Sweatshop Articles by Kerstin Murry https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5 Not made with a warm hug en-us 2018-03-26 15:48:38 UTC 2018-04-09 15:55:50 UTC hello@padlet.com Kerstin Article 1 kmurry19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246580447 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted?
Saturday 3 December 2016 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
People interested in how people are treated in the sweat shops
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
Gethen Chamberlain
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
Media Limit
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
Doesn’t have any, simple journalist
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
Yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
Yes; .com


Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
A Mattel spokesman, ICTI care with is investigation
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Yes quotes from people they’ve talked to
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
No
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
The tone seems unbiased and includes a clear reprensentation of what is occuring without personal opinnions
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
To inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Facts from what is actually happening by the workers
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
Yes
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
No

]]> 2018-03-27 16:27:37 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246580447 Kiana Article 1 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246582395 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? December 18, 2017
  • Has the information been revised or updated? yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? current
  • Are the links functional? yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? yes
  • Who is the intended audience? Anyone interested in the working conditions of chinese sweatshops
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Michelle Chen
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? n/a
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? no
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? no
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? a campaign
  • Is the information supported by evidence? yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? no
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? no
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? no

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? Inform, teach
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? NO
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? impartial
Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? yes
]]> 2018-03-27 16:31:49 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246582395 Alana Article 1 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246604433 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? This was published or posted on December 12, 2016
  • Has the information been revised or updated?  It was revised then but since has not been updated.
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic?  The information is current for my topic.
  • Are the links functional? Yes they are functional.

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Yes it relates to my topi and answer.
  • Who is the intended audience? The intended audience are those who can make a difference.
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Very appropriate
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes I have looked at different sites

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?  Olivia Lambert, News.com.au,China Labour Watch
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? She is affiliated with the Border Mail and NSW-Victorian border.
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? She has done extensive reasearch and has even asked some of the workers questions on the topic.
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? There is publisher contact info.
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org  Yes it is .com.

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? The info comes from china.
  • Is the information supported by evidence?  The evidence is proven in pictures.
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? The information is reviewed.
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? Yes I can verify this info.
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?  It is not totally biased or free of emotion.
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? No
    Purpose: The reason the information exists.
  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? The purpose of the article is to inform.
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? The information is fact.
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? objective
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? There is a personal bias considering it is such a harsh topic.
]]> 2018-03-27 17:15:28 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246604433 Alana Article 2 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246719257 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? FRIDAY, 23 SEPTEMBER 2017
  • Has the information been revised or updated? YES WEDNESDAY, 12 OCTOBER
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? IT IS CURENT TO MY TOPIC
  • Are the links functional? YES

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? YES
  • Who is the intended audience? THE PEOPLE WHO CAN EFFECT CHANGE
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? YES
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? YES

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? JANE CAI, SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST , INVESTIGATIONS DONE ON THE MATTER
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? YES SHE APART OF THE BEIJEING BUREAU CHEIF FOR THE SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic?  SHE HAS BEEN COVERING THE ECONOMIC,FINANCIAL, BUSINESS AND POLITICAL NEWS SINCE 2000.
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? YES, EMAIL
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org  YES .COM

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? IT COMES FROM INVESTIGATIONS, PROVEN STUDIES AND ASKING THE WORKERS.
  • Is the information supported by evidence? YES
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? YES
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? YES YOU CAN VERIFY THE INFO THER WERE EVEN PICTURES GIVEN
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? YES
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? NO

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? TO PERSUADE AND INFORM THE AUDIENCE ABOUT THW SITUATIONS THAT ARE OCCURING WITHIN SWEATSHOPS.
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? YES
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? IT IS MAINLY FACT 
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? IT IS IMPARTIAL ON THE PART OF THE WORKERS.
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? THERE IS A CULTURAL BIAS.
]]> 2018-03-27 23:48:15 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246719257 Alana Article 3 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246720478 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? TUESDAY,22 NOVEMBER 2016
  • Has the information been revised or updated? NOT THAT I AM AWARE OF.
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? YES IT IS CURRENT.
  • Are the links functional? YES

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? YES
  • Who is the intended audience? THE INTENDED AUDIENCE IS FOR THE PEOPLE THAT CARE ABOUT THE WELL BEING OF OTHERS.
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? YES
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? YES A WIDE VARIETY.

