Inductive & Deductive Arguments Activity by Courtney Swann https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm Fire hydrant situation en-us 2017-11-15 13:52:44 UTC 2026-01-28 02:02:19 UTC hello@padlet.com Discuss the various conclusions your group reached cswann0226 https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207181778 Kaitlin- there is water everywhere
Ava- wonders if the water pressure made it go wrong
Shanita- it has to be cleaned up
Me- there is a mess in the streets
As a group: We do not know why it exploded but there is a mess and someone has to clean it up

]]> 2017-11-15 13:54:32 UTC https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207181778 Were there any debates or disagreements? cswann0226 https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207182350 Yes, we had a hard time coming up with a conclusion ]]> 2017-11-15 13:55:43 UTC https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207182350 Did any one fact set seem more conclusive than another? If so, why? How did additional fact sets change students’ theories about the event? cswann0226 https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207182585 Kaitlin's conclusion made a lot of sense but did not change our theory about the event. It was agreed upon that it would be obvious that water would be everywhere if a water hydrant exploded]]> 2017-11-15 13:56:10 UTC https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207182585 cswann0226 https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207185235 2017-11-15 14:01:08 UTC https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207185235 cswann0226 https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207185649 2017-11-15 14:01:51 UTC https://padlet.com/cswann0226/fxrjo19fguvm/wish/207185649