<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Geography population case studies by Luke Dobbe</title>
      <link>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>2016-05-28 10:14:42 UTC</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>2016-06-08 08:00:11 UTC</lastBuildDate>
      <webMaster>hello@padlet.com</webMaster>
      
      <item>
         <title>China&#39;s one child policy </title>
         <author>ldobbe1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/112914866</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- China has the largest population of any county over 1.3 billion&nbsp;<br>- the one child policy was introduced in 1979 to stop rapid population growth, the population was growing at 1.9% each year and would soon become unstable&nbsp;<br>- also the famine in 1959 means there was a lack of food to feed the increasing population.<br>-couples that only have one child are given benefits eg. Longer maternity leave, better housing and free education for the child.<br><br>To enforce the policy they:<br>- made people unable to marry until late 20s<br>- had granny police watching couples of child bearing age&nbsp;<br>- accompanied women to contraception appointments&nbsp;<br>- enforced Pay cuts for fellow workers if you broke the policy&nbsp;<br><br>There were exceptions to the policy:<br>- in some rural areas parents were allowed a second child if the first was a girl or disabled as they needed children to work on the farms (after 1990)&nbsp;<br>- if one parent had a disability or both are only children, then couple allowed to have second child so there is enough people to look after the patents<br>- if you are from a minority group , to stop them going extinct.&nbsp;<br>- if both parents only child they were allowed 2 children (after 1990)<br><br>Effectiveness:<br>- the policy prevented up to 400 million births&nbsp;<br>- the average number of children a women will have has dropped from 5.7 (1980) to 1.8<br>- standard of living increased as bonus given to people who followed the policy.<br>-&nbsp; some people believe that it was not the just the one child policy that slowed population growth , they think older policy's like leavening longer grabs between children's births were more effective. And that the Chinese people wanted fewer kids as they are now more wealthy<br><br>Issues:&nbsp;<br>- infanticides&nbsp;<br>- one child has to support 2 parents and 4 grandparents&nbsp;<br><br></div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-05-28 10:17:31 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/112914866</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>U.K. Aging population </title>
         <author>ldobbe1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/112915215</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- in 2005 16% of uk population was over 65&nbsp;<br><br>Causes:&nbsp;<br>- people are living longer because of medical advancements and improved standard of living.&nbsp;<br>- between 1980 and 2006 life expectancy rose 2.6 years for women and 6.4 years for men.<br>- lots of baby born in baby boom of 1940s and 1960s. Those born in 1940 are now retired creating a pensioner boom&nbsp;<br>- since 1970s the birth rate has reduced, fewer young people means the portion of older people in the population goes up.<br><br>Effects:<br>- more elderly people living in poverty as the working population is not large enough to pay for decent pensions&nbsp;<br>- state pension is low but the government is still struggling to pay it as taxes payed by working population is not enough to cover costs.<br>- the NHS is under pressure as older generation require more medical care the younger generation.<br><br>Government strategies:<br>- the retirement age was raised, thus means people pay taxes for longer and claim less state pensions<br>-the government encouraged young immigrants to move to the uk, this increased the number of people paying taxes</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-05-28 10:29:17 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/112915215</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Poland to uk migration</title>
         <author>ldobbe1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/112915946</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>Push factors:<br>- high unemployment (19%)<br>- low average wages <br>- housing shortages <br><br>Pull factors:<br>- ease of migration as in 2004 uk government allowed unlimated migration<br>- more work and higher wages <br>- good ecnabe rate as the pound worth a lot of polish currency <br><br>Effects on Poland:<br>-population fell by 0.3% and the birth rate fell as the only people left were the ageing population<br>- shortage of workers in Poland which slowed their economy <br>- polish economy was bosted by money sent home <br><br>Effects on uk:<br>- population increased slightly <br>- uk economy bosted but money was sent back to poland<br>- polish shops opened to serve polish communities <br>-many polish people are Catholic so Catholic Church attendance increased <br><br>U.K. Management of immigration:<br>-immigrant from Poland are not limited but they have to register the work they will be doing, this allows birder agencies to jointer how many people are coming in.<br>- large number of polish immigrants led to complaints by British people as they thought uk services could not cope under all the pressure <br>- in response government tightened control of migration of new EU states and they now need preemption from the head office to work in the uk</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-05-28 10:55:51 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/112915946</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>France pro natal policy for managing aging population</title>
         <author>ldobbe1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/113922511</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>France is using a stronge pro natal policy where it encourages people to have children it make a more favourable dependency ratio&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;The incentives are:&nbsp;<br>- three years paid maternity leave which can be used by the mother or the father<br>- full time schooling from the age of 3 paid by the government&nbsp;<br>- day care for children younger than 3 years old is subsidised by the government&nbsp;<br>- the more children a women has the early she will be allowed to retire on a state pension&nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-06-07 11:50:52 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/113922511</guid>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Keral population control </title>
         <author>ldobbe1</author>
         <link>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/113957945</link>
         <description><![CDATA[<div>- 32 million people&nbsp;<br>- Indians most heavily populated states<br>- lowest birth rate at 9.4% per year.&nbsp;<br><br>Approach:<br>- differant from India as it focuses on health care and education. 91% literacy rate compared to indias 61%.<br>- indias poorest state with an average income of $293 per year keraalns can live nearly as long as americans<br>- is successful because of two things ,&nbsp;<br>&nbsp; 1. Political decisions to invest in education and women's health . Almost all villages have access to schools and modern Heath clinics at least 2.5 km away.<br>&nbsp; &nbsp;2. Economics, they rely less on farming and more service industries such as tourism.<br><br>Comparison with India:<br>- from late 1970s it has lead India in public services - such as building roads and schools<br>- rural poverty is the lowest in southern India&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;- women's health and education is the best in India&nbsp;<br>- attitudes towards women are positive, more girl then boys in higher education&nbsp;<br>- very low infant mortality rate of 10 per 1000 live birth per population.&nbsp;<br>- over 95% of babies are born in a hospital<br><br>Sustainable development:<br><br>- Kerala has controlled the population growth by investing in healthcare and education while still allowing people the chose there won families and size of families.&nbsp;<br>- however, in 30 years it looks likes the population could stop growing which could create new problems &nbsp;</div>]]></description>
         <enclosure url="" />
         <pubDate>2016-06-07 15:12:49 UTC</pubDate>
         <guid>https://padlet.com/ldobbe1/Populationcasestudies/wish/113957945</guid>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
