<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>International Organizations by hande öztürk</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2023-01-24 09:20:21 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2023-01-24 10:17:34 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Week-1</title>
         <author>handeozturk1245</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454397472</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Theories are used by scholars to define, explain, and forecast many aspects of international relations. Each is founded on a collection of core concepts about the nature and functions of humans, views about the state, sovereignty, and relations between states and other actors, as well as ideas about the international system.&nbsp;<br>Rationalist theories identify relationships between antecedents, known as independent factors, and outcomes, known as dependent variables. Propositions are postulated from theory and tested in the real world through observations. According to functionalist theory, international organizations tend to evolve from a more limited and technical emphasis to larger and more political endeavors. This idea may be evaluated against the evolution of European regionalism or the history of UN specialized agencies by meticulous process tracing, comprehensive case studies of specific institutions, or possibly a statistical test that spans several cases.&nbsp;<br>On the other hand, constructivism and most critical theories are not testable in the same manner. Rather, they are judged on whether the assertions are internally coherent or contribute to clarifying the genuine nature of international organizations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-24 09:35:35 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454397472</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week-2</title>
         <author>handeozturk1245</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454413230</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>International organizations provide a variety of important functions for liberals.<br>They are a major tool of reducing the risk of conflict, fostering the establishment of common standards, and restoring order. They carry out operational actions to aid in the resolution of substantive international issues and may be members of international regimes.<br>Functionalism is based on the concept that governance structures emerge from people's and states' basic, or functional, requirements. As a result, it explains the origins and growth of many IGOs. However, functionalists argue that worldwide economic and social cooperation is a requirement for political collaboration and the abolition of war, the root causes of which are illiteracy, poverty, hunger, and sickness.&nbsp;<br>According to public goods theory, people presented with a collective action dilemma may attempt to reorganize actors' preferences through rewards and penalties. Mechanisms might be devised, for example, to provide positive incentives for nations to desist from harming the polar areas and to charge or threaten to punish those that do not cooperate.<br>The collective goods theory may explain the function of international agreements, IGOs, and international regimes in creating (or underproducing) various products. It may also be used to look at gaps in international efforts to address policy concerns. Collective goods theory is particularly beneficial for investigating global commons areas such as the high seas or the ozone layer, over which no state may claim sovereignty since they have been recognized as humanity's common inheritance.&nbsp;<br>Lastly, in the premise that state actions are based on rational calculations regarding subjective anticipated benefit is central to the rational or strategic choice theory. These calculations take into account assessments of others' skills and intentions.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-24 09:49:20 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454413230</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week-3</title>
         <author>handeozturk1245</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454424698</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Marxism, like realism and liberalism, has a core set of concepts that link its varieties. These include a historical foundation, the primacy of economic factors in understanding political and social events, the fundamental role of the production process, capitalism's unique nature as a global mode of production, and the relevance of social or economic class in defining players. The development of the production process may also be used to describe the link between production, social relationships, and power. According to Karl Marx, a battle between the capitalist class and the working class was unavoidable. On the other hand, International law and organizations, according to Marxists and neo-Marxists, are the results of powerful governments, dominant ideologies, and the interests of the capitalist class. Some see them as tools of economic dominance imposed on others. The Classical Marxist viewpoint sees international organizations as a tool of persuading others to accept dominance through common ideals.&nbsp;<br>In addition to those, among the critical theory strands are feminists who contend that understanding gender entails more than simply counting women in top positions or collecting initiatives aimed at women. Gender pervades all international systems. The emphasis on governments and international organizations involved in diplomacy and conflict in international relations diminishes the significance of homes, families, and communities. When international relations are studied entirely in the public arena, a wide spectrum of private human activity is simply neglected, despite the fact that it lies at the core of development, human rights, human security, and identity.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-24 09:59:29 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454424698</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week-6</title>
         <author>handeozturk1245</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454432248</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>The creation of the United Nations in the last days of World War II was an expression of war-weary nations' desire for a comprehensive international organization that might help them avoid future conflicts and foster worldwide economic and social cooperation. The organization of the UN was based after that of the League of Nations in many areas, with revisions made where lessons had been learnt. The League's Council, for example, could only act with the unanimous agreement; the UN Security Council, although requiring the backing of all five permanent members, simply requires a majority of nonpermanent members to act.<br>Delegates from the fifty participating states adjusted and confirmed what had already been discussed among the great powers before the United Nations Conference on International Organization began in San Francisco on April 25, 1945. The United States became the first country to ratify the UN Charter on July 28, 1945, with Senate support.<br>After all, the UN system includes nineteen specialized organizations, including the first two public international unions, the ITU and UPU. The number and variety of such specialized and functional organizations has grown dramatically over the last century, and many are not affiliated with the UN system.<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-24 10:06:38 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454432248</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Week-7</title>
         <author>handeozturk1245</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454443894</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>War has traditionally been the central issue in international politics; it has also been a driving force behind the formation of IGOs, from the Concert of Europe in the nineteenth century through the League of Nations and the United Nations in the twentieth. The underlying functionalist theory is the idea that bringing governments together to solve real international relations problems would create the conditions for long-term peace. International law was generally viewed as providing the norms that would assist create order in the interactions between nations, and international courts or arbitration procedures would provide a peaceful manner of resolving legal disputes.&nbsp;<br>As a result, while being the most destructive century in human history, the twentieth century also saw the development of numerous governance systems for averting conflict.<br>However, the nature of wars and conflicts has changed significantly over the last seven decades, as have ideas of security. Since 1945, there has been a substantial drop in the occurrence of interstate conflict (hostilities between two or more states), with no wars involving major powers or sophisticated industrial countries. Since 1980, the most significant has been the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the Ethiopia-Eritrea War (1999-2000), and the Russo-Georgian War (2008).&nbsp;<br>Researchers have been debating whether the decreased trend in active disputes signals fewer new conflicts or more efficacy in settling old ones. There was a boom in terminations in the 1990s and early 2000s, leading academics to infer that dispute resolution initiatives had grown more effective.&nbsp;<br>Many post-Cold War intrastate wars have been accompanied by humanitarian disasters caused by combat, ethnic cleansing or genocide, the breakdown of political authority, starvation, and illness. Traditionally, security under the Westphalian system meant border security, population management, and independence from interference in the government's jurisdiction over its internal affairs. After WWII, as the corpus of internationally recognized human rights principles grew, the balance between the rights of sovereign nations and the rights of individuals began to change. Human security, it was increasingly asserted, should take precedence above the security of governments or nations.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2023-01-24 10:17:34 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/handeozturk1245/ev74wvoxuc8krruv/wish/2454443894</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
