allocate more resources to deep ocean exploration due to it potentially beneficial.

The first potential is its mysterious that can lead to a rich of countless species and geological formations. After discovering, governments will have understood more about biodiversity, geology and climate change. More than this, exploring deep sea can help the economy grow faster and the new discoveries of resources. The ocean is rich of minerals and energy sources that can help the government and ordinary in many ways. The researchers can meet global demands and reduce the environmental impact of terrestrial mining. One more thing, this can help the environment and climate research. As we know, the climate change play a major role in every day life in order to make life more sustainable and the deep sea can improve our knowledge of climate processes and help develop the ability to protect marine biodiversity. The last thing is the most essential part of why governments should explore deep oceans, technology innovation. Oceans play an important role in collaborating. It’s help to create a foster the international cooperation and technological innovation.The benefits of this is allowed other industries to develop and promote the global knowledge development.

In conclusion, invest more in deep ocean exploration can have the advantage such as science discovery, environmental studies and technological innovation. Government should explore more and unlock the opportunities in order to ensure the sustainable future.