<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>  ( plan + problématique)  by felixledantec</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm</link>
      <description>Fait avec émerveillement</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2017-03-24 09:53:43 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2017-03-31 12:30:52 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Problématique:    What are autobiographies  used for  ?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162358944</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><strong>Plan</strong>:<br><strong>I) novel autobiographie William Wells Brawn<br></strong>Autobiographies are useful for the memory. They allow of na not to forget and pass on events spent. But. What is that this autobiographies is totally true?&nbsp; Can we be sure that they are reliable ?&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Events we be can be exaggerated because there is that one point of view.&nbsp; <br><strong>II) What are the various types of autobiographies ?&nbsp; <br></strong>There are many different autobiographies like a sculpter (Dali)or a painted.<br>The artists make autobiographies so that we remember them. They want to leave a track of them when they will be left. It is also to show in the others how he sees itself. For example Dali sees itself deformed.<br><strong>III)Personnal document<br>"Love letters to the dead" is a novel<br><br></strong><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-24 10:26:33 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162358944</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title> Are autobiographies a trustworthy source of information about the author and his time ? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162363722</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br><strong>I) Real but not accurate : In some cases</strong><br>- William Wells Brown and his "new start" as a person and a new era in his story<br>-Biased: But are other autobiographies true ? or did the author create an alternative life/events to fill his real life ? is WWB (or any other author of an autobiography) trustworthy ? are there any sources or anything ? <br><br><strong>II) Autobiographies in art: Selfportraits and the notion of abstract </strong><br>-Lucian Freud and his autoportraits which represent the passing of time and show how ageing really is <br>-Dali with is surnaturnal autopainting surrounded by symbolism <br><br><strong>III) Personal Document:</strong> J.D Salinger - The Catcher In The Rye.<br>- A real and fictional autobiography&nbsp;</div><div>extract: Chapter 1:<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-24 10:50:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162363722</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Titouan Berthaux</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162364775</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Are autobiographies always an appropriate tool to get an accurate idea about a fact or a topic ?<br>I. Biased and unbiased -&gt; William Wells Brown, Stephen Fry<br>II. self represtentation in other arts: what does it give ? -&gt; Van Gogh self portait,  Maurice Ravel The Child and The Spells<br>III. Personal Document: My Early Life, Winston Churchill</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-24 10:56:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162364775</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Are autobiographies a reliable tool for historians to know the past, or for readers to know the author ?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162366130</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><em>I/ It relates real facts from history, or for the personnal lives of the authors</em><br>- Autobiographies can give us details about history William Wells Brown and slavery + Anne Frank<br>And about the past of authors: they tried to describe the reality (method: Dali).<br>- We can understand some choices of the authors: A significant Event<br><br><em>II/ The problems of objectivity: authors aren't unbiased.</em><br>- Slavery: victims, so they can be chocked, traumatized : W.W. Brown<br>+ Personnal document about historians who don't count on slave's testimony<br>- Authors can't be unbiased, because they have a goal when they write : Winston Churchill<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-24 11:05:22 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/162366130</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>What are features of autobiographies? Is this topic raise issues?</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163914136</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><br>I/ It can deliver a real message and the possiblity to relive our past<br><br>II/ But it raise some&nbsp; issues most of the time : there is a lack of objectivity.&nbsp;<br><br>III/ however, autobiography can be useful in art.<br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-31 09:29:03 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163914136</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Is autobiography a trustworthy  source of information ? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163915829</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Intro :<br>what is an autobiography ? <br>-&gt; autobiography : usually, it's when an author decide towrite about his life. <br>But it can be in others kind of art : autoportrait Dali. <br><br>I/Is memory reliable or not ?<br>-how do an author deal with the fac that he has to remeber everything every detail of their lives. <br><em>ex : Maria Angelu. </em><br>-Usually, the author write about a special event for him, not every things in his childhood -&gt; maybe not that reliable. <br><em>ex : a significant event.</em><br>-Can the author change the past ? -&gt; bond of trust with the reader.&nbsp; <br><br>II/Biased or unbiased<br>-The author can't be objective in an autobiographie : it's his own story so he has a personnal eyes on the facts.<br><em>ex : WWB gives only his point of view, he's shocked by what had lived.<br><br></em>I/ A considerable importance for the reader<br>-Give another point of view on fact that we sometimes already know. <br><em>ex :Anne Franck.</em><br><br><br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-31 09:38:11 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163915829</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Can autobiographies say the thruth of the personal events of the life of the author and of the historical facts ? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163920271</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I- An autobiography must tell a personal and real testimony of the life of the author<br><br>II- But autobiography can be a source of inaccurate informations<br><br>III- The goal of autobiography is also to denounce or reveals the truth about significant historical events;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-31 10:04:02 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163920271</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Alice Thomas</title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163922658</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>To what extent can autobiographies be trusted?</div><div><br><br></div><div>I) Importance of autobiographies</div><div> → be remembered</div><div> → to not forget important events (slavery, wars…)</div><div><br><br></div><div>II) Not always trustworthy</div><div> → author can say whatever they want / change some parts / choose only the parts where they did good things</div><div> → can be biased / have only 1 POV</div><div><br><br></div><div>III) The reader’s role</div><div> → not believing every word, take a step back </div><div> → confront different stories/POV</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-31 10:16:42 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163922658</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Can autobiographies be unbiased ? </title>
         <author></author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163924612</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>&nbsp;I°) Why is it often biased ?</div><div><br>a) is the memory of autobiographers a trustworthy source of information ; <br><br></div><div>&nbsp;a) What are the goals of an autobiography</div><div><br><br></div><div>&nbsp;b) The reality can be changed</div><div><br></div><div>&nbsp;II°) The link with the reader</div><div><br><br></div><div>&nbsp;a) The role of the reader</div><div><br><br></div><div>&nbsp;b)&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2017-03-31 10:26:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/litenglish222/fjpquwc99emm/wish/163924612</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