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? MANDY ZOU,SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST.
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? NO SHE IS A NEW AUTHOR FOR THE POST.
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? SHE IS A NEW AND ASPIRING AUTHOR FOR THE COMPANY
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? YES
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? YES .COM
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from?  IT COMES FROM INVESTIGATIONS AND SPOKEN TESTIMONIES
  • Is the information supported by evidence? YES
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? NO
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? YES
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? NO
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? NO

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? TO TEACH AND INFORM 
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? YES
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? PROPAGANDA
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? IMPARTIAL
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? CULTURAL BIAS
]]> 2018-03-27 23:57:00 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246720478 Alana article 4 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246722422 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? November 22, 2016
  • Has the information been revised or updated? Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? It is current for the topic.
  • Are the links functional? Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? The audience is the world or anyone that can help the situation.
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Elizabeth Segran,Fast Company, 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? A staff writer for Fast Company
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? Yes PhD in Journalism 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? Yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source? Yes .com
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from?  The information comes from prior research and investigations that have taken place.
  • Is the information supported by evidence? Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? Yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? No 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? To inform the audience.
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? YES
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? IT IS FACT
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? IT IS OBJECTIVE
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? THERE IS A IDEOLOGICAL BIAS
]]> 2018-03-28 00:11:21 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246722422 Kiana Article 2 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246741955 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? January 5, 2008
  • Has the information been revised or updated? no
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? current
  • Are the links functional? Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? Anyone trying to understand working conditions of China
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? David Barboza/ Nnew York Times
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? Yes; correspondent for New York Times and freelance writer  & research assistance
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? Won various Pulitzer Prizes for explanatory writings and for his ability to explain what happens in China
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? No
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org  No

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? China
  • Is the information supported by evidence? yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? No
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? to inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?  impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? No
]]> 2018-03-28 02:09:38 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246741955 Kiana Article 3 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246743383 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? January 25, 2013
  • Has the information been revised or updated? Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? current
  • Are the links functional? yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? yes
  • Who is the intended audience? Anyone trying to understand working conditions of China
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Rob Cooper
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic?  No
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?  No
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org  No

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? Other sources
  • Is the information supported by evidence? Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? no
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? yes
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? yes

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? to inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? impartial
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? no 
]]> 2018-03-28 02:20:21 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246743383 Kiana Article 4 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246743574 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? November 25, 2016
  • Has the information been revised or updated? No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? current
  • Are the links functional? yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? Anyone wondering about the conditions of workers who make toys
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?  Child Labor Watch
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? China Labor Watch (CLW) is an independent not-for-profit
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? collaborated with unions, labor organizations, and the media to conduct in-depth assessments of factories in China that produce toys, bikes, shoes, furniture, clothing, and electronics for some of the largest multinational brand companies
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org yes

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? assessments of the factories
  • Is the information supported by evidence? yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? no
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? no
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? no

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? to inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? impartial 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? no
]]> 2018-03-28 02:21:32 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246743574 Kerstin Article 2 kmurry19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246745218 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted?
November 17, 2016 11:07 PM 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? 
Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
working people
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor?
voa news 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
None
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
Yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
.com

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
New York-based China Labor Watch
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
Yes
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion?
Unbiased 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
Yes

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
To inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial?
Yes 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
No

]]> 2018-03-28 02:31:27 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246745218 Kerstin Article 3 kmurry19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246750057 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 
December 5, 2012
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
Yes 
  • Who is the intended audience? 
People interested in how children are treated in sweatshops
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
Dario Berrebi
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
Digital strategist and filmaker
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
researcher
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? 
Yes
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
.org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
Child Labor and globalization and others
  • Is the information supported by evidence? 
Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
No
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? 
Yes
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Unbiased
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
To inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
Yes
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
No

]]> 2018-03-28 03:05:47 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246750057 Kerstin Article 4 kmurry19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246753241 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted?
May 30, 2017
  • Has the information been revised or updated? 
No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? 
Current
  • Are the links functional? 

