https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7 Please list your name and answer these questions as you read through the article! https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xAonFJwz2FHtITMJ9S_8doUSa-77yWbsX5-7BlJzINA/edit?usp=sharing en-us 2021-05-04 03:34:24 UTC 2021-05-04 16:23:51 UTC hello@padlet.com mkeane11 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490248293 2021-05-04 15:42:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490248293 cmjohnson22 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490411937 2021-05-04 16:11:53 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490411937 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490424109 In the article it states," Keating, one of the three co-editors of the Encyclopedia of Chicago, doesn't see the attack 200 years ago as a massacre. And neither do many historians and Native American leaders. Yet, the effort to get rid of the term "Fort Dearborn Massacre" has prompted complaints from some quarters of "political correctness" and "historical revisionism," as if it's being done on a whim."  To add on the article says that it was a "collision of vision".

]]> 2021-05-04 16:14:03 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490424109 tmcneal16 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490427032 The article stated ¨The word "massacre" was used immediately after the battle as a rallying cry for the American war effort.¨ This shows that it wasn´t actually a massacre. ]]> 2021-05-04 16:14:35 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490427032 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490434555 From what I understand it was a battle for the natives to secure their land. The article described that this was called a massacre because it was another way to demonize the indians.]]> 2021-05-04 16:15:53 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490434555 mkkimbrough1 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490448624 In the article it says Calling the battle a "massacre" cast the engagement in stark black-and-white terms and demonized the Indians.]]> 2021-05-04 16:18:26 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490448624 https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490467902 "Calling the battle a "massacre" cast the engagement in stark black-and-white terms and demonized the Indians. Good guys and bad guys. Heroes and villains." Here the author uses the perfect example of creating two contrasting groups "Heroes and Villains". The natives were posed as villains. So because natives were fighting for their own land they were marked as the ones creating a massacre, rather than calling them protectors or the heroes.]]> 2021-05-04 16:21:44 UTC https://padlet.com/mkeane11/eos34isapn4ivhb7/wish/1490467902