Can you use these sources for a scholarly text? Why? Why not? How? by Lina Ahlgren https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27 en-us 2022-03-21 10:42:03 UTC 2025-04-24 08:40:12 UTC hello@padlet.com 2 linaahlgren https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2105021518 2022-03-21 10:42:36 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2105021518 3 linaahlgren https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2105021630 2022-03-21 10:42:43 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2105021630 1 linaahlgren https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2116847119 2022-03-28 10:17:29 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2116847119 A press article can be used for a press review or to give like an example but it can't be the main source for scholarly text. Moreover, the article says "the researchers" without quoting its own sources, references,... https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121048429 2022-03-30 08:31:53 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121048429 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121052144 Can be used in an introduction of a paper or in an outlining of the field of study/problem area (what is said in society about this topic, etc.), because news articles state what is going on]]> 2022-03-30 08:33:49 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121052144 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121052617 University press research article. Is a reliable source as it has also been peer reviewed.

]]> 2022-03-30 08:34:08 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121052617 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121053672 Wikipedia isn't a reliable source and many people can edit the text, meaning content could be false.]]> 2022-03-30 08:34:51 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121053672 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121053680 You cannot call this article a scholarly material because it is not peer reviewed or published by university or research institutions. But you can use it as a news paper, which can be used as a complementary of your own article, but not the core of the argument.]]> 2022-03-30 08:34:52 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121053680 We are not sure that it is a page written only by searchers. Even if there are sources and references, we can't guarantee their liability. Moreover, there is no strict method of development. We can use the page to discover new references on the topic after carefully checking them. https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121053710 2022-03-30 08:34:54 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121053710 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121054915 Can be used in a scholarly text because it is a university published article written by a scholar  ]]> 2022-03-30 08:35:45 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121054915 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121054917 Can be used carefully to exemplify arguments and theory. You need to look at the references and see where the date are coming from. Always use a critical eye on it. ]]> 2022-03-30 08:35:45 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121054917 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121055339 Newspaper shouldn't be the main source of information but could be a first approach. Also depends on what newspaper it is, and whether it is more reliable than others. ]]> 2022-03-30 08:36:05 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121055339 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121055715 This is a scholarly article, both the authors are researchers at Stockholm University, it is published by Duke University Press, follows the appropriate format and builds on previous research/data. This can be used as a main source for a scholarly text.]]> 2022-03-30 08:36:23 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121055715 The scholar method is respected and there is a real and well made bibliography. We checked their names on Google and they are teachers at Stockholm University. Then, it's a reliable article that we can use to argument our scholarly text. https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121057614 2022-03-30 08:37:44 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121057614 https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121058553 everyone can rewrite and edit wikipedia, so we don't know if he or she is scholar or not. So it is not scholarly material. It is not peer reviewed. you can look at its references if it is related to you paper, but you should not use the actual articles. ]]> 2022-03-30 08:38:25 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121058553 Everyone can write at Wikipedia and therefore it's not reliable, but you can use it to search for references with a critical view https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121060133 2022-03-30 08:38:47 UTC https://padlet.com/lunduniversity/SASA27/wish/2121060133