The film evidently proved the ideal that Travolta was a triple threat at the beginning of his career.

Gene Siskel, the notoriously famous film critic between the 60's-90's, himself revealed that 'SNF' was his favourite film and that he had watched it 17 times.

Thus proving that Travolta excelled in his role as 'Tony' and the film accelerated his 'popular star' image in the media.

This suggests that Travolta’s ‘hunk of the month’ glory days are coming to a close as even films such as ‘Perfect’, that show him half-naked and arguably desirable, no longer impress his fan base or the box-office.

Peter Travers, ‘The Rolling Stone’ received his performance as “dynamite”. He further stated that “John Travolta and Bruce Willis can consider their careers revived.”

This review having been published on 'The Rolling Stone' website further enhances Travolta's comeback as this online magazine has a varied demographic of all ages and therefore a high credibility in reviewing numerous types of media.

To speak of Travolta's performance so avidly, readers would be inclined to either watch Tarantino's masterpiece and/or begin to re-evaluate Travolta as a respectable actor once again.

Whereby this ensures that Travolta is the “object of the erotic spectacle” and therefore feeds into the heavy sexualisation created of Travolta at the beginning of his career. 

Although, not only can Travolta be described as being sexualised in Saturday Night Fever but also feminised as his character’s costumes consist of heeled boots, skin-tight trousers, and open-chest silk shirts. 

• 21st Century Leaders
• Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes
• Children with AIDS
• Citymeals On Wheels
• End Hunger Network
• Harry Holmberg Memorial Foundation
• Jett Travolta Foundation
• Last Chance for Animals
• Luke Neuhedel Foundation
• Make A Child Smile Appeal
• Mississippi Animal Rescue League
• Red Cross
• St. Francis Food Pantries and Shelters
• St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
• St. Vincent's HealthCare
• Whatever It Takes

The importance of the charity event being hosted by Jamie Lee Curtis shows Travolta’s personality of staying true to his roots by continuing to support old age friends even from the start of his career. 

The environment of the advert shows the three celebrities dancing around an idealised family neighbourhood reinforcing the 'family-man' attribute Travolta currently embodies.

Travolta states that although he's been through so much loss, the church was able to get him through it, and for that, he will forever be grateful.

Thus proving a loyal characteristic of his personality toward his faith which is an appealing trait for his star image.

"After "Perfect," Travolta struggled to find success with his next film, "The Experts," which was completely ignored by audiences and criticized by reviewers. This marked the beginning of a period where Hollywood stopped taking Travolta seriously."

The film 'Perfect' was far from a comercial success as the film grossed less than £13 million despite its production cost of £20 million. For Travolta, starring in such a highly critiqued film, this only damages his career and potential role casts for the future, which this did.

However, as this is a staged advert, it could create question into the authenticity of this carefree persona by his fans/audience.

To play a woman he shows to the media that he is confident enough within his sexuality and himself that he can play the role of the opposite sex with ease.

Not only does it show a confidence in Travolta but also that he wouldn't care how the media would perceive this role. This allows Travolta to showcase that this comedic role is perfect for him. Therefore, impressing his fan base as he proves to the audience the range in which he can perform.

Such negative reception of his image could enforce a lack of future comedic roles for the star to which is suggestive his acting abilities are not as impressive as one would assume.

Ebert suggests in his review that Travolta has upheld his talent and makes the film to what the original intended.

Yet another singing and dancing role for Travolta further emphasizes that he is still the same triple-threat in Hollywood as he was in the 70's.

This places Travolta's image back on the pedestal it once was on in the 70's. Once again Travolta will be recognised by the media as a respectable actor.

He described the feeling as “surreal” presenting to the audience another ‘grateful’ account of being recognised as an actor. 

This displays Travolta's star image as grateful once again for his recognition in Hollywood.

The power he holds in the church is described by Augustine as Travolta being able to be "blissfully unaware of the numerous cases of abuse that have reportedly occurred."

Comedic jabs were taken at the expense of Travolta's mishap in other celebrities' speeches, which could be argued by the media letting Travolta off the hook for his embarrassing mistake.

However, reporter Antonia Georgiou calls Travolta out as Hollywood's creepy uncle from the way in which he holds Idina's face, slowly caressing and holding her.

Whereby, this situates Travolta as yet another white, rich, man who exerts power over those who he would believe to put up with such behavior.

• Antonia Georgiou (2022) - NickySwift.com

As they believe one is only unwell when surrounded by a negative energy who doesn't agree with Scientology. Therefore working with so many charities could enforce a contrast of opinion and in turn confusing for Travolta's fanbase because his authenticity is conflicted.

However, Travolta to date (2023) has now had 4 separate assault cases lined up against him, which have been circulating the media for the last two decades.

This inevitably has been increasingly damaging to Travolta's star image as large media outlets such as 'Vanity Fair', 'BBC', 'The Guardian' etc.. have all reported on the accusations.

Whereby, all of which outline the seriousness of Travolta's trials and accusations, potentially aiding the 'guilty' viewpoint.

This quote reinforces what Travolta evidenced at the Oscars both years with Menzel; reducing her success to clear unimportance by completely mispronouncing her name. To then follow such a travesty by seducingly caressing her face and lips in front of millions, which a potential negative reaction from Menzel would situate her new image in the media as 'over the top and dramatic'.

As Juliette Lewis calls out Tom Cruise and John Travolta for being too concerned with their "squeaky-clean" and "family man" image.

Not only does Lewis state her opinion about the stars but also offers an alternative viewpoint for Scientology as a whole which positions the faith in a positive light.

This could work in Travolta's favour because if Lewis is seen as presenting her authentic self in this article then the readers could be more inclined to believe her stance on what the church really is.

Overall, suggesting that Travolta isn't part of a dangerous faith and his star image taking less of a hit.

The #MeToo question was asked to Travolta at Cannes Film Festival surrounding the recent accusations against Harvey Weinstein (whom Travolta worked with on set of Pulp Fiction).

To which Travolta gave a 'roundabout' answer and followed by questioning the usefulness of protests generally.

This questions Travolta's involvement in feminism in particular as well as the advocation for abolishing sexual abuse. Whereby this would aid the media more leverage into believing the accusations made against Travolta as he seems opposed to standing with the #MeToo Movement.

"Throughout the 1970s, his style-savvy roles had a lot of say in his off-screen wardrobe, which comprised of cool leather boots, Western shirts and impeccable tailoring."

This article on Travolta provides solid credibility to his star image as GQ highlights the most influential celebrities and their style.

GQ continues to describe Travolta's style as "an influx of inspiration."

GQ continues to boost Travolta's image in regards to keeping his style relevant throughout the years as GQ hold such a respectable position in what is fashionable or not in the media.

Although, the pictures of Travolta in this issue are all strictly professional as he is displayed in a suit and tie.

GQ is no longer playing along with the 70's 'heartthrob persona' and instead displaying Travolta professionally to ensure the media receive the "squeaky-clean" image he now solely displays.

Not only does the article display Travolta as a style icon in the 70's but also brave to do so as his costumes in films as well as his own style choices in the 70's challenged what Stella Bruzzi would've defined as manly.