Literature review - see if they can access current upto date research and be able to plan their own hypothesis. Also shows synthesis skills, transition for honours students - acknowledging the gaps in the field. Followed by;

Oral presentation - quizzed on hypothesis literature to show level of understanding

Summary of previous research e.g. Masters research - and follow up with an interview to see if the student has an understanding of their own work and demonstrate communication skills.

Language barrier or specific skill set - set a specific task to evaluate the skill.

The candidate should supply two referees

Supervisor could check out the referees through google scholar, etc to ensure the referees are credible

The supervisor could make a phone call to see if the referee is willing to participate and ask for some written feedback.

Email or teams is also possible.

Subheadings such as how is the student with timelines, are they reliable etc

Proforma to be used if CSU has one

Another suggested approach to was to do a 360 degrees evaluation to see if the candidate's values are aligned to CSU. Make it a safe environment

Sometimes use an excel spreadsheet and rate the candidates - experience in previous research, communication skills. Do this blind and have a discussion. Short-list to 2-3 candidates. Make a decision. [Industry funded PhD candidates will be paid - volume of candidates]. Ensure we have a robust ethical process. Enables clear and precise feedback.