1.      Judge and lawyers 

Computers won’t be placed in charge of towns, cities, states, or countries. Computers won’t be creating new laws. Computers won’t be making judicial decisions. Governors, lawmakers, judges, and juries will always need some sense of human discernment that computers will never be able to offer. 

 

2.      Teachers and lecturer 

And what about teaching subjects that aren’t as objective as science and math, that aren’t simply based on knowledge? Would a computer be able to understand the nuances of music, art and literature, let alone teach it in a subjective manner? The possibility of that is doubtful, and even if it were to come to pass, it wouldn’t be for a long time. 

 

3.      Doctors and surgeons 

On the one hand, the aspects of medicine that are entirely based on medical knowledge, technical expertise, and data analysis could be reasonably automated without much consequence. However, there are elements of healthcare that computers just aren’t capable of handling: bedside manner, making tough decisions from incomplete patient data, dealing with human psychology, and so on 

 

4.      Compute system analysis 

 It may seem ironic to suggest that computer-related jobs are among those least threatened by computers. In reality the more our economy relies on automation, the more we’ll need people who can implement and manage those systems. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that there will be a 21% increase in the number of analysts by 2024, a rate much higher than for most occupations. The future for computer analysts looks bright indeed. 
 
 

5.      Police and Firemen 

Police and Firemen cannot be replaced by stringent computer programming. It requires intuition and problem solving to execute the task.