Mapp v. Ohio by Emma Perez https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa en-us 2025-03-04 13:33:45 UTC 2025-03-06 16:13:39 UTC hello@padlet.com People involved in the case perez12_1 https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350760995 Plaintiff - Dollree Mapp

Defendant - Ohio - including the police involved.

Judges: Warren, Black, Frankfurter, Douglas, Douglas, Clark, Harlan, Brennan, Whittaker, and Stwert.


]]> 2025-03-04 13:46:49 UTC https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350760995 Key facts about the case perez12_1 https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350777006 Dollree Mapp was convicted of possessing obscene materials after an admittedly illegal police search of her home for a fugitive. She appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression.

]]> 2025-03-04 13:58:21 UTC https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350777006 Questions the court addressed perez12_1 https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350783348 Q: Were the confiscated materials protected from seizure by the Fourth Amendment?

]]> 2025-03-04 14:02:46 UTC https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350783348 Conclusion perez12_1 https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350787020 Decision: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of Mapp, 5-3. The high court said evidence seized unlawfully, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

]]> 2025-03-04 14:05:11 UTC https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3350787020 Video perez12_1 https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3351060267 2025-03-04 17:02:05 UTC https://padlet.com/perez12_1/es590v3d2kcevrwa/wish/3351060267