Yes


Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question?
 Yes
  • Who is the intended audience? 
Working people
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? 
Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? 
Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? 
Nicht Angemeldt
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they?
Intern
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? 
Intern
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address?
Yes 
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org 
.org

Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? 
Huffingtonpost and others
  • Is the information supported by evidence?
Yes 
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? 
No
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge?
Yes 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
Unbiased
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? 
No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? 
To inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? 
yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? 
Yes
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? 
Yes
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases?
No

]]> 2018-03-28 03:30:15 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246753241 Melina Article 1 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246760331 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 2014 December 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? It’s current
  • Are the links functional? Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? It answers my question and relates to my topic
  • Who is the intended audience? Adults or the people who keep up with bbc news, or an average person
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? It is appropriate, easy to comprehend 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? The author is Richard Bilton and the sponser is bbc news
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? No only a name 
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? There are none given to prove that the author is qualified 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? No
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
 The url is a .com and I feel it would bethe same as cnn.com, it’s just not as well known
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? Shanghai 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? Yes 
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? It may have been reviewed 
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? Yes 
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? It is free of emotion
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? Inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? Impartial 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? No
]]> 2018-03-28 04:17:33 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246760331 Melina Article 2 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246761767 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 2007 August 
  • Has the information been revised or updated? Yes
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? Current
  • Are the links functional? Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? Both
  • Who is the intended audience? Anyone at a high school reading level
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Eric Clark is the author and the sponsor is dailymail.co.uk
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? No qualifications given 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? No
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
It’s a .com so I believe it to be a credible source
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? China
  • Is the information supported by evidence? Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? Yes?
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? No
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? It seems unbiased 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? Inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? The point of view is impartial 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? No
]]> 2018-03-28 04:32:50 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246761767 Melina Article 3 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246762405 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 2016 June
  • Has the information been revised or updated? No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? No
  • Are the links functional? Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? It relates to my topic
  • Who is the intended audience? Ones who think of workers
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes it is at an appropriate level 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Aaron Smith is the author and the sponsor would be cnn.com 
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? No
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? None are given  
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? No
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org


The url is to cnn which lots of people happen to trust for their daily news
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? Bangladesh, Cambodia, India and Indonesia
  • Is the information supported by evidence? Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? No
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? No
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? 
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? The tone seems very unbiased 

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? To inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? No 
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? It seems to be impartial 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? There doesn’t seem to be any bias in the article 
]]> 2018-03-28 04:40:53 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246762405 Melina Article 4 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246763364 Currency: The timeliness of the information. 

  • When was the information published or posted? 2015 November
  • Has the information been revised or updated? No
  • Is the information current or out-of date for your topic? Current
  • Are the links functional? Yes

Relevance:The importance of the information for your needs. 

  • Does the information relate to your topic or answer your question? It relates to my topic
  • Who is the intended audience? Someone who has been keeping up with the poor conditions in work environments around the world 
  • Is the information at an appropriate level (i.e. not too elementary or advanced for your needs)? Yes it’s appropriate for my level of reading 
  • Have you looked at a variety of sources before determining this is one you will use? Yes

Authority: The source of the information. 

  • Who is the author/publisher/source/sponsor? Abena-agyeman-Fisher is the author and the sponsor would be refinery29.com
  • Are the author's credentials or organizational affiliations given? If yes, what are they? Only a name is given 
  • What are the author's qualifications to write on the topic? No qualifications are given by the website 
  • Is there contact information, such as a publisher or e-mail address? None
  • Does the URL reveal anything about the author or source?
         examples: .com .edu .gov .org
I think it tells the average person that they can trust the source. It's Familiar
Accuracy: The reliability, truthfulness, and correctness of the informational content.

  • Where does the information come from? Tanzania 
  • Is the information supported by evidence? Yes
  • Has the information been reviewed or refereed? No
  • Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? No
  • Does the language or tone seem biased and free of emotion? It is unbiased
  • Are there obvious errors (spelling, grammar, etc.)? No

Purpose: The reason the information exists.

