<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Graffiti Wall Reading Log by Melinda Nguyen</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm</link>
      <description>Part 5-6</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-10-27 19:13:06 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2025-06-12 13:02:51 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>2. Words and Phrases</title>
         <author>m_nguyen</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297679375</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- to accuse<br>- honesty <br>- lies<br>- truth<br>- acquaintance<br>- jail cell<br>- courtroom <br>- defendants <br>- to take the stand<br>- prosecution <br>- to testify<br>- cigarettes <br>- to give a signal<br>- getover<br>- attorneys </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-27 19:15:32 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297679375</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>3. Connect</title>
         <author>m_nguyen</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297827028</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Connection to world (news):<br>Davontae Sanford has been incarcerated for the murder of four people at a Detroit drug house. He was just 14 in September 2007 when police found him in his pajamas near the crime scene, and after two days of interrogations, announced that he had confessed. 9 years later, Sanford is expected to walk out of prison a free man. Prosecutors acknowledge the now-23-year-old had known the truth all along: He didn't do it. Here are the similarities of this case with the book: First of all, the accused are both teenagers. Second, they are both accused of murder. Last, Davontae and Steve are both innocent.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-28 23:47:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297827028</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>4. Vocabulary </title>
         <author>m_nguyen</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297827066</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- Elicit (p.245): to call forth or draw out (something, such as information or a response)<br><br>- Vicinity (p.248): a surrounding area or district</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-28 23:47:58 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297827066</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>5. Summary </title>
         <author>m_nguyen</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297827103</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>There are two new witnesses: Dorothy Moore, King’s cousin, who confirmed that he was dropping by at her house to give her a lamp on the day of the crime and George Nippins, who affirms that King is left handed, so he couldn’t be the shooter since the wound was on the left side of the body. Additionally, O’Brien wants Steve to take the stand so the jury can separate Steve from King and in the contrary, Briggs wants to make sure the jury connects King and Steve because Steve looks like a pretty decent guy. Steve’s testimony tells us that he wasn’t at the drugstore the day of the crime, he was taking notes for school project and King is an acquaintance to him. In Briggs’ summation, he says that Bobo is lying about King’s implication in the crime because he just wants the deal that the police offered him if he implicates someone else. In O’Brien’s summation, she says that no one saw Steve at the drugstore that day and that the jury shouldn’t believe Bobo Evans and Osvaldo Cruz testimonies because it was self-interest. According to Petrocelli, the case is not about the character of the witnesses, but about the crime in which a man was killed. At the end of the trial, King is found guilty and Steve not guilty. However, Steve doesn’t know who he is anymore and neither does his father. His father is doubting about what he still doesn’t know about his son and O’Brien still thinks Steve is guilty.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-28 23:48:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297827103</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>1. Graffiti </title>
         <author>m_nguyen</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297838845</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/225092149/827b5e9e8dedd1f26645f23f08749c62/public.jpeg" />
         <pubDate>2018-10-29 01:04:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/m_nguyen/fmk16v2nsggm/wish/297838845</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
