<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Assignment 1: The Shroud of Turin by </title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df</link>
      <description>Nicholas Acre (working individually)</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-03-05 18:14:31 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-06-21 10:36:22 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>RED FLAG: Confirmation Bias</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238262872</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:</strong> The tendency to remember events and evidence that coincide with your views, and forgetting or ignoring those that do not.<br><strong>Connection:</strong> Those that believe in the authenticity of the Shroud of Turin refer to carbon dating to support their belief, but those scientists who specialize in carbon dating state how being in a fire in the early 1500s would not explain why carbon dating would put the shroud at 650 years old. For the believers, carbon dating is a verified means of proving the truth so long as it confirms <em>their</em> truth.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.ericgarland.co/wp-content/uploads/pix/2016/09/confirmation-bias.png" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-05 18:25:24 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238262872</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RED FLAG: Suppressed By Authorities</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238275383</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:</strong> The argument that information and truth pertaining to the belief exists, but is only inaccessible because those in power has an interest in suppressing it.<br><strong>Connection:</strong> The Shroud of Turin was supposedly recovered by crusaders during one of their forays into the east, specifically the sack of Constantinople in 1204. Why wasn't there more mention of Jesus Christ's burial shroud in the Christian Byzantine sources? Why did the crusaders (by definition, warriors with a vested interest in religion) let such a sacred relic spend two to three hundred years in obscurity before letting it reappear in the public eye in Italy?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://crusaderhistory.wordpress.com/2016/07/11/the-turin-shroud/" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-05 18:41:45 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238275383</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RED FLAG: Ideological Support</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238299558</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:</strong> Causes that use courts, marches, campaigns, and so on to push a belief may be fueled more by ideology than by science. <br><strong>Connection:</strong> The authenticity of the Shroud of Turin is argued most tenaciously by Christians, especially Catholics - their faith describes Jesus as a creator of miracles, and therefore all science surrounding the shroud's authenticity is either buttressing or overshadowed by Christ's divine power.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.kaldaya.net/2010/Images/Religious/Cross_2010.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-05 19:14:48 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238299558</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RED FLAG: Red Herrings</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238408201</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div><strong>Definition:</strong> Irrelevant information to distract from actual facts.<br><strong>Connection:</strong> A great deal of scholarly debate and scientific inquiry has surrounded the material and geographic origin of the shroud, but this is ultimately irrelevant to the central question of the Shroud of Turin: Is that actually a silhouette of Jesus Christ in it?</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.skepdic.com/shroud.html" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-06 00:41:30 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238408201</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>REASON FOR BELIEF: Blood Stains</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238430115</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The Shroud of Turin has had a number of blood spatters discovered on it, with chemical composition consistent with one enduring torture - an alarmingly painful length to go to for manufacturing a fraud.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISUd_HGN1Iw" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-06 02:29:50 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238430115</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>REASON FOR BELIEF: Inability To Replicate</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238434357</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Modern technology has consistently failed to make a perfect replica of the Shroud of Turin, although impressive imitations have been made. </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1218457/Shroud-Turin-replica-proves-medieval-techniques-make-relic-say-scientists.html" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-06 02:52:55 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238434357</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>REASON FOR BELIEF: Pollen Grains</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238438072</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Pollen grains have been found on the Shroud of Turin that Avinoam Danin, a botanist from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem claims can only correspond to plants from the Dead Sea area. For the shroud to be a forgery, the creators would have to be extremely dedicated indeed.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="http://www.skepdic.com/shroud.html" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-06 03:12:40 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238438072</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Critical Analysis</title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238440034</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/269617459/63259c921c1309cf78386a07cf12a9de/turin_analysis.docx" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-06 03:23:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238440034</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title></title>
         <author>nicholasacre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238440729</link>
         <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
         <enclosure url="https://padlet-uploads.storage.googleapis.com/269617459/8fee4b5f49422cda4c5992b6189f20e8/shraud.jpg" />
         <pubDate>2018-03-06 03:28:13 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/nicholasacre/f3oisd36o0df/wish/238440729</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