  • What is the purpose of the information? to inform? teach? sell? entertain? persuade? Inform
  • Do the authors/sponsors make their intentions or purpose clear? Yes
  • Is the information fact? opinion? propaganda? Fact
  • Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? The information is impartial 
  • Are there political, ideological, cultural, religious, institutional, or personal biases? There doesn’t seem to be any bias in the Article 
]]> 2018-03-28 04:51:23 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/246763364 Kerstin Paragraph 4 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247310819 This article presents the topic of sweatshops through factual evidence with given sources, videos of workers statements, and a visual map location of the Foxconn company. At Foxconn, “Violations against workers have already been widely reported over the last decade”. This has only gotten attention due to international media about the riots and suicides reported at Foxconn company. While the Fair Labor Association inspected three of their factories, “They reported severe health and safety risks, and excessive hours of overtime without appropriate payments”. Workers in the factories also have certain liberties taken away, for example, “Workers are prohibited from using certain devices, their rooms are raided, and if they are found to have broken any rules, they have to confess their guilt publicly.”. This not only means their privacy and property is being violated but they are being publicly shamed over using items that they own. Even when the workers have breaks, “Time off is usually only used for rest as people regularly work shifts of 11 to 13 hours”. In this article I don’t identify any bias used in the writing.]]> 2018-03-29 16:08:21 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247310819 Kerstin Paragraph 3 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247310923 This article presents the topic of sweatshops by giving a basic history lesson of what the labor standards have gone to over the years. The article is also meant to inform and educate on what previous situations have been regarding labor. In the third sentence of the second paragraph in the article, the author says “ In other words, we all share a part of responsibility in this”, referring to what labor conditions and child labor has become. This is a tactic that places a form of guilt on the reader thinking they are a part of the problem when it wasn’t them directly. It is meant to make the reader feel attached to the situation in a way that pulls on their emotions to want to know more. This makes the article slightly biased due to the author including this form of thought by attaching it to himself and others when the rest of the article is solely relating to the facts on labor conditions.The author also states that, “The recent recrudescence in forced labor is hard to measure because it’s largely hidden away in sweatshops and factories owned by large corporations”.]]> 2018-03-29 16:08:38 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247310923 Kerstin Paragraph 2 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247310996 In the article, “Chinese Toymakers Have Miserable Working Conditions, Low Pay”, the author starts of by stating a common quote used relating to this topic, “The world of toys is a heaven for children, but may be a world of misery for toy factory workers”. With the wages too low to begin with, “ the vast majority of workers request overtime in order to supplement their basic earnings”. The article presents the topic by giving statements from some of the workers found in these factories followed by facts of what is actually happening within them. During the production of toys in the factory, the workers are exposed to toxic solvents which were “distributed in unlabeled plastic drinking bottles”. With exposure to these toxic solvents it could be detrimental to the workers health. “ The U.S Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says isoamyl acetate is considered dangerous to life after five hours of exposure at certain concentration levels”. I don’t identify any bias in the article due to all the facts presented and the sources in which that information came from.]]> 2018-03-29 16:08:50 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247310996 Kiana Paragraph 1 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314290 This article's title is, "China’s Mega Sweatshops: China’s Workers and the Emerging Youth “Intern Class”. This article is more from the point of view from students that have taken internships at certain companies, and have experienced the harsh environment. The author says, "These interns are often subjected to worse conditions and lower wages than the standard employees they work alongside in violation of China’s internship laws prohibiting 16- to 18-year old students from working overtime and night shifts." This quote infers that even as interns, the individuals are subjected to the unfavorable environment and treated even as they have already worked there. "Interns are excluded from core social-welfare obligations that accompany standard employment, saving companies from matching payments, while they work the comparable, backbreaking hours, often as many as 60 hours a week including overtime", this quote explains the settings and the struggles the students endure as they work in this sweatshop. This information is more factual than opinions, which bring some validity to the topic and situation. I do not detect any bias within the article.  ]]> 2018-03-29 16:17:29 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314290 Kerstin Paragraph 1 kmurry19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314585 This article presents the topic by starting off with a personal story of one of the workers, Xiao Fang. It is meant to grab your attention because you know its an actual person being affected by these sweatshops while being mistreated. The article shows what it’s like working in the Mattel Factory in Chang’an. For Xiao, “She works 11-hour days, and six days a week, and shares a dormitory with nine other women and gets to see her husband only once a week.”