<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>SRM Poster by Klára Věntusová</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2021-11-30 15:38:33 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-12-30 18:58:14 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Research question:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1920808807</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>How did the practitioners understand the concept of risk, to what extent was this understanding reflected in the reports, and how did it affect the possibilities for action?<br></strong><br>With this research question, I would first like to explore how the practitioners understood risk in relation to their company. In other words, I would like to discuss what the problem was represented to be.<br><br>The second part of the research question tries to explore the extent to which we, as students, accepted the premise of the practitioners - how can this be seen in the reports. In other words, to what extent did we just accept what was presented to us?<br><br>Finally, I would like to use the answers to the first two questions to explore how the practitioners' understanding of risk and the extent to which we accepted this affected the possibilities for action. The last question aims to bring together the discussed themes and dig a bit deeper into the importance of analysing conceptual use.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 16:17:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1920808807</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Aim:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1920846820</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The aim of this paper is to reflect on the case studies - how they were presented to us, how we worked with them, and how it affects the possibilities of action. I would also like to try to compare the three selected cases to explore the difference between the practitioners' understandings of risk and also see if we, for example, accepted their premise more in one case than in another.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 16:32:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1920846820</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Background:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1920866056</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The background that determined the focus of this paper is a point made by some of the practitioners about the client sometimes thinking that their biggest risk is one thing while after discussing it with the practitioners, there is another risk that should be highlighted instead.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 16:39:47 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1920866056</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Cases that I focus on:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921110030</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1) Danske Bank<br>2) Control Risks<br>3) PET</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 18:20:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921110030</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>References:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921112448</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp; Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm (2003) Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann, Policy Press. Chapters 1+5, pp. 1-33 and 93-118.<br>&nbsp; Control Risks. (2021). RiskMap 2022. https://www.controlrisks.com/riskmap.<br>&nbsp; Danske Bank Group. (2020). Risk Management. https://danskebank.com/-/media/danske-bank-com/file-cloud/2021/2/risk-management-2020.pdf?rev=25603689101af84815de20ba0edf3<br>&nbsp; Danske Bank Group. (2019). Statement on IT inspection at Danske Bank A/S. https://danskebank.com/-/media/danske-bank-com/pdf/investor-relations/fsa-statements/statement-on-it-inspection-at-danske-bank-dated-20-nov-2019.pdf?rev=615a0107c6ea4edd9f660b5f3ee58c85&amp;hash=FD8AAFC8537C6E8F81EB32B1D76A697E.<br>&nbsp; Dunn Cavelty, M. (2015) “Cyber Security and Private Actors” in Handbook of Private Security Studies, Abrahamsen, R. and Leander, A. (eds.) (London: Routledge) pp. 89-100.<br>&nbsp; Dunn Cavelty, Myriam &amp; Andreas Wenger (2020) Cyber security meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science, Contemporary Security Policy, 41:1, 5-32.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; Ifversen, Jan (2011) “About key concepts and how to study them” Contributions to the History of Concepts, 6:1, pp. 65-88.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; Koselleck, Reinhart (1989) “Linguistic Change and the History of Events”, The Journal of Modern History, Vol. 61, No. 4 (Dec., 1989), pp. 649-666.<br>&nbsp; Koselleck, Reinhart (1985) “Begriffsgeschichte and Social History”, in Reinhart Koselleck, Futures Past, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 73-91. &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;PET. (2021). Is your research at risk?. https://www.pet.dk/Nyheder/2021/~/media/Publikationer/PETsiencedigitalversionUKpdf.ashx.<br>&nbsp; PET. (2019). Annual report 2019. https://www.pet.dk/English/~/media/Aarsberetninger/PETAnnualReport2019pdf.ashx.<br>&nbsp; Petersen, Karen Lund (2019) Teaching Innovation: Preparing for an uncertain future, chapter 1 and 3, Djøfs Forlag.<br>&nbsp; Rasmussen, Mikkel Vedby (2010) Risk and security. International Studies Compendium. Oxford: Blackwell, Publishing. Available at: www.isacompendium.com<br>&nbsp; Richter, Melvin (1995) The History of Political and Social Concepts, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chapter 2, pp. 26-57.&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; Schedler, Andreas (2011) “Concept formation”, in International Encyclopedia of Political Science, ed. by Bertrand Badie et al, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 371-383.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 18:21:54 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921112448</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Analytical strategy:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921113608</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Conceptual History<br>- focusing on a key concept: risk<br>- examining if/how the concept is used differently in each case, in each of the three contexts<br><br>- Koselleck and German school<br>a) looking at the context of each organisation to understand the understanding of risk<br>b) how the concept of risk establishes horizons for experience, sets limits on what we can imagine - how can this be seen in the presentations of the practitioners and then in our reports<br>c) how the meaning of concepts changes in different semantic fields - how was the meaning of risk different in each of the three cases<br><br>- Synchronic analysis - specific to each case:&nbsp;<br>a) how practitioners used the concept of risk, examining their intentions and contextual constraints<br>b) how did we use the concept of risk in the reports and our contextual constraints<br><br>- Diachronic analysis - the same for all three cases<br>a) I would like to borrow the diachronic analysis from a scholar and relate it to my work in the synchronic analysis</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 18:22:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921113608</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Theory:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921114130</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Rasmussen (2010)<br>- security has been replaced by risk<br>- we moved from a world of national security to a globalised world<br>- perfect security is no longer possible to achieve<br>- new risks arising because of a boomerang effect<br>- turn to risk management practices<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 18:22:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921114130</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Tentative results:</title>
         <author>klariventusova</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921114813</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- the conceptualisation of risk differs across the three cases<br>- In terms of the extent to which the reports reflect the understanding of risk of the practitioner: the more specific were the instructions in the case, the more we followed the conceptualisation of the risk by the practitioner. Therefore, in the case of Control Risks, we followed the same conceptualisation of risk to a greater extent than in the cases of PET and Danske Bank.<br>- how it affects the possibilities for action: we are likely to miss something else if our conceptualisation of risk is too narrow and if we accept the premise of the practitioner without critical consideration first<br>&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2021-11-30 18:22:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/klariventusova/g1xqi66szv04nr1j/wish/1921114813</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
