https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x Made with fortitude en-us 2021-02-04 06:24:23 UTC 2021-02-11 06:36:59 UTC hello@padlet.com ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162156676 taking measures to see if there is no owner 

does belong to another but does not know who

intention to deprive but there is no dishonesty as owner cant be found 

holes- so maybe someone abandoned it. so can be stolen ]]> 2021-02-04 06:26:07 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162156676 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162157938 AR
s 3(1) -appropriations -
s 4(1) - property 
s 5(1) - belonging to another 
MR 
s 2(1) b - appropritation based on the belief that they would have the consent of the other party 
s 6 (not present) - no intention to permanenlty deprive as she returned the book. ]]> 2021-02-04 06:26:38 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162157938 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162175462 no guilty]]> 2021-02-04 06:33:40 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162175462 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162176349 belongs to another 

no intention to permanently deprive but if a property is retuned when value is gone then it is regarded at theft (case?)]]> 2021-02-04 06:34:01 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162176349 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162186624 if he appropriates the property in the belief that he would have the other’s consent if the other knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it; or]]> 2021-02-04 06:37:52 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1162186624 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190645881 even after she finds out its maries bike...she tries to remove the initials and take it - theft ]]> 2021-02-11 05:28:09 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190645881 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190656947 when she took the bike...she didnt know it was stolen.

1) its property
2) appropriation belonging to another

-she had intention to be premanentaly deprive
-dishonesty s.2.1 (gosh iv test)


s3.2- appropriation
Where property or a right or interest in property is or purports to be transferred for value to a person acting in good faith, no later assumption by him of rights which he believed himself to be acquiring shall, by reason of any defect in the transferor’s title, amount to theft of the property.

ownership did not pass to her 

can she be charged with theft?
if you come by property innocently...then you cant be charged with theft.

if you bought the property then you cant be charged - she can claw the property back by paying compensation under civil law ]]> 2021-02-11 05:34:32 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190656947 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190700668 can be charged with theft as she had the intent (intending to leave the store without paying for them ). however, there is no evidence. 


]]> 2021-02-11 06:00:42 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190700668 ibrahimsaeed52 https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190709510 ownership has passed to sandra.

case: cashier gave the shoes for the wrong price (kaur) not void for mistake and property was passed

so the extra money belongs to her

no MR-no dishonesty-no intention to permanently deprive
no AR obviously

s5.4-Where a person gets property by another’s mistake, and is under an obligation to make restoration (in whole or in part) of the property or its proceeds or of the value thereof, then to the extent of that obligation the property or proceeds shall be regarded (as against him) as belonging to the person entitled to restoration, and an intention not to make restoration shall be regarded accordingly as an intention to deprive that person of the property or proceeds.

so this is  regarded as theft as deemed belonging to another if you dont restore

she intents not giving it back...also dishonesty

s2.1 - person to whom the property belongs cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps.]]> 2021-02-11 06:05:40 UTC https://padlet.com/ibrahimsaeed52/f6gcvwsv4g5vxw5x/wish/1190709510