. The article also mentioned Xiao having to leave her three-year-old daughter at home in Sichuan. The author shows that when undercover investigators enter four factories to understand the conditions of what the workers were going through, they were in contact with isoamyl acetate. While investigating, “staff claimed that the company offered prizes for the three most productive workers everyday. The prize was a pack of paper towels”. Not only were they being prized with minimal items but forced to work extreme over time and more during peak periods. While the investigator was still in the factory, they “interviewed workers in the cutting section, who said they sometimes clocked up to 100 hours of overtime a month”. These workers were forced to work in rooms that could be as hot as 31 degrees Celsius. I don’t detect any bias in the article due to it being based on facts and data collected by first hand investigators and the ICTI Care Foundation.]]> 2018-03-29 16:18:19 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314585 Kiana Paragraph 2 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314612 This article is titled, "In Chinese Factories, Lost Fingers and Low Pay", and presents the topic of sweatshops in a way to emotionally appeal to the reader, as well as, inform the reader of the conditions within some sweatshops. However, the publisher presents the story with factual opinions from those familiar with the conditions of this particular sweatshop. "The group says some Chinese companies routinely shortchange their employees on wages, withhold health benefits and expose their workers to dangerous machinery and harmful chemicals, like lead, cadmium, and mercury." In this statement, you can see that the reader is being informed about how these workers are being treated. Two brother who both worked in this particular factory stated, "The brothers said they worked 12 hours a day, six days a week, for $120 to $200 a month, far less than they are required to be paid by law." This articles does not present any type of bias, due to the facts, and no distinct personal point of view. ]]> 2018-03-29 16:18:24 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314612 Kiana Paragraph 3 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314688 The article is titled, "Inside Apple's Chinese 'sweatshop' factory where workers are paid just £1.12 per hour to produce iPhones and iPads for the West", presents the topic of sweatshops in a way that informs one about the certain conditions, but within the article certain information seems to be exaggerated. "While the Nightline documentary knocks down those suggestions, it does show the suicide nets covering the whole site, in place to stop over-worked and stressed employees leaping to their deaths. Managers ordered asked for the nets to be put up two years ago after nine workers committed suicide in the space of three months." This quote suggests some exaggeration of the company installing nets due to their workers jumping to their deaths due to the harsh conditions of the workplace. However, the publisher/author, continues to tell about thing that have been said about how things work within the factory. "The broadcaster revealed that the entry-level salary of just £180 per month is so low that it would take more than two months salary to pay for the cheapest iPad. Even if the lowest earners do the maximum available overtime of 80 hours per month, they still do not earn enough to pay tax. Previous reports have claimed that some of the workers were doing 24 hours at a time, while others were forced to stand for their entire shifts." There is a bit of bias within the article, and a high level of exaggeration, to get a point across.  ]]> 2018-03-29 16:18:36 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314688 Kiana Paragraph 4 kstewart191 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314800 The article is titled, "An Investigation into Four Toy Sweatshops", presents the topic of sweatshops in a way that appeals to the audience emotionally, to cause them to think about how the workers of their children's favorite toys are treated, "The world of toys is a heaven for children, but may be a world of misery for toy factory workers."  The author of this article also presents the topic with accurate photos taken of the workplace, to rightfully show the conditions, and inform the reader that change is needed. The author goes on to identify the various laws and rights violated, which includes accurate statistics and information necessary to backup  their statements. "According to Chinese Labor Law, laborers shall work no more than 8 hours a day. In general, work hours can be prolonged, under certain circumstances and under the condition that the physical health of laborers is guaranteed. Overtime hours, however, cannot exceed 36 hours a month. Unfortunately, we found that the average working hours in these four factories was 11 hours a day, with more than 50 overtime hours a month, and at half of the factories, overtime hours had reached 100 hours, with the highest at above 130 hours. Moreover, the extremely high production requirements left workers with barely any time to rest. During the 11 hours that workers put in within a day, all they had was a 40-60 minutes’ lunch break. This is an obvious violation of the right of workers’ to having adequate rest." I do identify any bias of this article. ]]> 2018-03-29 16:18:51 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314800 Alana Paragraph 4 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314881 The article’s title is “When “Made in China” means Sustainable, Ethical, and Expert.” This is to display the idea of a a new type of system where workers are given a new type of labour experience. The article provides ideals and experimental results that draws the audience's attention. The author goes into detail of Ivanka Trumps involvement in the matter. Then further describes the amount of work hours and pay that the workers have.Just last month, the Washington Post revealed that the factory making Ivanka Trump’s clothing line compels employees to work 57 hours weekly, for just $62 a week, near or below China’s minimum wage.The bias of the article is ideological appealing to emotion intelligence and ideals. 

