<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Tinker v Des Moines by Courtney Wint</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-09-25 15:49:38 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-09-27 01:46:43 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Names of plaintiff and defendant</title>
         <author>2040325</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/285629885</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The plaintiff were students John and Mary Tinker. The defendant was Des Moines Independent Community School District.</div><div><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-25 16:13:09 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/285629885</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Facts of the case of Tinker v Des Moines</title>
         <author>2040310</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286295687</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>1. The case involves 3 minors: John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt<br>2. These three kids were suspended from their schools for wearing black armbands to protest the Vietnam War.<br>3. Courts in the state of Iowa both ruled that black armbands, which represented bad feelings towards the Vietnam<br> War, was inappropriate attire for school.<br>4. The students kept appealing the rulings because they felt they were entitled to expressing themselves as American citizens. <br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-26 23:54:43 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286295687</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Date of initial lawsuit and Supreme Court Ruling   </title>
         <author>2040310</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286300743</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The date of the initial lawsuit was November 12, 1968 and the final Supreme Court ruling was February 24, 1969.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-27 00:28:14 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286300743</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Nature of the dispute ( what does each side want?)</title>
         <author>2040310</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286301413</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The students wanted a freedom of speech to help protest the Vietnam War and later the verdict reached by the court in Tinker v. Des Moines created a law that gave power to school systems. . The school wanted the students to stop wearing the armbands because it can "disrupt learning".</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-27 00:31:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286301413</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Decision of Court</title>
         <author>2040325</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286302135</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Decision made in court was 7-2 in favor of Tinker. The 7 judges decided that the kids wearing armbands wasn't a direct disruption of school activity.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-27 00:36:00 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286302135</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>The &quot;test&quot; or standard provided by the court</title>
         <author>2040310</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286303276</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>It is the decision by the United states supreme court that defines the constitutional rights of students in public schools. Basically, the first amendment. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-27 00:44:12 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286303276</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>2040310</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286309925</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://constitutioncenter.org/images/uploads/blog/marybethjohntinker.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-27 01:24:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286309925</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>2040310</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286310051</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/styles/callout/public/tinker_podcast_large.jpg?itok=_ie87E7N" />
         <pubDate>2018-09-27 01:25:37 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/2040325/ftfayesbiir2/wish/286310051</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
