<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>wolf unit journal by Rebecca Martin</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk</link>
      <description>Made with a warm hug</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2018-02-14 17:32:59 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2018-02-23 16:28:29 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>Journal Entry #2</title>
         <author>martinre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk/wish/231618554</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Organisms affect each other in many different ways. One way being if one species go down the species that organism eats will probably go up. For example the Nassau grouper eats snapper fish, if the amount  Nassau Grouper goes down the amount the snappers will go up because no groupers will be eating them. When the grouper started to get over fished the amount of grouper went from 102 to 23 after just 10 years and 70% of fishing grouper only. The amount of snapper did they exact opposite of the group and ascended from 103 to 181 in that same amount of time under the same conditions. My information came from the coral reef lab. i do believe that once the amount of grouper went down the carrying capacity went up some. Competition is happening between most animals because animals are constantly fighting to get resources like, water, berries, nuts, meat, and other foods etc.  </div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-14 17:41:26 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk/wish/231618554</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Entry #1</title>
         <author>martinre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk/wish/233872075</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>I do not believe that wolves should be part of the endangered species act. One of my three reasons why is that when wolves have pups they have many in a single birth. Second reason is they are not endangered they have many in wildlife today. Third and final reason is they have enough food to support all or most of the wolves in wildlife. So they do not need to be part of the endangered species act.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-21 17:31:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk/wish/233872075</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Journal Entry #3</title>
         <author>martinre</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk/wish/233894334</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Over the past 40 years the amount of Yellowstone animals have went up and down, changing around at every curve. In 1997 or somewhere around that time the moose hit its highest point since 2009, which was 2500. The wolfs highest point was in 1979 and it was also 2500. The moose also has a lowest point which was in 1990 and only about 600 moose were in Yellowstone. This going lower most likely affected the wolfs as well because they eat the moose and if there was fewer moose there would be fewer wolves.</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2018-02-21 18:07:46 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/martinre/ervc9m4k9ctk/wish/233894334</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