]]> 2018-03-29 16:19:04 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247314881 Alana Paragraph 3 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315087 This is yet another article that appeals to the emotions of the audience, using pictures and factual evidence. The author is using a cultural bias to help the reader to see the injustice and unfair treatment of the employers. The author solely focuses on the amount of working hours that the workers ,under the age of 16 ,have to work. “One 15-year-old worker from Wenshan, Yunnan, was quoted as saying he works at least 28 days a month, starting work each day at 7.30am and never finishing before 10pm.” This is the type of statement that the author Mandy Zou uses to persuade her readers into seeing her point of view.

]]> 2018-03-29 16:19:30 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315087 Alana Paragraph 2 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315265 This article presents the topic with an opening title, “China swaps sweatshops for smart tech in bid to reclaim lost ground.” By using this title they appeal to the business side of things,because all throughout the article they show the benefits of not using sweatshops versus easy to use tech. In the article the author also appeals to their audience’s empathy by using a quote from one of the workers. “We’ve had enough of those days when we earned so little by making goods for big brands”. There is an ideological bias presented in this article being that the article mainly focuses on opinions and includes factual evidence about the benefit of having a safer more efficient system. 

]]> 2018-03-29 16:19:55 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315265 Alana Paragraph 1 abrown197 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315406 This article presents the topic of sweatshops in china with statistics on what the workers have to go through. Appealing to the emotions of their readers going into depth on the mistreatment of the workers. With workers ranging from the ages of 13 and older the article displays the woes that they have to endure. Whether it be pictures or statements from the workers. However there is an ideological bias that the author displays in the article by appealing to the emotions as well as the intelligence of the audience. “There are approximately 150 million internal migrant workers in China who, because of their status, do not receive any state benefits or protection.” This quote along with many others displays this ideological bias.

]]> 2018-03-29 16:20:16 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315406 Melina Paragraph 4 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315778 This article is presented to the reader as if someone was giving a tour of the sweatshop. With information about how things worked and where they were in between. The article also makes sure to give backstory as to how the shop came to be. For example “Since 2003, China has invested at least 70 percent of its foreign direct investment into African nations. Back home, China has been universally applauded for reversing the story of hardship in its own nation as a result of its historic economic growth, which has lifted 500 million people out of poverty. And abroad, China is also responsible for helping to change the narrative throughout Africa with the roads, hospitals, schools, and manufacturing jobs that Chinese investment has created.” This helps the reader understand how things came to be and also helps them to feel reassured that they aren’t reading fake news. I don’t detect any bias in the article and the information given was supported with pictures and statistics. Assuming that the pictures are from where they say they are too.]]> 2018-03-29 16:21:08 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315778 Melina Paragraph 3 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315919 This article has no bias in it all information is from a worker, statistics, real observations by the reporter. The article was written in a manor almost of someone giving feedback on a report they had read but, in a good way. After each piece of information there is something or someone backing the statement. An example would be “ a series of reports from the Asia Floor Wage Alliance suggests that little has been done to improve conditions for garment workers in developing Asian nations.” “ it says that most Cambodians in Walmart supplier factories work under "highly exploitative" contracts that "leave them susceptible to unsafe working conditions, low wages, denial of benefits and harsh penalties for engaging in union activity -- including termination of employment."” The reporter stated that there were reports taken and then gave results of said reports which helps reassure the reader that what they are reading may reliable.]]> 2018-03-29 16:21:25 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247315919 Melina Paragraph 2 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247316065 “Mattel's real toy story: slave labor in sweatshops” is about how toy companies are overworking workers. The article tells about the horribly living situations, the unpaid and illegal overtime, the horrible pay, and hazardous surroundings that the workers must work in. “Here in the Pearl River Delta, China, the pollution levels are on average two or three times those permitted in the West. with its swirling red dust, toxic rivers and thick, choking smog that hovers everywhere, stinging eyes and throats.” Most of the information in the article comes from real people who work in this factory. They also come from interviews of people who work non-stop in the factory. There does not happen to be any biased opinions in this article all information given is either from a real person or is a statistic. ]]> 2018-03-29 16:21:49 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247316065 Melina Paragraph 1 mwinfrey19 https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247316201 In the article “Apple 'failing to protect Chinese factory workers'” my topic is presented through real experiences by an undercover BBC Panorama investigation reporter who went into a Pegatron factory to get the real inside story. The article is also targeting Apple specifically stating that “Apple's promises to protect workers were routinely broken.” Throughout the article the company repeatedly states that “They are aware of no other company doing as much as Apple to ensure fair and safe working conditions.” But the entire article is proving their statements incorrect. By what could be real footage of workers in Shanghai, passing-out/sleeping on the job from 12 to 18 hour shifts. The information also comes from standards on workers' hours, ID cards, dormitories, work meetings and juvenile workers according to the article. I also do not detect any bias in this article which makes it seem more trusting and factual. ]]> 2018-03-29 16:22:08 UTC https://padlet.com/kmurry19/fjv9wf5s3uu5/wish/247316201